Housing Development Bars Gay Couples

Moron Bigot Homophobe wrote:

<quoted text>Although this did not answer the question you attempted to answer with it, you've overlooked something from your very own pro-gay link that I posted earlier.
Homosexuality is against the law. There are no if, ands or buts about it. If that ticks you off, oh well. Deal with it, it is what it is.
www.aclj.org

"Sodomy Laws in the United States
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that sodomy laws are unconstitutional on June 26, 2003.

The majority opinion is based on privacy rights and is written by Kennedy, joined by Breyer, Souter, Ginsburg, and Stephens. O'Connor concurred on equal protection grounds."

AGAIN- the above is from the website YOU provided.

You really are a certifiable nut. You have SO many more issues of a personal nature that seriously need your attention so much more than your fretting and hand wringing over the gay community.

You exemplify someone whose priorities are screwed up beyond belief. Just another symptom of your delusional paranoia and psychological hysteria.

ltndncr59 wrote:

<quoted text>
No, I didn't 'admit' that it started in the gay community. And actually, the first documented case of HIV was in the 50's and it was a heterosexual man.
The rest of your post is equally as baseless.

The first documented case of AIDS goes much further back than the 50s, although it can't be proven.

It can be proven, however, that the first case of AIDS from the epidemic that we are currently experiencing came directly from the gay community in California. It then began its spread across the United States.

I find it interesting how you and the rest of gay America compares AIDS to other STDs, and say "No one knew to use condoms or it wouldn't have spread". It not only would have spread anyway, but it is undeniable that it is the most deadly, excruciating disease known to man next to smallpox and the ebola virus.

We can thank the gay community for this. It is fact.

www.aclj.org

Melanie wrote:

In college, our professor showed us stats for Minnesota. According to what he had, your chances of getting AIDS was around 0% if you weren't gay and abstained from sex until marriage. The other numbers, although they escape me right now, were quite high. The point...the gay thing is dangerous to your health.

And those infected donate blood and the disease spreads even faster.

And homosexuals and activists close their blind eyes for the simple fact of sexual deviancy. Selfishness. Who cares about who suffers so painfully. Who cares who is left to mourn these innocent children who die daily from AIDS. We're just going to keep on living the way were living and deny all that we've done to America.

Selfishly sad that America has come to this.

www.aclj.org

Orange County blues wrote:

<quoted text>
"Sodomy Laws in the United States
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that sodomy laws are unconstitutional on June 26, 2003.
The majority opinion is based on privacy rights and is written by Kennedy, joined by Breyer, Souter, Ginsburg, and Stephens. O'Connor concurred on equal protection grounds."
AGAIN- the above is from the website YOU provided.
You really are a certifiable nut. You have SO many more issues of a personal nature that seriously need your attention so much more than your fretting and hand wringing over the gay community.
You exemplify someone whose priorities are screwed up beyond belief. Just another symptom of your delusional paranoia and psychological hysteria.

You left out the rest of what was on the link. Again, willful ignorance - intellectual dishonesty.

www.aclj.org

Disgusted American wrote:

<quoted text>Don't worry poor Dana...you won't have hourds of gays moving to the backwards bumpkin region of arkansas...you can keep your bigoted state..and continue Devolving.

Man you are Dumb Alaska (AK) is no where near Arkansas (AR)

Better get that penis out of your throat, you are choking yourself, and not getting enough oxygen to your brain.

Melanie wrote:

In college, our professor showed us stats for Minnesota. According to what he had, your chances of getting AIDS was around 0% if you weren't gay and abstained from sex until marriage. The other numbers, although they escape me right now, were quite high. The point...the gay thing is dangerous to your health.

Only if you are promiscuous and do not practice safe sex. This is exactly the same for heterosexual people.

There always has been & there always will be gay people. However the fact that it is so openly celebrated & even encouraged means more people, who would have never taken the step to being gay do to public criticism, will. It's a SIN! That natural shame that I'm sure you once experienced & most gay people started off with can & is seared by excuses for you actions & social justification. Being gay is not a good thing, never has been, never will be.

UnbelievableFL wrote:

<quoted text>
Seems you are confused about the form of government here in the U.S. The U.S. is not a true democracy. It is a constitutional republic.
What's the difference? In a democracy, majority rules..

You are a leftist, leftists oppose our Constitutional republic, that is why those on the left use the courts to legislate from the bench. Funny how the left now wants to hang their hat on the Constitutional republic form of government that they have rejected since FDR. Face it you guys on the left are subverting the rights and freedoms of everyone else to push your agenda, and it is time to bring on the war to stop the left from turning America into a socialist wasteland.

