Wrongful Convictions -- Stealing Lives One Person at a Time

whokilledkelsey.com

yaMeVoy wrote:

<quoted text>
She did not dump the baby off on her family,
It is very noble of Raye Dawn to be home with her family, please don't try to make it a fault,
single girls need to go for help and
should not be shamed for asking for it.
or is this just one of my many lies?
or ?your imagination is evidence she abused her baby ?or shamelessly allowed mike to abuse her?,
although he did not know she was allowing it otherwise we would have his daughter Whitney saying mike was spankings her real hard until she puke while raye was there. Get real. quit the unfair trial
www.TheTruthAboutKelsy.com

Sue, I wasn't necessarily speaking about Raye Dawn did this. I just made a general statement about what I've observed about a lot of single mothers today.
Many of them take parenting too lightly and not serious enough.
I think careful consideration needs to be taken BEFORE these young mothers make the decision to keep their babies.
They really do not know what the full responsbility entails.
If the parenting role were taken seriously enough, we wouldn't have the neglect and abuse that is going on today at these levels.
Social workers today are overwhelmed at their caseloads.
I realize single girls DO need to go for help and maybe placing their babies up for adoption would be a better choice for these girls that are NOT ready to take on this kind of responsibility. A lot of these single mothers are VERY young to begin with. Of course, if they practiced SAFE sex or abstinence to begin with, this would never happen. I think the girls today need to take a good look at their impulsive lifestyles.

ProtectTheLilOnes wrote:

<quoted text>
Sue, I wasn't necessarily speaking about Raye Dawn did this. I just made a general statement about what I've observed about a lot of single mothers today.
Many of them take parenting too lightly and not serious enough.
I think careful consideration needs to be taken BEFORE these young mothers make the decision to keep their babies.
They really do not know what the full responsbility entails.
If the parenting role were taken seriously enough, we wouldn't have the neglect and abuse that is going on today at these levels.
Social workers today are overwhelmed at their caseloads.
I realize single girls DO need to go for help and maybe placing their babies up for adoption would be a better choice for these girls that are NOT ready to take on this kind of responsibility. A lot of these single mothers are VERY young to begin with. Of course, if they practiced SAFE sex or abstinence to begin with, this would never happen. I think the girls today need to take a good look at their impulsive lifestyles.

I am so glad that my parents kept me,

even though I had it rough, I also had it good,

and yes, people do

not know how hard it is to take care of a baby,

and what makes it harder is that with 3,000 abortions every day children are not around babies and toddlers like they used to be in my grandmother's time,

they don't have little brothers and sisters, nieces and nephews to learn from,

I don't know why they don't include this child care Observation in first grade,
'to see how to handle correctly a toddler throwing a fit.

what do you do when a toddler bites you.

These are things that can catch a person by surprise.

With all the violence we entertain ourselves in the evening who has time to talk this out proper with a toddler,

top that off with the fact that the law reads that it is ok to kill a baby before it is born for little or no reasons,

Selfish reasons for sure.

this promotes selfishness.

this does not imply the best interests of the child.

The girls are pushed into sex at an early age and into pregnancy which the girls gets in trouble for so that she tries to hide this problem,

this labels the baby as the problem.

What makes a girl a good girl,

if she is good at hiding a problem

or good at taking care of

what she has brought into the world.

a whore is a whore, sex unlicensed is the problem,

the baby is the result of opening up the baby-making equipment.

having a baby is a blessing

and a reward for all your hard work.

It would be better if everyone put a deposit in the bank and everyone got fixed than

to let mothers and our doctors and nurses kill the babies.

I truly believe this allowing of killing the babies before they are born is one of the main reasons we have an increase in child abuse
and the decline in decent doctors. and no amount of bullying is going to change my opinion on this.

yaMeVoy wrote:

<quoted text>
I am so glad that my parents kept me,
even though I had it rough, I also had it good,
and yes, people do
not know how hard it is to take care of a baby,
and what makes it harder is that with 3,000 abortions every day children are not around babies and toddlers like they used to be in my grandmother's time,
they don't have little brothers and sisters, nieces and nephews to learn from,
I don't know why they don't include this child care Observation in first grade,
'to see how to handle correctly a toddler throwing a fit.
what do you do when a toddler bites you.
These are things that can catch a person by surprise.
With all the violence we entertain ourselves in the evening who has time to talk this out proper with a toddler,
top that off with the fact that the law reads that it is ok to kill a baby before it is born for little or no reasons,
Selfish reasons for sure.
this promotes selfishness.
this does not imply the best interests of the child.
The girls are pushed into sex at an early age and into pregnancy which the girls gets in trouble for so that she tries to hide this problem,
this labels the baby as the problem.
What makes a girl a good girl,
if she is good at hiding a problem
or good at taking care of
what she has brought into the world.
a whore is a whore, sex unlicensed is the problem,
the baby is the result of opening up the baby-making equipment.
having a baby is a blessing
and a reward for all your hard work.
It would be better if everyone put a deposit in the bank and everyone got fixed than
to let mothers and our doctors and nurses kill the babies.
I truly believe this allowing of killing the babies before they are born is one of the main reasons we have an increase in child abuse
and the decline in decent doctors. and no amount of bullying is going to change my opinion on this.

