'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate

What wrote:

<quoted text>Romney is a coward and a draft dodger.
He is a fraud and a Liar.
You are a wuss like him.
Lmfao

...you believe that, than there is no need for a answer! idiot!

Hey wrote:

President Barack Obama,
The former editor of the Harvard Law
Review, is no longer a "lawyer".
He surrendered his license back in 2008 in order to escape charges he lied on his bar application.
A "Voluntary Surrender" is not something where you decide "Gee, a license is not really something I need anymore, is it?" and forget to renew your license No.
A "Voluntary Surrender" is something you do
when you've been accused of something, and you 'voluntarily surrender" your license five seconds before the state suspends you.

...the reason is obama went to "occidental", they specialise in teaching how to destroy the free world....this is the reason why he won't let his records be known!!

OH BOY wrote:

<quoted text>
What do you think is in those tax records? I know... how many american jobs he out sourcedced, I bet. Yep, that has to be it. Tax records will show that.

....what is in obam's records? why dont you think he won't show them?....if its fair for mit, why not obama?

john wrote:

<quoted text>....what is in obam's records? why dont you think he won't show them?....if its fair for mit, why not obama?

********

Because Obama is a fraud. He runs around yelling to his followers that Romney needs to be more of an "OPEN BOOK" while this man has paid lawyers to seal his records from the public...all his records!!! He's nothing but a joke, and speaks with a "forked tongue."

Obama thinks the rich should keep the poor..

Romney thinks the poor should have enough income to support themselves..

I'll pick the latter..

Obama is the Welfarian POTUS and his policies just prove the fact..

American Lady wrote:

2012 Democratic National Convention Schedule
4:00 PM – Opening Flag Burning Ceremony
4:05 PM – Singing of "God Damn America" led by Rev. Jeremiah Wright
4:10 PM – Pledge of Allegiance to Obama
4:15 PM – Ceremonial 'I hate America' led by Michelle Obama
4:30 PM – Tips on Dodging Sniper Fire – Hillary Clinton
4:45 PM – Obama Receives Oscar for BEST ACTOR from George Clooney,
Whoopi Goldberg, & Oprah
5:00 PM – UFO Abduction Survival – Joe Biden
5:30 PM – Eliot Spitzer Speaks on "Family Values" via Satellite
5:45 PM – Tribute to All 57 States
6:00 PM – Joe Biden Delivers 100,000-Word Speech Featuring 23-Minute
Question and 2-Hour Answer
8:30 PM – Airing of Grievances by the Clintons
9:00 PM – Bill Clinton Delivers Rousing Endorsement of Obama
9:15 PM – Tribute Film to Freedom Fighters at Gitmo – Michael Moore
9:45 PM – Integrity and Personal Finance Seminar - Charlie Rangle
10:00 PM – Denunciation of misguided Gun Owners
10:30 PM – Ceremonial Waving of White Flag for IRAQ, & Afghanistan
11:00 PM – Obama Energy Plan Symposium/Tire Gauge Demonstration
11:15 PM – Crucifixion of Sheriff Joseph M. "Joe" Arpaio
11:30 PM – Obama Accepts Tony and Latin Grammy Awards
11:45 PM – Feeding of the Delegates with 5 Loaves and 2 Fish – Obama Presiding
12:00 AM – Official Nomination of Obama by Bill Mahr
12:01 AM – Obama Accepts Nomination as Lord and Savior
12:05 AM – Public Display of Forged Hawaii Birth Certificate
3:00 AM – Biden Delivers Acceptance Speech
==========
;-)

I LOVE this! Thanks for posting it.

frank wrote:

<quoted text>
Don't take my word for it look at the numbers
http://zfacts.com/

Your link (I visited it) seems to be more propaganda than facts. I have already found the numbers. You might want to see the data with no opinions, slants or otherwise 'spin.' I supply the link below:

http://www.skymachines.com/US-National-Debt-P...

frank wrote:

<quoted text>
Then document your lunacy, document your gossip, lies and innuendo directed at Mr. Obama. You can’t document any of your infantile accusations! Quite obviously if your GOPer theory was correct two Bush tax-cuts would not have resulted in the most severe recession to hit the USA not to mention the huge losses in revenue!

