Study blasts fears over global warming

JRS wrote:

<quoted text>
Jesus would do nothing about the AGW crisis scam.

Remember the flowers in the field....

Christian Soldier wrote:

<quoted text>
What facts? Your wack Australian scientist as reported in a Murdock owned rag?

This scientist is an accredited climotoligist. he has been very vocal in the past in favor of manmade GW. Was he a wack then as well or was that a transformation which occurred when he had the ordacity to disagree with such a well schooled and knowledgeable elitist such as yuorself? he obviously is far from a crackpot if he has written a ptrogram to track the emissions for an entire country. Your posts are beginning to resemble nothing more nor less than the rants of a convicte dmurderer on his way to death row. "they framed me", "that witness is a liar", " "I didn't di it". You are nothing short of pathetic.

another-peace-nic wrote:

<quoted text>
So it is official: GWB is doing “God’s work” and JRS speaks for Jesus. I guess the rest of us should just shut up.

I like your theory but then we wouldn't get the chance to illustrate to the masses just how uninformed and close minded most GW buffs are. hell every so often you even dig up an ocassional good link that isn't to the wiki world of wonder!!!!

MDJ wrote:

<quoted text>This scientist is an accredited climotoligist. he has been very vocal in the past in favor of manmade GW. Was he a wack then as well or was that a transformation which occurred when he had the ordacity to disagree with such a well schooled and knowledgeable elitist such as yuorself? he obviously is far from a crackpot if he has written a ptrogram to track the emissions for an entire country. Your posts are beginning to resemble nothing more nor less than the rants of a convicte dmurderer on his way to death row. "they framed me", "that witness is a liar", " "I didn't di it". You are nothing short of pathetic.

Dude, I didn't go to any form of "elite" school. I just read a lot and use my deductive powers to weed through the crap guys like you except as gospel because it matches your "stern parent" and paranoid world view.

I'm sorry your Daddy used to come home drunk when you were a kid and beat Mommy around the house.

When a lot of scientist start "flipping" on this matter, I'll be more than happy to admit I was wrong. In the meantime I still see a clear and cogent relationship between climate change and human activity.

another-peace-nic wrote:

<quoted text>
So it is official: GWB is doing “God’s work” and JRS speaks for Jesus. I guess the rest of us should just shut up.

Very curious how the AGW crisis peddlers do not think. I said Jesus would not do anything about the AGW crisis after Republicans R Bogus wrote:
That’s what Jesus would do.
Wouldn't the logical statement be that Republicans R Bogus speaks for Jesus?
Very curious how the AGW crisis peddler ignore certain fellow crisis peddler comments and then focus on the skeptic and denier comments.

Very similar to the way the peddlers ignore much climate science only to repeat the AGW crisis shtick.

"The United Nations has rejected all attempts by a group of dissenting scientists seeking to present information at the climate change conference taking place in Bali, Indonesia.

The International Climate Science Coalition (ICSC) has been denied the opportunity to present at panel discussions, side events, and exhibits; its members were denied press credentials. The group consists of distinguished scientists from Africa, Australia, India, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

The scientists, citing pivotal evidence on climate change published in peer-reviewed journals, have expressed their opposition to the UN's alarmist theory of anthropogenic global warming. As the debate on man-made global warming has been heating up, the UN has tried to freeze out the scientists and new evidence, summarily dismissing them with the claim "the science is settled."

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm...

JRS wrote:

<quoted text>
Very curious how the AGW crisis peddlers do not think. I said Jesus would not do anything about the AGW crisis after Republicans R Bogus wrote:
That’s what Jesus would do.
Wouldn't the logical statement be that Republicans R Bogus speaks for Jesus?
Very curious how the AGW crisis peddler ignore certain fellow crisis peddler comments and then focus on the skeptic and denier comments...

You are right; we should not take Republicans R Bogus’s attempts to speak for Jesus serious either.

Funny though, you saying,“Very curious how the AGW crisis peddler ignore certain fellow crisis peddler comments and then focus on the skeptic and denier comments.” You of course would never ignore a fellow “skeptic” saying anything dumb, would you?

