|
Hey Marce
Chula Vista, CA
|
reviewingcrime wrote: <quoted text>You would not believe me if I told you, but will say that her daughter knew everyting about her mother. Casey used to talk to Caylee as if she were her best friend. Can we assume then that you know Casey? Even if Casey did speak to her daughter as if they were best pals, a child who is not even three has an extremely limited grasp of life. No matter how bright the child is.
|
|
Yoy
Brisbane, Australia
|
reviewingcrime wrote: <quoted text>You would not believe me if I told you, but will say that her daughter knew everyting about her mother. Casey used to talk to Caylee as if she were her best friend. Huh! There are a lot of Mother's who do this and while I don't agree with it Caylee was a very young child who did not have the life skills or vocabulary to understand exactly what her Mother was up to. No way. The danger lied in the fact that Caylee might unwittingly dob her mom in. "Nanny who? Mummy took me shopping today!" "Weren't you supposed to be at work Casey?" Get it?
|
|
Yoy
Brisbane, Australia
|
JamieG wrote: <quoted text> Maybe he has back trouble. Rofl! I can't wait till they pin DC to the seat and grill him properly.
|
|
Hey Marce
Chula Vista, CA
|
Judged:
1
Yoy wrote: <quoted text> Lol, it is all made up conjecture Marce. For starters, Cindy never worked for the nursing home where her Dad was and it was quite a trip to get there. She did sign in and I imagine that many others ould have also signed in to see their Dad on Father's Day so it would be easy to prove the sign in date was correct as it would be sandwiched between others visiting on the same day. There is no record of Casey having gone for skin treatment at all and the lack of logic that someone who murdered one woman would simply let a witness go and take their child to shut them up is ludicrous. Not to mention that a mother would let their child stay in the company of a murderer for so long and imagine that the child was alive and wold be returned lol. Not thought through at all imo. Shhh...I know. Bear with me, please.
|
|
reviewingcrime
AOL
|
Hey Marce wrote: <quoted text> Can we assume then that you know Casey? Even if Casey did speak to her daughter as if they were best pals, a child who is not even three has an extremely limited grasp of life. No matter how bright the child is. No
|
|
Tommycat
|
toetag wrote: ngrace wrote: <quoted text> Jenni, I'll say it again...IF she is innocent, the reason she wasn't talking was because she had something she considered to be far worse....that's why whatever she was mixed up in (if she was mixed up in something), she would not want her family to know about. Personally, even if it was something not so bad, in her perception (like a kid) she didn't want to "fess up" to. Her infamous "strut" when she was first arrainged last July, is not that of someone who is guilty of harming her daughter...but that's just the way I saw it. .......... No, her strut wasn't that of someone guilty of harming her daughter. None of her actions during the 30 days from 16 June to 16 July were the actions one would expect from a mother who had harmed her daughter. Casey doesn't fit the profile of a "normal" mother IMO. However, she showed normal behavior for a mother who had harmed her daughter when she lied to LE and refused to give them any helpful info. That is very typical of criminals. From what I have seen the state still has a big job ahead with the evidence. However, Casey's 30 days of partying, her failure to report her daughter missing, her lying to investigators, etc will go a long way toward guaranteeing a conviction for the state. In exceptionally heinous cases (which this is), many jurors are ruled by emotion. However, if Baez cannot successfully refute the state's circumstantial evidence she will be convicted even if the jury is not ruled by emotion. I didn't mention the physical and forensic evidence because I do not think we really know at this time what the state has. No parent on the jury will be able to understand her not reporting her daughter missing. LE and the FBI can be involved silently behind the scenes in a kidnapping. I can't think of anything that would be worse than having a child missing and possible dead. This strikes horror in the hearts of parents worldwide. I just don't think there is a logical explanation for the happenings in this case. The whole thing defies logic. In all likelihood, Casey herself will be the golden nugget that will garner the state a conviction. All of the above, JMO. Thank you ,thank you! ITA She talked when she should have kept her mouth shut,she was not charged and didn't have to answer any questions unless she was being charged and then she could have asked for a lawyer. She didn't ask she had some very strange notion that LE would believe her story.It is amazing to me why she told such stupid lies,and no matter what LE said she didn't back down. The next day she takes them to Universal and continues with the lies until they reach that hallway and she admits she has no office there,but continues with more lies.I've read that when people lie there is usually a grain of truth in the lie,that isn't true with most of KC's lies. Maybe it's because in the past her lies were just ignored or accepted. JMHO of course
|
|
reviewingcrime
AOL
|
Maura wrote: <quoted text> Nicole Ganguzza went jogging in Blanchard Park after 5:45pm on the evening of Tuesday, June 10 and her body was found the next day. Around noon on June 10, Casey and Caylee picked Tony up at Full Sail and drove Tony to the mechanic to pick up his Jeep. They went to Subway where Casey bought sandwiches for the three of them, and then they drove back to Tony's to eat their sandwiches and hang out for the afternoon. Casey and Caylee left Tony’s around 4:00pm and headed home, returning at 4:29pm. From 4:30pm until 4:39am, Casey used her phone heavily to make 180 calls and texts, each one pinging a tower close to the Anthony home. Casey was NOWHERE near Blanchard Park when Nicole Ganguzza was raped and killed. Just mapped the drive to Blanchard Park from Hopesprings Dr and it is 9 miles and 19 mins. How many ping towers are between Hopesprings and Blanchard Park? It still bothers me that she stated she was told to meet someone at this park around this time frame. 180 messages that evening was alot and something must have been going on. Did they have record of text messages and what they said? Sorry to go on about this, but it just bothered me.
