|
Level 9
Since: Jun 11
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
harvey wrote: <quoted text>
Bad stuff has happened in courts a few times...and that Goetz guy gut raked over the coals 30 years ago...and people like me are fed up...so that means Zimmerman's OK to shoot a kid on suspicion.
Do you know how flaky that sounds, how flimsy and worthless?
Then let me tell you. No, it's not OK. But it's also not OK to ignore black-on black crime the way leaders in that community do. We're sitting here discussing an act of violence, but for rational minds, it seems the only time black people become outraged at a death of one of their own is when someone not of their race does it. Where's the outrage when some thug shoots up a party? Or when a convenience store manager gets pummeled while trying to stop a flash rob? You're fed up? Check this article: http://articles.baltimoresun.com/2012-05-17/n... I know you'll come back here and scream racism on the part of the guy in the article, and that's the problem. It's not about the messenger- it's about the message.
|
|
“KONA, baby!”
Level 1
Since: Jul 08
Jacksonville, FL
|
Please wait...
harvey wrote: <quoted text>
Bad stuff has happened in courts a few times...and that Goetz guy gut raked over the coals 30 years ago...and people like me are fed up...so that means Zimmerman's OK to shoot a kid on suspicion.
Do you know how flaky that sounds, how flimsy and worthless?
Then let me tell you. Martin wasn't shot on suspicion, he was shot in self defense. Do try to keep up.
|
|
harvey
Reynoldsburg, OH
|
Charles R Darwin wrote: <quoted text> No, it's not OK. But it's also not OK to ignore black-on black crime the way leaders in that community do. We're sitting here discussing an act of violence, but for rational minds, it seems the only time black people become outraged at a death of one of their own is when someone not of their race does it. Where's the outrage when some thug shoots up a party? Or when a convenience store manager gets pummeled while trying to stop a flash rob? You're fed up? Check this article: http://articles.baltimoresun.com/2012-05-17/n... I know you'll come back here and scream racism on the part of the guy in the article, and that's the problem. It's not about the messenger- it's about the message. How does the death of an innocent black kid suddenly become a discussion of black-on-black crime? You're off-message, message man...
|
|
harvey
Reynoldsburg, OH
|
PappaSmurf wrote: <quoted text>
Martin wasn't shot on suspicion, he was shot in self defense. Do try to keep up. Liar. He acted against a dangerous, armed stalker in self-defense, and the stalker MURDERED him with a handgun. He's in jail, and will do further time. Deal with that.
|
|
“Shoot for the stars”
Level 5
Since: Dec 10
Planet Earth
|
Please wait...
harvey wrote: <quoted text>
Liar. He acted against a dangerous, armed stalker in self-defense, and the stalker MURDERED him with a handgun.
He's in jail, and will do further time. Deal with that. Agreed! The Zimmerman pit bulls belong in jail and we don't need them procreating either.
|
|
Level 5
Since: Feb 11
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
Charles R Darwin wrote: <quoted text>
And thieves in this area of the country (don't know about other areas) have filed civil suits- and won- for injuries suffered while breaking into people's homes. WAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH! He had a trial in front of a jury and he not only lost, he lost big time. He lost big time because Americans don't like cowards - like yourself- who decide they can shoot people in the back who are no threat to them just because they have a gun instead of a spine.
|
|
Tell me when this thread is updated:
(Registration is not required)
Add to my Tracker
Send me an email
|
Aquarius