Raye Dawn Smith's Pre-sentencing Report

KelseysVoice wrote:

<quoted text>Refreshing, isn't it?

KelseysVoice wrote:

I just read the FKM explanation for the presentencing report. The interviewer yelled at Raye, and that's why it came out against her. Good Lord, people. She was twenty-six years old, not five.

ProtectTheLilOnes wrote:

<quoted text>
If this statement is true, it's obvious that the interviewer was frustrated at her inability to accept responsibility for her actions/inactions.
This showed in her OSBI interviews as well.

yaMeVoy wrote:

<quoted text>
The fact that the interviewer was out of control shows her bias, from the lies she was told by her mother in law and abusive ex husband,This interviewer could not even pass as a juror, with her already guilty verdict before the trial. Could you go put an Ex-husband down as a reference in a job application?

ProtectTheLilOnes wrote:

<quoted text>
If this statement is true, it's obvious that the interviewer was frustrated at her inability to accept responsibility for her actions/inactions.
This showed in her OSBI interviews as well.

yaMeVoy wrote:

<quoted text>
The fact that the interviewer was out of control shows her bias, from the lies she was told by her mother in law and abusive ex husband,This interviewer could not even pass as a juror, with her already guilty verdict before the trial. Could you go put an Ex-husband down as a reference in a job application?

4 The Children wrote:

<quoted text>
This person had no contact with either side of the family. They weren't biased. It's obvious they were just conducting an analysis of Raye Dawn's behaviors.

KelseysVoice wrote:

<quoted text>Please consider how ridiculous you sound, not to mention the fact that you just confirmed what I posted. The officer who interviewed Raye didn't raise their voice. Even if she or he had, Raye was twenty-six years old. She was capable of defending herself.

KelseysVoice wrote:

I want to address the issue of Kelsey's skull fracture. It might not have been visible to the naked eye at first, because she had thick hair. However, Kelsey would have screamed in pain whenever Raye tried to brush her hair. There is no way on earth that she could have missed it.

yaMeVoy wrote:

<quoted text>when did she get a skull fracture? maybe she just refused to let her hair be brushed.
lots of children refused to get their hair brushed, so you do not have the evidence you want to have.

Judged:

1

yaMeVoy wrote:

<quoted text>
she was a traumatized 26 year old,
who lost her her husband,
her grandma,
her father,
her child,
her child again,
and her husband again,
all in a matter of two years...
prejudiced jury
prejudiced probation report.
what more could angry in-laws happier?

ProtectTheLilOnes wrote:

<quoted text>
It sure is. Maybe now we will hear the truth and things that weren't previously released.

Judged:

1

1

yaMeVoy wrote:

<quoted text>when did she get a skull fracture? maybe she just refused to let her hair be brushed.
lots of children refused to get their hair brushed, so you do not have the evidence you want to have.

NoUse wrote:

This ridiculous statement of yours PROVES beyond a REASONABLE DOUBT that you DO NOT and HAVE NOT read the documents for yourself!!! You spout lies and other peoples words here and pass them for yours. The SECOND AUTOPSY shows the OTHER SKULL FRACTURE that was IN A DIFFERENT STAGE OF HEALING than the injuries to Kelsey on the day she was MURDERED!! good grief, woman, think and read for yourself!!!! You look ridiculous when you post this crap and no one takes anything you say serious. How can you have an "opinion" without reading the facts???? ALL OF THEM???? Question of the DAY!!!
<quoted text>

yaMeVoy wrote:

<quoted text>
could that be when whitney saw mike bang kelsey's head against the brick wall?
or are you calling whitney a liar.