Why do rednecks deny evolution

i mean they look more like apes than most people anyway

You şǜçk at trolling.

LOL
I was trying to say that yousuckedat trolling...
I guess Isuckat posting.

Cont..,

So the brightest light we find in the cosmos will be the beginning point, while CERN is an experiment in a contained setting like that which we developed the age identification called Carbon 14 Dating which is measured in downgrade -14 but has not been measured in the upgrade of 14+ with the + being on the right of 14 and the - being on the left of 14 which shows an upgrade or a downgrade such as wood to ash after it is burnt, the ash would have less carbon than the wood. CERN then has a measurement of illuminational tracking which at this point is not necessary to illustrate as Carbon 14 Dating is a good illustration for that purpose, but there is a problem with the CERN and that is we walked into a pitch black room while CERN is measuring from a pitch black cosmos bearing particles of light however, like the cosmos the room was pitch black meaning that whatever occurred at this point shows the fact that there was nothing just pitch black. Now two atoms violate all manner of science in the lab and violate everything we know in any argument about "nothing" and for example sake let's suppose we allow the two impossibles at this moment - we have what is called the table of elements which most of you are familiar with from high school and college and it stands at above, I believe 125 - 140 known elements to mankind and an element is the basic building block of everything bar none and the atoms have a property of gas, wood, metal, flesh etc..,. Now we have the problem of exactly what property levels were contained in these two atoms, was it hydrogen, nitrogen, oxygen and so on. We have concocted Nuclear, Proton, Helium as into a mega tons of explosive power none of which has or could generate the amount of power it would take to blow such a hole and force into the black pitch with the evidence and magnitude we see in the cosmos today this is why that Carl Sagan revised his theory often of billions and billions of thousands of years of the big bang boom or explosion. A few years ago the scientists held the theory that the universe was exploding and imploding much like that of a ripple of water or the ocean, they held this until another scientist who happened to be a Christian asked why the ripple came back as in imploding and they turned to the ripple and stated the ripple effect was in play, but he explained the ripple was returning because of the bank of dirt or sand that caused the return and then asked what is that bank or wall and what lies beyond that wall.

START:

In the beginning of the bang men denote that two atoms colliding into each other and through much internal combustion created an explosion, however, when I have conferred with the scientists they admit that they have not much proof if any and I'll go a little farther and state they have none. First off in the lab one must show how anything can develop from a true nothing and if the assertion is that it could then we must change the definition of nothing to something and if something then we must conclude that it had to develop from someone or thing and if it is a thing then we must conclude it came from a someone. Now you may ask, but who created that someone, let's make it just a little more to the point if God created all things then where did God come from and where did that God come from and where did that God come from...well way back there in the "where dids" there must have been a someone that did it all, so how do we rationalize that someone as alway in existence in our finite minds, well we have to have a shift in what we think. CERN the particle deseminator in Europe is trying to chase down where the first light came into it's intial "burst" if you will and will they map it, of course, if they could not they would not be very good at their trade, however, if you go into a dark room that is described by "pitch dark" and you light a candle then you can tell at what point that candle was the brightest by it's photon display of brightest point. In other words, it will be the brightest at the point of ignition for obvious reasons but if you walk out in the very brightest of the day when the sun makes you squinge from the light, and you light a candle then the person three doors down will not discern the bright of the candle as the background does not "force" it like the dark does or will.