Doctor heads to court after online sex sting

Judged:

16

16

16

Probe wrote:

<quoted text>
What a surprise, the most obnoxious and hostile commenter is a sniveling coward in person. It must have stung to have Wolin look you in the eyes and own you as you remained silent. Did this happen on a daily basis?
Explains a LOT.

Judged:

12

12

11

scj887634 wrote:

I read from the last page before this and I agree that grown men by nature are all child molesters by heart, only a few rarities that are actually pure-hearted and truly think that sex with minors are wrong and unethical
Some of you internet posters just won't admit to it, and probably never will, but I won't be surprised if I see you get in trouble for messing around with minors in the future.

Judged:

26

26

26

Brittle Fingers wrote:

<quoted text>
You are the king of douchebaggery.

Judged:

18

18

18

Miggy wrote:

I guess I'm in the rare minority. Yea for me!

Judged:

10

10

10

Miggy wrote:

OFF-TOPIC UPDATE ALERT:
Kindle version of my book now available!
http://www.landowonder.com/184.html

Judged:

13

12

12

Brittle Fingers wrote:

<quoted text>
Congrats! I've always wanted to be a novelist.....admiration your way for writing your book!

Judged:

6

6

6

Brittle Fingers wrote:

<quoted text>
Congrats! I've always wanted to be a novelist.....admiration your way for writing your book!

Judged:

9

9

8

x PeeJ wrote:

Court overturns conviction in Craigslist sex sting
A panel of appellate court justices ruled there is “substantial evidence of entrapment” in Gregory Ruiz Aguirre’s case.
By VIK JOLLY / THE ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER
SANTA ANA – An appellate court has overturned the conviction of a man for responding to a bogus Craigslist ad by a Huntington Beach police officer posing as a 13-year-old girl.
The justices ruled there is "substantial evidence of entrapment" in the Aguirre case.
He was one of six men who responded to the Craigslist.org ad – part of an undercover sting operation targeting Internet child predators – by police posing as a 13-year-old girl saying she was looking to make $100.
In May 2010, an officer posted a message in the "Casual Encounters" section of the website. The title of the post read: "Hi wanta play with me 2nite — w4m (hb)," the appellate court's narrative of the incident says.
The body of the message stated: "I want to have fun and mke new friends." The term "w4m (hb)" was intended by the officer to convey the poster was a woman looking for a man in Huntington Beach. More than 100 people, including Aguirre, responded.
DID NOT BELIEVE SHE WAS 13
Aguirre admitted to officers "the female he was meeting had told him she was 13, he had agreed to pay her for sex, and he had brought condoms with him," but he also said "at least once during his interview that he did not think the woman in the photograph sent to him was really 13 years old."
The defendant denied having ever contacted other minors for sex. Police searches of Aguirre's computer and efforts to find other victims did not yield any child pornography, the justices said.
"The police lured defendant into an electronic conversation with Jess without providing any indication at the outset that she was underage ... The police quickly disclosed Jess was 13 years old once defendant contacted her, but in response to defendant's request for a picture of Jess, the police selected a photograph of an attractive and mature female body," the justices said.
"Jess" was first to use sexually explicit comments in responses to their first exchange and following the initial contact, she initiated electronic communication with Aguirre on four separate occasions, they said.
LACK OF ENTRAPMENT INSTRUCTION
In March 2011, jurors at the West Justice Center in Westminster deliberated a couple of hours before finding Aguirre guilty of three felonies, including going to meet a minor for a lewd purpose. He also was convicted of attempted lewd conduct with a minor under 14 and communicating with a minor for a lewd purpose.
Jensen sentenced Aguirre to five years formal probation with the condition a violation would automatically send him to four years in state prison. Aguirre was also ordered to register as a sex offender for life.
"Our analysis suggests the government should not be in the business of testing the will of law-abiding citizens with elaborate (if improbable) fantasies of sensuous teenagers desperate to engage in sexual acts with random middle-aged men," wrote appellate Justice Raymond Ikola, with Justices William Rylaarsdam and Richard Fybel concurring.
The lack of an entrapment instruction "was not harmless, as a more favorable result for defendant was reasonably probable" if it had been provided, the panel said.
"Entrapment is about the actions of the police, not the guilt of defendant," the ruling said.
"Our review of the record suggests a reasonable jury could find that the police conduct would illegitimately ensnare normally law-abiding individuals in an illegal conversation they would not have otherwise pursued," the justices said. "In sum, the jury might have believed the conduct of the police was likely to induce a normally law-abiding person to commit some or all of the charged crimes. We therefore reverse the judgment."
http://www.ocregister.com/articles/aguirre-34...

