August 23 Florida Primary Election: Will you vote?

lumps wrote:

<quoted text>
bunk

Judged:

1

1

1

VET wrote:

Like I said O Bama is going to be the next president and there ain't a dam thing you can do about it.

Judged:

1

1

1

obama my vote wrote:

obama least he for the poor.
we the middle class and poor need to stop going to the nba the nascar football all sports. put them in the poor house.see how they like that. to all
fans let pull together and stop going to all sports.this will put players in the red romney ryan
4 the rich. sports makes alot of the rich just that rich.see how they like ol mitt then

Judged:

1

1

1

VET wrote:

I no longer support the feudalistic government of America.

Judged:

1

1

1

Get er Done wrote:

I'm voting GOP all the way, and telling those democraps to kiss my grits! If you don't vote, you are giving your only American right away, and if you don't vote, don't gripe about what happens. Only our vote will make a true change, one we can live with.

Judged:

1

1

1

Burt wrote:

<quoted text>Those who understand that America is now on the wrong track cannot reasonably vote for Obama in November, because he is absolutely unwilling to change, perhaps even ideologically incapable of changing, course. Evidence abounds.

First, consider his disastrous economic record and his rejection of any semblance of a course change. He and his economic advisers told us his stimulus would keep unemployment below 8 percent. It didn't. He didn't consider for a second that his policies exacerbated the economic crisis. He blamed Bush and said that if anything, he -- Obama -- hadn't spent enough. He demanded more stimulus packages -- high-speed rail, other infrastructure, American Jobs Act. He continued to grow government in a wide variety of areas; things continued to get worse. No sign of any significant economic recovery; we had the worst recovery in 50 years. No sign of unemployment relief. He didn't change course.

Despite his failed performance, he told us in 2009 that only the government could break this business cycle. He told us in Osawatomie, Kan., that the private sector couldn't lead us back to economic vitality on its own. Recently, he told us that successful entrepreneurs didn't build their businesses -- or roads or bridges or whatever claptrap he pretended to have meant. He refuses to reconsider his flawed notions. Arrogance, as much as ignorance.

If you think that despite all this, Obama may have learned his lesson and will change course going forward, you are fooling yourself. Obama won't change his economic policies, because he is addicted to spending and to growing government on several levels. His economic philosophy, his ideology and his political survival demand that he stay the course.

He firmly believes that only government spending -- Keynesian pump priming -- can stimulate a moribund economy. He believes it to the point that he's willing to bankrupt the nation to do it. His philosophy countenances no other alternative methods of recovery, specifically letting the private sector breathe and recover on its own. That's the economic philosophy component.

He also knows that the most efficient way to redistribute wealth and otherwise reallocate resources from groups he believes less deserving to those he believes more deserving is through an increasingly progressive tax code and more government spending. That is, even if he shared the ordinary American's debt aversion and reasonable anxiety about our horrifying financial predicament, he wouldn't discontinue (hasn't discontinued) his pursuit of ever-greater taxing and spending, because to do so would be tantamount to abandoning his quest, his obsession to fundamentally transform America. That's the ideological component.

Finally, he fully realizes that even if he didn't firmly believe in expanding the welfare state -- incentivizing states to expand their food stamp rolls, extending unemployment benefits, sabotaging welfare reform, increasing the percentage of people not paying income taxes and otherwise presiding over the unprecedented swelling of the welfare state and those dependent on government aid of one form or another -- he would still be compelled to continue expanding it because he believes a great majority of his constituents depend on this expansion. He couldn't win re-election without doing so. That's the political component.
The bottom line is this: If you like Obama's record, vote for him, because you're only going to get more of it -- way more if he wins and thinks he has a mandate.

Judged:

1

1

1

Old Maid wrote:

I will be voting for Rick Scott. He has promised to ship 'em all back. Could it be? Or is he just blowing smoke?

Judged:

1

1

1

obama my vote wrote:

least he for the poor.

Judged:

1

1

1

HC Resident75 wrote:

<quoted text>
Of course he's for the poor. Thanks to him we're all poor now!!! Four more years of his reign and the United States will be a third world country.

David W Harbin wrote:

OBAMA***HOLDER***SOROS***WOLF
TRACKING WOLF TO BLACK SHEEP SHEPHERDS:
http://panamaed.wordpress.com
See how all this ties to the Panama City, Fl MOB too.

TenThousandDollarReward wrote:

OBAMA***HOLDER***SOROS***WOLF
TRACKING WOLF TO BLACK SHEEP SHEPHERDS:
http://panamaed.wordpress.com
See how all this ties to the Panama City, Fl MOB...and much more... and read about this death threatening, perverted, libelous, identity thieving, stalker with tie to Law Enforcement AND THE MOB!