|
Joined: Jun 27, 2009
Comments: 3349
Jacksonville, FL
|
whataboutcaylee wrote: <quoted text> I really learn a lot from your posts when you are not busy soothing ngrace.(BTW, do you have a masters in...sarcasm?) LOL. Ph D.
|
|
Joined: Jun 27, 2009
Comments: 3349
Jacksonville, FL
|
reviewingcrime wrote: <quoted text>You would not believe me if I told you, but will say that her daughter knew everyting about her mother. Casey used to talk to Caylee as if she were her best friend. A two year old? Please!!! No matter what Casey said to her , she was much too young to grasp the true meaning of most of it. Now, about that skin treatment??? Wonder if they make jail calls, Casey really needs skin treatment now.
|
|
reviewingcrime
AOL
|
Yoy wrote: <quoted text> Huh! There are a lot of Mother's who do this and while I don't agree with it Caylee was a very young child who did not have the life skills or vocabulary to understand exactly what her Mother was up to. No way. The danger lied in the fact that Caylee might unwittingly dob her mom in. "Nanny who? Mummy took me shopping today!" "Weren't you supposed to be at work Casey?" Get it? Caylee was almost three years old before she went missing. When my daughter was two, she understood everything I said and before she was three, she was ice skating and racing on ice with kids five years older than she was...she was very smart and had a large vocabulary for her age. Only children with a single Mom and no other children around on a full time basis often mature faster with a higher degree of comprehension than does a child who does not spend most of their time with adults. It seems to depend on the child. Caylee could repeat everything she heard and saw from what I understand.
|
|
reviewingcrime
AOL
|
toetag wrote: <quoted text> A two year old? Please!!! No matter what Casey said to her , she was much too young to grasp the true meaning of most of it. Now, about that skin treatment??? Wonder if they make jail calls, Casey really needs skin treatment now. Casey was having skin problems before she went to jail. It was said that she was very unhappy with what they did to her skin when she went to have skin treatment. It was also said that she cried for more than a week when Jesus died and that he was a very very very special person that Casey had one day wanted her to meet. She was smart folks. Nite
|
Joined: Jun 27, 2009
Comments: 3349
Jacksonville, FL
|
reviewingcrime wrote: <quoted text>Casey was having skin problems before she went to jail. It was said that she was very unhappy with what they did to her skin when she went to have skin treatment. It was also said that she cried for more than a week when Jesus died and that he was a very very very special person that Casey had one day wanted her to meet. She was smart folks. Nite A lot of things have been said. However, without knowing who said them, when they were said and in what context it is impossible to evaluate their truthfulness or importance. JMO. Good night to you, sleep well.
|
|
reviewingcrime
AOL
|
toetag wrote: <quoted text> A lot of things have been said. However, without knowing who said them, when they were said and in what context it is impossible to evaluate their truthfulness or importance. JMO. Good night to you, sleep well. Any way we can get Casey to tell her the truth about having skin treatment and if she got really mad about the results? This would help in know where the information came from.
|
|
reviewingcrime
AOL
|
Sorry for the sloppy typing above. (tell the truth) (in knowing where)
|
Joined: Sep 10, 2008
Comments: 6598
Coldwater, MI
|
Nobama wrote: <quoted text>I have just a few questions for you. Why do you even bother to respond to this person? Do you simply enjoy a worthless argument? When did you become so bitter and mean? Your last sentence is very telling of the type of person that you appear to be. What a sad life you must live. I will say a prayer for you this evening that life turns around for you. And you are who?? And you care why?? That's what I thought..........