JRS wrote:

<quoted text>
...Very similar to the way the peddlers ignore much climate science only to repeat the AGW crisis shtick.
"The United Nations has rejected all attempts by a group of dissenting scientists seeking to present information at the climate change conference taking place in Bali, Indonesia.
The International Climate Science Coalition (ICSC) has been denied the opportunity to present at panel discussions, side events, and exhibits; its members were denied press credentials. The group consists of distinguished scientists from Africa, Australia, India, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, and the United States.
The scientists, citing pivotal evidence on climate change published in peer-reviewed journals, have expressed their opposition to the UN's alarmist theory of anthropogenic global warming. As the debate on man-made global warming has been heating up, the UN has tried to freeze out the scientists and new evidence, summarily dismissing them with the claim "the science is settled."
http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm...

Dragging this out again? Hasn’t it been pointed out enough times that there were no both for “AGW crisis peddlers” allowed either?

Abbey Yoyo wrote:

<quoted text>
And for that reason someone will be punished eternally? Doesn't make sense to me.

How dense can you be. It has nothing to do with this perosn or that being condemmed to hell. It is a saying to remind people that they should think before they act. The reason they should think before they do something that even with the best of intentions the act itself might cause great harm.

Abbey Yoyo wrote:

<quoted text>
I don't think anyone believes that ALL the world's problems can be resolved with dialog, but the U.S.'s policy pre-shrub was only to bomb a nation that had attacked us first. Most people, shrub and company excluded, think of war as a last option. You are exaggerating which only makes you look less thoughtful.

Really, how about back in the 1940's with both japan and nazi's. Both conducted preemptive attacks. There are other cases that are more modern that involved one group/nation conducting attacks on another group/nation. While the US normally dosn't conduct pre emptive attacks it was never off the table. Even Clinton did it with a Chemical Weapon Plant/Asprin Factory.

Also using the term shrub makes you look less thoughtful as well.

Republicans R Bogus wrote:

Lord, even Bush now agrees about Global Warming, the next step is what we do about it. All Faiths need to pray for guidance and then act.

They prayed and scourged themselves during the black plague. They burned people at the stake too, and one-third the population of Europe still died horrible deaths.

Thats is what Jesus/God wants us to do, help God solve this.

Why does your god need the help of his creatures?

As a Christian, I think we need to be 10 times more agressive than Al Gore.

What does that mean?

JRS wrote:

<quoted text>

You say: "Jesus stated quite clearly that ALL of the old testament was to be observed."
Where did he say "ALL"?

Matt.5
[17] Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.

tina anne wrote:

<quoted text>
Really, how about back in the 1940's with both japan and nazi's. Both conducted preemptive attacks.

But the U.S. did not. That was my point.

While the US normally dosn't conduct pre emptive attacks it was never off the table. Even Clinton did it with a Chemical Weapon Plant/Asprin Factory.

You're saying the bombing of that factory is the same as the invasion of Iraq? Where is your sense of proportion?

Also using the term shrub makes you look less thoughtful as well.

It's an homage to the late great Molly Ivins.

Abbey Yoyo wrote:

<quoted text>
Matt.5
[17] Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.

Try again

Abbey Yoyo wrote:

<quoted text>
But the U.S. did not. That was my point.
<quoted text>
You're saying the bombing of that factory is the same as the invasion of Iraq? Where is your sense of proportion?
<quoted text>
It's an homage to the late great Molly Ivins.

So we finally got off our butts and decided to play like the rest of the world. Yes, I know we waited till we were attacked in WWII and look at the body count. People who think the Iraq deathcount looks high ought to take a look at how many died during the invasion of Normandy. How how many died in the two nuclear blasts in japan.

As far as the sense of proportion, it depends on if your the guy holding the guy or the guy looking down the barrel as to the sense of propertion. To the guy looking down the barrel the thing is huge while to the guy firing it that bullet is small. Either way it is still the same. It dosn't matter if it is a small one or the size of a car. Same there. Preemptive is preemptive. In this case it also involved faulty intel.

Imagine that, Bush and Clinton have something in common.

