what should the fate of Larry Weitzman be?

Judged:

2

2

1

Janet L wrote:

How can some of you so viciously attack Larry Weitzman for his viewpoints on cars, etc! Plus, he's not a drug dealer - I have known him for over 20 years - he hasn't been convicted of anything - he represented someone in what he thought was a legitimate business deal and he didn't know all the details - and now you're going around calling him a drug dealer - which is insane because you don't even know the man.
I know him! He's a great guy, a family man - a hard worker, caring -- and yes, he's honest! It's unbelievable that just because you don't like his POV on cars (of all things!) that you would call him a drug dealer!
If you don't like him or the Mountain Democrat, why don't you do yourselves a favor and read something else - the only harm you're doing is to yourselves - all that hate is bound to affect you!

doinkster wrote:

<quoted text>What on Earth did he think he was doing for these drug dealers??Everything I have read about his case sounds like he must have known what was going on or else he is a complete simpleton.It would be pretty easy to believe that the man is an idiot but being that he has a law degree I find it hard to believe that he is THAT stupid.His dishonest car reviews should tell you a little bit about the man's character or lack there of.Maybe you should pick your friends a little more carefully.His insult laced commentary on global warming should show you what a piece of human filth he is also.I am not a complete believer in human caused global warming and don't think that we should sign on to the kyoto agreement.The reason I don't buy into it is that there is no consensus amoung climate scientists.My point is that nobody knows for sure if it is caused by man or not including Larry.The fact that he doesn't know doesn't stop him from labeling everone that disagrees with him as idiots,morons and worse.Have you ever even read the trash that he writes.When he has no facts to back up his point of view he simply resorts to name calling.The insulting terms that I have chosen to use in my post here are ones that Larry has used over and over in his writing so I feel no guilt in using them to describe this man.

Sandy wrote:

I went through three years of law school with Larry, studied for the Bar with him, and was sworn in on the same day as Larry, both of us having passed the exam on the first try when the average passing rate at that time was less than 50%. He was no dummy having graduated from UCLA and Loyola Law School, becoming an attorney at the age of 25. I kept up with him for a few years after that. I never knew Larry to do a mean, hostile or illegal act. He was the first to volunteer his notes, etc. to someone who missed class. He lent his friends money and never made anything of it if they didn't pay him back. I don't know what has happened to Larry during these many intervening years but I was shocked to read about his current situation because it did not describe the person I once knew.