Judged:

10

10

10

Pig Roast wrote:

<quoted text>
WRONG!
Penal Code section 31.
All persons concerned in the commission of a crime, whether it
be felony or misdemeanor, and whether they directly commit the act
constituting the offense, or aid and abet in its commission, or, not
being present, have advised and encouraged its commission, and all
persons counseling, advising, or encouraging children under the age
of fourteen years, or persons who are mentally incapacitated, to
commit any crime, or who, by fraud, contrivance, or force, occasion
the drunkenness of another for the purpose of causing him to commit
any crime, or who, by threats, menaces, command, or coercion, compel
another to commit any crime, are principals in any crime so
committed.
For some backgound, this section of the chat is after Wolin did not show up at the sting house, and so Xavier Von Erck intiates recontact. If you see any aiding and abetting, or any advising and encouraging, or any coerciion, then Von Erk is a principal to the crime of attempted child molestation. That would mean he is as guilty of atempted child molestation as Wolin was.
WOLIN CHAT LOG – PART SEVEN (CONT’D FROM POST #4206)
(08/25/06 at 5:41PM)
DECOY: u stood me up (taunt)
(FOUR HOURS LATER)
MW: sorry
DECOY: what happen?
MW: I couldn’t do it…youre too young…I wish I could see you
DECOY: what?...but all the suff we talk about?...u promised (pester, harass)
MW: you have to be careful here…im cool…but you could meet some bad people…just be careful
DECOY: well im not tryin to meet bad peeps I tried to meet u…but you don’t like me enuff…(taunt, coax, hound, bedivil) I waited and waited too (persistent)
MW: I know…but you don’t know me…and I do like you a lot
DECOY: I know u tons we talk a lot and u gotta neet car u a doc u cool…(blandish) well if u like me why u ditch?(taunt)
MW: I know…and everything I said was true…but some guys might lie to you
DECOY: I know but im not talkin to some guy im talkin to u…u the guy I talk to…u a doc u cute u it all (blandish, to coax with flattery)
MW: I know baby…and youre really hot
DECOY: thanks so whats the prob? We talk so much I mean I though u were the best (coax, pester)
MW: I just don’t want either of us to get into trouble
DECOY: lol if we smart we get in no troubs (persistent, solicit, claims of not being detected)
MW: lets talk more here
DECOY: okay but don’t be a player k?...(coax, pester, harass) cause I like you lots and I don’t wanna be lied to (coax, pester, harass)
more:
www.corrupted-justice.com/forums/viewtopic.ph...
And so we all know who the decoy was.
The REAL Xavier Von Erck - YouTube
19 Jul 2007 ... Ever wonder what he is really like? Search no more. This is the man that runs Perverted-Justice.com .
www.youtube.com/watch...

Judged:

8

8

8

Pig Roast wrote:

We are talking about Pigs @ Work.
Female Deputy Sues for $50M After Topless Photos Used in Sting Op Against Pedophiles Allegedly Get Passed Around the Office
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/female-deputy...

Judged:

9

9

9

Miggy wrote:

Penman,
Thanks!
I only read the unabridged version, so I don't know specific differences. I know that some scenes cut out for the original publication where put back in, such as the run-in with "The Kid". Frankly, I can see why that part was cut. It was kind of unnecessary.

Judged:

9

9

9

penman1 wrote:

<quoted text>
It's been a madhouse around here this summer but I have figured out how to download your book onto my Nook (one reason I got it over a Kindle is a Nook supports more file formats). It'll be *much* easier for me to read it there than to try to get computer time. Looks interesting already, since it is what I thik is called "historical fiction"--real-life events as a backdrop for a story. I've liked that type of fiction since I was first exposed to it years ago. And with vacation coming up soon I'll get even more time.