I have a serious problem with gays pretending that gay unions are marriage. It is a offensive farce.
I have a problem with children being raised in a situation that deprives them of at least one parent AND one gender. I find it diabolically criminal to deliberately birth a child into that situation.
I have a problem equating obvious and critical distinctions in the attempt for those in denial to continue.
I am being guided about "realistic problems" from someone who uses their septic system as a playground? Excuse me if I don't agree.
I am being challenged to think from 'my brain instead of my ass' by someone who confuses rare failure in the evolutionary design of procreation with high failure percentage in a manipulated genetic defect setting? Using horror story news accounts (which I could more than match), instead of scientific validation?
Perhaps you could point out how anything I said hinders "love, hope, compassion and understanding" because of a person's sexuality.<quoted text> Perhaps a shrink could help you see that love, hope, compassion and understanding are not bound by a persons sexuality.
"The mind of a bigot is like the pupil of the eye; the more light you pour upon it, the more it will contract."
Oliver Wendell Holmes
Additionally, the definition of a bigot is;
[big-uht] Show IPA
a person who is utterly intolerant of any differing creed, belief, or opinion.
My post was about facts, not creed, belief or opinion. I would suggest that it is your response that fits the definition of bigot more accurately.
A wild guess would be this is why you have a problem with the word marriage too.