Dear Friend and Neighbor,
"Who are we redeveloping it for and where are the people that project draws going to live? I'd really like to know..." you said.
If that would be so easy.
Expansion, redevelopment is not always really progress. A wild growth they also call cancer.
So, "over one half a BILLION dollars has been appropriated for redeveloping the waterfront. Who are we redeveloping it for..."?
As you see, so may unanswered questions, but things have already been set in motion.
"If John McCowan sold it because he was losing money, what should he have done?" If he was losing money? Wasn't he getting tired too?
If it was part of the community, the one we cherished, and needed to be protected. But when, and where do people get together, to discuss these things in time? How many efforts did we make, to "communicate"?
And when we talk about a half-a-billion, WHOSE money is it? And "redevelopment" is in itself an ugly word. Like censorship. The one we despise, we say. But we say many things. But do we mean them? Yes, who is supposed to be the beneficiary of all that "redevelopment"? But then again, do our people care?
We won't solve the problem, nor answer all these questions in five minutes, but to talk about it, and give it some thought, is a good start already.
I just have to ask you Hawk.What should have been done? If John McCowan sold it because he was losing money,what should he have done? You keep bemoaning the loss of our roots,our history our town. What do you suggest "the community" do to stem the tide of progress and expansion.Population is growing,words out about San Pedro,over one half a BILLION dollars has been appropriated for redeveloping the waterfront.Who are we redeveloping it for and where are the people that project draws going to live?
I'd really like to know what you think should be done?