Muslims must combat hate speech

Passers by wrote:

between 2001 and 2008, there are iraq and afganistan.... and blood of countless muslims.
Someone's view may change after seeing all these.

Judged:

1

Az Zaqqum wrote:

"Just as Aulaqi is using his influence to incite Muslims in the west to violence it is essential that we see continuing efforts by credible Muslim scholars – with far more impressive Islamic learning – to forcefully speak out against indiscriminate violence and in favour of democratic and peaceful engagement"
Ok, so the question is...are there credible muslim scholars who have spoke out about this terrorists? Which sura and aya would they use to say this is wrong?
I don't know of any sura or aya that would condem this terrorist. No where in the quran does it forbid muslims from killing non muslims if they 'feel' muslims are being oppressed by non muslims.
You're stuck with the words of your book. It almost seems as if allah wants you to be disliked by the majority of the Non muslim world. So, you're always going to feel some muslim in some part of the world is being oppressed by a Non muslim.

wheres the peace wrote:

<quoted text>Muslims lives taken more by there fellow muslims then anyone else,
and I care about those muslim lives You don't ! If you did you would stop being to damn arrogant and proud eager to blame everything on non muslims and you would find the courage to face whats WRONG IN ISLAM SO THAT IT CAN BE FIXED IF THATS EVEN POSSIBLE! I cared enough!!! How about you try it?

Passers by wrote:

"The man who killed an innocent, as if he killed the whole mankind, and the man who saved an innocent, as if he saved the whole mankind"
It is for the Fort Hood shooter... as well as the US Govt itself.
There are many things that AzZakkum don't know, or want to know.

Passers by wrote:

"The man who killed an innocent, as if he killed the whole mankind, and the man who saved an innocent, as if he saved the whole mankind"
It is for the Fort Hood shooter... as well as the US Govt itself.
There are many things that AzZakkum don't know, or want to know.

Passers by wrote:

<quoted text>
You are partially right. but have you considered the 'non-muslims' started the game and spending billions of dollars everyday to run the ugly show?

ExMuslim wrote:

Az Zaqqum, go easy on "Passers by", these idiot converts do not yet realize there are more Ex-Muslims than there are converts.

ExMuslim wrote:

<quoted text>
That is a hypocritical ayiat from Quran because the same Quran commands to kill non-Muslims.

Az Zaqqum wrote:

<quoted text>
You know nothing!!
That single aya was given to the JEWS!!
I know EVERYTHING that is FORBIDDEN by allah, and there is NOTHING that forbids muslims from killing NON muslims or the so called un-believers!
In fact, there are more ayats that support the killing of the un-believers than there are to live in peace with them!
Another fact, it is FORBIDDEN for a muslim to kill a believing muslim. The muslim army terrorist believes the taliban are good 'believing' muslims!
Got anything else?

Judged:

1

Az Zaqqum wrote:

<quoted text>
And how many angolas are fighting the taliban?
You think they are good muslims, right?

ExMuslim wrote:

Az Zaqqum, go easy on "Passers by", these idiot converts do not yet realize there are more Ex-Muslims than there are converts.

Judged:

2

1

1

Passers by wrote:

<quoted text>
I think talibans are better than the americans in a way that they didn't attack other country with a lame excuses. they are fighting to liberate their own country from the foreign occupiers. So they are 'good' muslim in that sense.

Passers by wrote:

<quoted text>
My friend, you misread me. I am not a convert, a muslim to the bone. But I guess you are not a ex-muslim, because all ex-muslim I know have better knowledge than you. because at lest they know when you read some verses you have to consider its 'Shan-e-nuzul'.
When you read the 'war verses' you should read its 'shan-e-nuzul' also. then everything will be clear to you. And you will discober that it is a tolarent religion even in a situation like war.

Arnold wrote:

<quoted text>
Did you know that Mullah Omar, the leader of the Taliban, is not even an Afghani? He's Pakistani. Did you know that Pakistan supported him so that they could influence Afghanistan? Did you know that the attacks against the Taliban in the invasion were actually performed by Afghanis themselves while the US gave them air support?
The Taliban had no right or anything even close to any mandate to rule that land, and again, half of them aren't even Afghanis. So, did the Taliban ask the Afghanis whether they wanted them to rule or offer the people any sort of referendum? No, of course not. They did it the Islamic way. Violent revolution. So to say that the Taliban has any legitimacy at all is absolute nonsense. They just happened to be the strongest thug at the time, that's all. That's the way things work in the uncivilized Middle East. And after they gained control, they offered no referendums where the people's voices could be heard, which is a superior offer the US gave them. So go back to the people that tell you these little fairy tales about Taliban legitimacy and ask them why they lie to you so much.