Yeah,,,,,,,,,,
That old saying applies perfectly to you.
Opinions are like A-Holes,everybody has one.
Or is one,,,in your case.

Hey wrote:

Obama thinks the rich should keep the poor..
Romney thinks the poor should have enough income to support themselves..
I'll pick the latter..
Obama is the Welfarian POTUS and his policies just prove the fact..

Romney is a draft dodging coward who likes to create jobs in China and chain Dogs to the roof of his Car.

Brad wrote:

<quoted text>
Yeah,,,,,,,,,,
That old saying applies perfectly to you.
Opinions are like A-Holes,everybody has one.
Or is one,,,in your case.

Another retarded Repug Jack ass.

Jay wrote:

<quoted text>
********
Because Obama is a fraud. He runs around yelling to his followers that Romney needs to be more of an "OPEN BOOK" while this man has paid lawyers to seal his records from the public...all his records!!! He's nothing but a joke, and speaks with a "forked tongue."

Romney has off shore Bank Accounts because he loves America.

Lmfao

Hey wrote:

<quoted text>
No that is the reality!!!
Do you honestly think this country is headed in the right direction with Obama?
Do you not understand that he is intentionally trying to hurt this country?
Among other things he's trying to do away with oil drilling(Over Here)..
Funny I didn't hear one mention of the Keystone Pipeline come from Obamas lips last night..
How about his "jobs czar" GE's Jeffrey Immelt signing a deal with the Chinese last year to build jets in China to compete against America's Boeing?
How about the 2.38 Billion Dollars of the stimulus Obama gave to foreign companies,Isn't that basically outsourcing?

Hey space cowboy you don’t actually believe this sort of insane www idiocy? If you believe anything you read on the web I got one for you – keep riding that pink unicorn!

Members of Congress are reportedly beginning impeachment against Barack Obama based on the grounds of unauthorized military trying to deport all white people to Kenya.
According to Congressional representatives Barack Obama is violating the rules that clearly state that the President must seek Congressional approval before using military force. Sources close to aides in Congress say the law clearly states “any use of military force by Obama without explicit consent and authorization of Congress constitutes an impeachable high crime and misdemeanor under article II, Section 4 of the Constitution.”

The Republicans want to know how President Obama was able to use military force in Libya last year and wants to use it domestically. Republicans are pushing a resolution through Congress, which has been highly underreported by mainstream media, to look into further actions to be taken upon the President as well as his wife and kids. Since it explicitly states in the Constitution that the President must ask permission from Congress to eat bacon for breakfast in another country, sources say, there is clear cause for impeachment.

Brad wrote:

<quoted text>
Yeah,,,,,,,,,,
That old saying applies perfectly to you.
Opinions are like A-Holes,everybody has one.
Or is one,,,in your case.

Oh come on now, you can do better than that can't you? I realize most of you "lost in the woods" wingnuz are brain damaged because of little bombs going off in your heads every time you hear the name Obama.

O one
B big
A ass
M mistake
A America

frank wrote:

<quoted text>
Oh come on now, you can do better than that can't you? I realize most of you "lost in the woods" wingnuz are brain damaged because of little bombs going off in your heads every time you hear the name Obama.

How can you even ask someone if they can do better than that with your usual weak ass "wingnuz" crap in your Obama post? Why is it that a fool is always the last person to realize that they are a fool, fool?

If it weren't for the Bush excuse poor Frankie wouldn't have any..

Hey Frankie how bout posting something positive Obama has done for the AMERICAN PEOPLE..ANYTHING..

One stipulation(It can't have come at the tax payers expense)Like the GM bailout..

By the time you figure it out Romney will be POTUS.

Na Na Na Na,Na Na Na Na, Come on Frank feel free to join in,LMAO!!!!!