Cpetr13 wrote:

But YOUR group wants to restrict OUR group's rights, so where is the problem here? Can't take what you dish out?
<quoted text>

As usual or little boy molester here is wrong again.

Cpetr13 wrote:

Gay parents qre one of the least-likely people to molest kids
<quoted text>

Hogwash.

Wally wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, they were gay because it was a male molesting a boy. Isn't that being gay?

Dasein9 wrote:

<quoted text>
No, it's not.

It sure is.

Moron Bigot Homophobe wrote:

<quoted text>It is illegal. If you go back into the closet, not a whole lot of people would worry or complain about it. Thank you, that would be a huge relief off of our shoulders. Now our country will have some time to heal and get back the wholesome and Godfearing-loving status that we used to revel in. It's what separated us from the rest of the world.
Thank you from the bottom of America's heart for going back into the closet.
It would be even better if you were to renounce your wicked ways and come to the Lord. He'd be so happy about that.
www.aclj.org

My last reply to you. You have named yourself aptly. You are a moron.

dana wrote:

<quoted text>
Hogwash.

Actually, statistically, that is quite true. Gay parents are MUCH less likely to physically or sexually abuse their children than straight parents.

ltndncr59 wrote:

<quoted text>
Gay parents are MUCH less likely to physically or sexually abuse their children than straight parents.

Again hogwash. Gays cannot have children, it is an impossible act for two gay people to have children.
According to Darwin, your homosexual choices are bound to wipe you out, as you cannot propagate the species, hence mother nature will eventually take care of your problem (mother nature gave us Aids). The reason why the Boy Scouts fought, and still fight to keep gays away from the boys, is to protect the boys from gay people, who want to prey on the young boys.

keep those gays out

angel wrote:

keep those gays out

why?

dana wrote:

<quoted text>
Again hogwash. Gays cannot have children, it is an impossible act for two gay people to have children.
According to Darwin, your homosexual choices are bound to wipe you out, as you cannot propagate the species, hence mother nature will eventually take care of your problem (mother nature gave us Aids). The reason why the Boy Scouts fought, and still fight to keep gays away from the boys, is to protect the boys from gay people, who want to prey on the young boys.

Does IVF and Surrogate Mother mean anything to you. Just like straight couple who have difficulty conceiving also use that.

ltndncr59 wrote:

<quoted text>
My last reply to you. You have named yourself aptly. You are a moron.

Actually, it was you and your ilk that gave me this name. I was merely being nice and obliging you.

Now you can be nice and go ahead and go back into the closet or change the choice you made. The latter is preferable-- and doable.

Can gays go straight?
Yup -- they do all the time: http://www.leaderu.com/focus/exgays01.html
http://www.stonewallrevisited.com/pages/chuck...
http://www.stonewallrevisited.com/menus/pages...

And so many and much more!

www.aclj.org

dana wrote:

Again hogwash. Gays cannot have children, it is an impossible act for two gay people to have children.

I wasn't aware that homosexual was a synonym for sterile. You learn something new every day.

dana wrote:

According to Darwin, your homosexual choices are bound to wipe you out, as you cannot propagate the species, hence mother nature will eventually take care of your problem (mother nature gave us Aids).

Again, who knew homosexual automatically meant sterile. I happen to know several gay individuals whom have several children, so I'm fairly certain that your statement is not only patently false, it's just plain stupid. Also, mother nature might have given us HIV/AIDs, but she also gave us Breast Cancer, Cervical Cancer, Uterine Cancer, Testicular Cancer, Prostate Cancer, Lung Cancer, Melanoma, Lymphatic Cancer, Stomach Cancer, Aortic Embolisms, etc...

dana wrote:

The reason why the Boy Scouts fought, and still fight to keep gays away from the boys, is to protect the boys from gay people, who want to prey on the young boys.

Yes. The perceived notion that no boy scouts will ever be assaulted by a man simply because there are no homosexual men allowed is asinine, especially since the majority of men who sexually assault boys are NOT homosexual.

dana wrote:

<quoted text>
Again hogwash. Gays cannot have children, it is an impossible act for two gay people to have children.
According to Darwin, your homosexual choices are bound to wipe you out, as you cannot propagate the species, hence mother nature will eventually take care of your problem (mother nature gave us Aids). The reason why the Boy Scouts fought, and still fight to keep gays away from the boys, is to protect the boys from gay people, who want to prey on the young boys.

You have obviously missed the point that homosexuals are born to heterosexual parents. And it keeps happening, just as it has throughout history, and across societal lines.

I don't know a single homosexual man who is interested in boys. Why are you fixated on that? Are you a closet pedophile?