Karma wrote:
So calling the man dumb, desecrating the dead is part of your so called good somaritan like conduct? Also insulting a religion, which I am Christian, however nonetheless is a slur part of your humanitarian behavior?? WOW...I have a hard time believing you were an officer of the law, and if you were I am SURE you were corrupt. All your prejudices would have hindered your decisions. A simple question why did you throw that was asked. Most people would have done that. Hindsight is 20/20 and I can't believe that the majority of people would have dialed 911 before holding the cupable for their actions JUST by asking why. Mr. Higgins', I'm sure, did not know they were drunk. BTW they passed the breathalizer rendering them able to drive. It was stated earlier. You are one he** of a detective since you listen to all the facts.
<quoted text>
How is it that you're a christian and commenting for karma?
Are you nuts?
OK, lets look at your goofy logic...
1.) you are sure that I was corrupt
Based on what? My citing the law?
2.)All my prejudices shaped my
opinion?
I have certifications as a LEO,
as a DJ, and as a Lethal Weapons
Agent in the state of Pa.
I didn't offer my opinions,
I explained the laws.
But since you don't know anything
about it, you have only your
unlearned, uninformed opinion to
hang on to.
3.)When there's four rowdy men
throwing ice tea at your car and
acting up, a sober man would stop
and consider what he's getting
into by himself, not just jump
into a fight.
He would also call the cops and
wait for them, then have the
upper hand to see that he was
compensated for his trouble.
It happens everyday, everywhere.
Just like that, no people die and
the victims aren't arested with
the bad guys. Logically.
4.)"Mr. Higgins, I'm sure, did not
know they were drunk".
Really? How would you know for a
fact if they were hauled in for
underage drinking and furnishing
alcohol to minors and corruption
of minors for supplying a bottle
of tequila .
5.)"BTW they passed the breathalizer
rendering them able to drive".
This article is the only one
that I read so if you read
something somewhere else, it
doesn't matter to me. The fact
remains that these 4 perps were
drinking at the time, and 2
illegally as minors.
If, after some time later,
they passed a breathalyzer and
could drive, its not relevent to
their conduct at the time of the
incident when they were more
under the influence. If you knew
when they were tested, and how,
it might make a difference, but
since they weren't driving at
the time, its a non-point.
6.) Since the article says,
"Police say the older Higgins had
gotten out of his car and accused
Roscioli, Harrison and two 15-
year-olds of throwing a carton of
iced tea on his car near a
pizzeria. Some witnesses said
Higgins, an ex-Marine who saw
combat duty in Vietnam, threw the
first punches, and was knocked to
the ground twice -- once by
Roscioli and once by Harrison --
before a customer at the pizzeria
told Roscioli and the teens to
leave", I'd say hindsight isn't
necessary in saying that Higgins
was a hothead who took matters
into his own hands and it
escalated when his son showed up.
He fell, landed wrong, and died.
It is terrible thing to have happen, but it was almost all Higgins' fault for not using good judgement with obvious bad guys.
The law was on Higgins' side, but he disobeyed it and got the worst of it.
Find something wrong with this, it is the way the law is written and enforced.