Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Judged:

6

6

6

KiMare wrote:

<quoted text>
I will be judged for seeking the best for children.
You will be judged for DELIBERATELY promoting children birthed apart from a parent and a gender.
I'm willing to risk God's opinion about which of us is using children.

Judged:

6

5

5

KiMare wrote:

<quoted text>
Every hear of the 'Cinderella effect'?
It is a interesting combination of evolution and proof that a step/adoptive parent can never match a birth parent.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cinderella_effec...
I know it's wiki, but the end lists a number of specific studies.
Smile.

Judged:

6

5

5

KiMare wrote:

<quoted text>
Once again you show your brokenness. Bigotry of religion by trying to judge something you know nothing about (ignorance).
Moses had one wife.
But to my point of brokenness, but not in you; The Bible makes it clear many times of Moses' brokennesss. Murder, anger and more.

Judged:

7

7

7

Cheyenne277 wrote:

<quoted text>Keep dreaming.

Even in those states they still refer to it as gay marriage, whether it's legal or not.

Judged:

7

7

7

Laughing at a moron wrote:

<quoted text>Duck, bob, weave and spin! So how many people don't agree with you? There are many more than three here.

Huummm?

Judged:

7

7

7

Rick in Kansas wrote:

<quoted text>Actually dear, it's the other way around. Other than the recent vote in North Carolina (and no real surprise there), you people have been on a pretty bad losing streak, as more states have recognized the marriage of same sex couples than denied recognition. The tide of public opinion and the Courts have been coming over to our side when discrimination against us is challenged and there isn't a damn thing you can do about it beyond whining. Your place as an embarrassment to America's history has been assured as future generations, long use to the marriages of same sex couples, will be scratching their heads and wondering what in the hell was the matter with people like you.

Judged:

6

6

6

Bill Of Rights wrote:

<quoted text>
Lets take "Gods" opinion into court and watch you laughed out of the room! Secular country! I love your bumper sticker mentality! LOL,Just like Brian's,and just as worthless! But judge,God said.....LOL

Judged:

5

5

5

Here Is One wrote:

<quoted text>
and people refer to the peso here as dollars..........LOL
But we know they are not

Judged:

6

6

5

akpilot wrote:

Came and passed? Have you ever read the Constitution, the Federal Congress is irrelevant, the states don't need them to Amend the Constitution.

Judged:

6

6

6

Cheyenne277 wrote:

<quoted text>
But that's not the argument. The argument is whether the world's 4 plus million orphans are going to do better with adoptive parents or being raised in institutions.

Judged:

6

6

5

KiMare wrote:

<quoted text>
Hey not so bright, I was responding to your buddies warning about judgment.
I just went to the highest court.
Smile.

Judged:

7

7

6

Here Is One wrote:

the score is 31 to 5
You are losing badly

Judged:

6

5

5

KiMare wrote:

<quoted text>
No they don't.

Judged:

6

5

5

Rick in Kansas wrote:

<quoted text>Your chances of getting two-thirds of the states to call for a Constitutional Convention are even more remote than getting a two thirds vote in Congress, that's why I didn't even bother mentioning the option.

Judged:

6

5

5

akpilot wrote:

<quoted text>
BTW, the Constitution is "carved in stone."

Judged:

6

5

5

KiMare wrote:

<quoted text>
You speak with forked tongue, Indian.
You challenged me to verify.
I did.
You can't.
You make me smile.
And smile.
And smile.

Judged:

5

5

5

Here Is One wrote:

I read about 100 papers per day

Judged:

6

6

6

Cheyenne277 wrote:

<quoted text>
Despite your smiles you didn't verify anything other than that you'd rather orphaned children be raised by the state in institutions than have actual parents.

Judged:

5

5

5

thisGuy wrote:

<quoted text>
Marry whoever you want, just don't shove it down my throat & expect me to change my mind on your abnormal way of foreplay.

Judged:

6

6

5

RnL2008 wrote:

Especially seeing as a Constitutional Convention has NEVER been done before to change the Constitution.