Christian Soldier wrote:

<quoted text>
No - according to Biblical law any work on the Sabbath is a direct violation of God's law, punishable by death. You just want to cherry pick what works for your needs. I was using WalMart as a typical site of violation, but McDonald's, where you work, is fine too. I know how dare I insult a fine food establishment like Mickey D's. They would never hire you.
Global Warming - You'll live to rue the day you believed those that have kept us in inaction during this critical window of opportunity to slow if not change the process.

Again, old testament by jews for jews.

Christian Soldier wrote:

<quoted text>
Dude, I didn't go to any form of "elite" school. I just read a lot and use my deductive powers to weed through the crap guys like you except as gospel because it matches your "stern parent" and paranoid world view.
I'm sorry your Daddy used to come home drunk when you were a kid and beat Mommy around the house.
When a lot of scientist start "flipping" on this matter, I'll be more than happy to admit I was wrong. In the meantime I still see a clear and cogent relationship between climate change and human activity.

many have, and many more never bought off in the first place. I don't know about your two dads but my mother and father are germanic. Germans wobble but they don't get drunk; and we surely have better things to do with women than use then as punching bags. thats why we have many children, we practice a lot and as you know practice makes perfect. Perhaps you should practice being objective rather than subjective. It's obvious that you don't do it often because you do it so poorly.

This is all so perfect; another skeptic contributor to these forums proves himself to be an absolute lunatic.

Its all coming out now MDJ eh? The comments about Jews and your assertion that Germans are superior, someone said that sort of thing before. Newsflash; Germans do get drunk and they are more into dodgy electronic music these days.

I await your explanation of how what I am thinking is not what your saying.

Waz wrote:

This is all so perfect; another skeptic contributor to these forums proves himself to be an absolute lunatic.
Its all coming out now MDJ eh? The comments about Jews and your assertion that Germans are superior, someone said that sort of thing before. Newsflash; Germans do get drunk and they are more into dodgy electronic music these days.
I await your explanation of how what I am thinking is not what your saying.

This comment has absolutely nothing to do with the topic.
So what id the Deutschers like their elctro-funk music... Better than what coming out of the UK these days.

Waz wrote:

This is all so perfect; another skeptic contributor to these forums proves himself to be an absolute lunatic.
Its all coming out now MDJ eh? The comments about Jews and your assertion that Germans are superior, someone said that sort of thing before. Newsflash; Germans do get drunk and they are more into dodgy electronic music these days.
I await your explanation of how what I am thinking is not what your saying.

I must have been correct about drunken Daddy beating the crap out of Mommy.

His first first tactic is to call me gay. This is because he has problems with impotency stemming from feelings of helplessness as he watched Daddy beat Mommy.

The Germanic reference is about Daddy's drug of choice; beer. Also inherent in this reference is the imagery of powerful jackbooted men who can not be stopped.

Republicans always have a world view based on the "stern father" who is usually little more than a tyrant who victimizes his children with sudden and unpredictable acts of violence.

To cope with this Republicans must control others, dictating how they live. They must exist in a world where each individual is for him or herself. After all if you can't trust the father who is supposed to support protect and love you - why believe in anyone.

The problem is that Repugs want to act out their vengeance fantasies on the rest of us.

That's why the go into a Unitarian Church and kill innocents.

Christian Soldier wrote:

<quoted text>
I must have been correct about drunken Daddy beating the crap out of Mommy.
His first first tactic is to call me gay. This is because he has problems with impotency stemming from feelings of helplessness as he watched Daddy beat Mommy.
The Germanic reference is about Daddy's drug of choice; beer. Also inherent in this reference is the imagery of powerful jackbooted men who can not be stopped.
Republicans always have a world view based on the "stern father" who is usually little more than a tyrant who victimizes his children with sudden and unpredictable acts of violence.
To cope with this Republicans must control others, dictating how they live. They must exist in a world where each individual is for him or herself. After all if you can't trust the father who is supposed to support protect and love you - why believe in anyone.
The problem is that Repugs want to act out their vengeance fantasies on the rest of us.
That's why the go into a Unitarian Church and kill innocents.

Talk about the pot calling the kettle black...
I've read most of your posts - you are exactly what you hate in the "Repugs"...
But you won't see it that way.