|
|
MyHumbleOpinion
|
ngrace wrote: <quoted text> T-CAT, Please read the original comment again.....it explains "why" this story (or any other) does NOT have to even be addressed in Court. Court is where this case will be tried...not on these blogs. Here's the original comment: ******** ngrace wrote: "Again, all that has to be proven in Court is that the evidence of the death of Caylee can be directly connected to Casey Anthony. Even a circumstantial case, has to be connected to the accused. Let's wait and see if the State can or can not do this...remember, the Defense does not have to put on a case...all they have to do is poke holes in the State's case to create reasonable doubt. The Jury will be charged with finding her guitly beyond a reasonable doubt." You just keep talking about reasonable doubt. There might be reasonable doubt is there were an real flesh and blood Zanny the nanny who had ever taken care of Caylee and who lived at any of the places Casey gave as her addresses. However, when the whole world has been looking for Zanny the nanny and no one, absolutely no one had ever seen her but the defendent, any reasonable person should conclude there is no Zanny the nanny. CASEY'S UNCONFIRMED WORDS ALONE ARE NOT REASONABLE DOUBT. IF ALL ANY DEFENDENT HAD TO DO WAS SAY "I DIDN'T DO IT, SOMEBODY ELSE DID", NO ONE WOULD BE IN PRISON. Remember I work for LE and I know how we go about locating people. You would be amazed at the databases we have at the state police level. I can only imagine how much more the FBI have at their disposal. I can run someone's vehicle registration plate and from there get their name, their date of birth and social, then from there find out if they have a driver's license in any other state and run a complete criminal history through an FBI database and know within the a few seconds any crime they have ever been charged with and the disposition.(and their previous addresses) (I DON'T WANT TO SCARE ANYONE OUT THERE, SO PLEASE KNOW WE ARE HELD TO VERY HIGH STANDARDS AND COULD BE CRIMINALLY CHARGED FOR MISUSING ANY OF THESE DATABASES. WE CAN ONLY RUN CRIMINAL HISTORIES UNDER CERTAIN CONDITIONS AND THERE ARE A LOT OF RULES WE HAVE TO FOLLOW AND EVERY AGENCY IS AUDITED BY THE FBI TO MAKE SURE THEY ARE COMPLYING) This is the computer age and LE have all the good databases. Wait until LE tells the court how they searched for Zenaida Fernandez Gonzalas. Jeffrey Michael Hopkins, Juliet Lewis, and all the other imaginary fnds and did not find them.
|
|
MyHumbleOpinion
|
Judged:
1
"friends" sorry about the typo
|
|
Who Are You
|
Chloroform Girl wrote: <quoted text>No, I don't have daily discussions with Yuri. They found letters to a pink shirt at the crime scene that I could have sworn I saw a photo of Caylee in online. They hadn't identified the remains yet. I thought that might be important to possibly identifying a murdered child. I could not have slept well knowing I had seen a photo of Caylee in a similar shirt and not let someone know about it. If you have a problem with that than too bad. It was the right thing to do. I wasn't throwing anyone under the bus or lying or sleuthing or trying to frame anyone in doing so. Interesting. I didn't think they released info about the letters until AFTER the remains were "IDENTIFIED!"
|
|
Yoy
Brisbane, Australia
|
Judged:
1
1
reviewingcrime wrote: <quoted text>Caylee was almost three years old before she went missing. When my daughter was two, she understood everything I said and before she was three, she was ice skating and racing on ice with kids five years older than she was...she was very smart and had a large vocabulary for her age. Only children with a single Mom and no other children around on a full time basis often mature faster with a higher degree of comprehension than does a child who does not spend most of their time with adults. It seems to depend on the child. Caylee could repeat everything she heard and saw from what I understand. George (back when he was telling the truth) gave a very clear idea of Caylee's vocabulary to the police interviewing him and while good for a 3 yr old it was nothing amazing. He also said she never seemed to recognise the name Zanny. My son has always had an above level vocab and yet there is no way at 3 he understood everything that I did. If I wanted to hide something from him or not tell him the exact truth a bout something then he would believe whatever I said. But at that age they can inadvertently begin to say things you wish they wouldn't have for sure! Not the same thing though is it.
|
|
Danna
Austin, TX
|
Judged:
1
I agree Yoy. I have a 3yr old granddaughter, and while she is smart as a whip, there are things she just doesnt know about or comprehend just yet. They are fabulous at repeating things at that age...esp the things you dont want them to repeat...like when you say oh, _hit or something of that nature. lol
|
|
|