Hey wrote:

If it weren't for the Bush excuse poor Frankie wouldn't have any..
Hey Frankie how bout posting something positive Obama has done for the AMERICAN PEOPLE..ANYTHING..
One stipulation(It can't have come at the tax payers expense)Like the GM bailout..
By the time you figure it out Romney will be POTUS.
Na Na Na Na,Na Na Na Na, Come on Frank feel free to join in,LMAO!!!!!

And then what will happen? Mitt's plans are exact to the same things Bush did. Exact!!! Give the top a tax break and watch the job creation. hahahahahhahaha!!!!!!!!!!

Pentagon admits it has no photo evidence of Bin Laden's death

Pentagon officials recently disclosed to the Associated Press (AP) that they could not find any photo or video evidence to confirm that Al Qaeda leader Osama Bin Laden was killed in the Navy Seal raid in Pakistan a year ago.
AP has submitted more than 20 requests for information surrounding the raid on Bin Laden’s Abbottabad compound to the U.S. Government under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).
In response to the request for visual evidence of Bin Laden’s death, the Pentagon stated that it could not find any pictures or video footage of the raid itself or of Bin Laden’s dead body. It also told AP it could not locate any images of Bin Laden’s body that were taken on the U.S.S. Carl Vinson, the Navy aircraft carrier that reportedly lowered him into the sea after his death.
In addition, the Pentagon admitted that it could not find an autopsy report, death certificate or results of a DNA identification test for Bin Laden, in spite of claims made by President Obama and reported by CBC News that a DNA test was performed.
These admissions follow a related FOIA response by the Department of Defense in February, in which it stated that it had no emails concerning the Bin Laden raid that were sent prior to its execution.
The Atlantic Wire reported in February that the CIA claimed it had visual proof of Bin Laden’s death, but the Pentagon’s admission that it does not have any evidence of this kind still raises significant questions, since its jurisdiction includes the Navy Seals that conducted the raid and the Navy ship that buried Bin Laden at sea.
The latest revelation drew the suspicion of Lt. Col. Robert Bowman (ret.), the former director of Advanced Space Programs Development for the U.S. Air Force.“It makes the official story sound very fishy,” Bowman said in an interview with Digital Journal.“Without proof, I’m not buying it carte blanche.”
Bowman also pointed to the reports that Bin Laden died in 2001 or 2002, which have been supported by former FBI counter-terrorism chief Dale Watson, former assistant Secretary of State Steve Pieczenik, former U.S. foreign intelligence officer Angelo Codevilla and other intelligence experts.“This smacks of a cover-up,” Bowman added.

Read more: http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/323364...

AmericanMan wrote:

<quoted text>And then what will happen? Mitt's plans are exact to the same things Bush did. Exact!!! Give the top a tax break and watch the job creation. hahahahahhahaha!!!!!!!!!!

Well we have learned the hard way what can happen with Obama's policies so wanting Bush's policies back might not be such a bad idea. Bush's policies didn't put a record number of citizens at the poverty level and Bush's policies didn't add millions and millions to the unemployment line and keep them there for 4 years and Bush's policies didn't force every man, woman and child to participate in a government money-making scam and Bush's policies didn't make a record number of citizens depend upon some kind of government assistance. Obama's policies are so bad they make Bush's policies look like that of a rocket scientist.

Obama is a huge failure. Man up and suck it up and do better for your kids future.

AmericanMan wrote:

<quoted text>And then what will happen? Mitt's plans are exact to the same things Bush did. Exact!!! Give the top a tax break and watch the job creation. hahahahahhahaha!!!!!!!!!!

You know honestly at this point I would vote for the fkn Energizer Bunny...

I don't especially like Romney either but 3 1/2yrs of Obama has proven to be a very costly mistake...

We are getting ready to get our asses in the middle of another War.

In my opinion we let the only candidate that truly sees things through the working mans eyes fall to the wayside AGAIN..

Evidently we don't want any better,Like the poster above was talking about voting Lib..

It wouldn't bother me a bit to vote for someone else, But the only thing I keep thinking is that a vote for him may take a vote away from Romney and in the end we will end up with ODUMMER AGAIN..