Sue, I respect your opinion concerning abortion. That is your legal right. However, this has nothing to do with Kelsey. Please keep to the topic.

where did I say I was 53? where have I lied one time on this forum?

That mean! That mean!
you just proved you are lying about me. which is crazy, why would you want to do that?
which is off-topic
and has nothing to do with
www.TheTruthAboutKelsey,

Well if you look at Raye Dawn's own words, looks like she stayed in bed and slept ALOT!!! Can't imagine having a 2 yr old and sleeping in until 10 or noon every day. What did Kelsey do while mommy slept all the time? Seeing what she fixed that poor baby to eat for breakfast broke my heart. <shaking head here>

ProtectTheLilOnes wrote:

<quoted text>
Well said!
Also, Sue, maybe Porter took his son to work with him just like he dropped his daughter off to school daily and picked her up daily because maybe he observed Raye Dawn in action with Kelsey and didn't want his children to suffer the abuse as Kelsey did, don't you think?
I kept asking myself WHY didn't Raye Dawn take Whitney to and from school? After all she was a stay-at-home mom at this point, wasn't she?
The day she supposedly picked Whitney up from school (that fateful day) was something she NEVER did before.
Whoever heard of a working man doing all of this when he has a stay-at-home wife?
It also struck a little odd to me when it was mentioned that sometimes Porter also did household chores like laundry. Which leads me to wonder what exactly did Raye Dawn do and who was exactly in control of the relationship? Sounds like Porter may have had quite a honey-do list if you ask me.

yaMeVoy wrote:

where did I say I was 53? where have I lied one time on this forum?
That mean! That mean!
you just proved you are lying about me. which is crazy, why would you want to do that?
which is off-topic
and has nothing to do with
www.TheTruthAboutKelsey,

You repeatedly claimed to be fifty-three. And what about your post concerning Kevin Robinson? Was that the truth?

Sue lied about a dead man who cannot defend himself. Sue lied and said that Kelsey hated the Briggs family. I can go on for days, but she's not worth it.

wow, using little Kelsey's words....aren't you just the cute one?
Honey I have news for you...thetruthaboutkelsey site has NO truth about Kelsey on it that I have seen. MY opinion of course. The real name should be www.theliesaboutkelsey.com , that would be more fitting of the content. Again, my opinion!

yaMeVoy wrote:

where did I say I was 53? where have I lied one time on this forum?
That mean! That mean!
you just proved you are lying about me. which is crazy, why would you want to do that?
which is off-topic
and has nothing to do with
www.TheTruthAboutKelsey,

NoUse wrote:

wow, using little Kelsey's words....aren't you just the cute one?
Honey I have news for you...thetruthaboutkelsey site has NO truth about Kelsey on it that I have seen. MY opinion of course. The real name should be www.theliesaboutkelsey.com , that would be more fitting of the content. Again, my opinion!
<quoted text>

I can prove her birth date, Tulsa. Watch her shift the topic of discussion.

KelseysVoice wrote:

<quoted text>You repeatedly claimed to be fifty-three. And what about your post concerning Kevin Robinson? Was that the truth?

I also rembeber that Sue posted that she was 52, soit could not have been very long ago. She also posted on an chnge in OK abortion laws thread last week that she had a baby when she was 40 and she is 12 years old now- so that would also make her 52 or 53...

Anyway what is the deal with Sue focusing on such nonsense? Afraid we might end up "knowing to much"? She claimed to know all about me a few days ago but no other information has been forstcomming so far. Although since this is may name and I posted where a lived here it would not exactly take a rocket scientist to "find" me!
excuse the spelling, I am blogging with my thumbs on my ipod the keyboard is about 2 1/2" by 1"!

ELHalfpenny wrote:

<quoted text>
I also rembeber that Sue posted that she was 52, soit could not have been very long ago. She also posted on an chnge in OK abortion laws thread last week that she had a baby when she was 40 and she is 12 years old now- so that would also make her 52 or 53...
Anyway what is the deal with Sue focusing on such nonsense? Afraid we might end up "knowing to much"? She claimed to know all about me a few days ago but no other information has been forstcomming so far. Although since this is may name and I posted where a lived here it would not exactly take a rocket scientist to "find" me!
excuse the spelling, I am blogging with my thumbs on my ipod the keyboard is about 2 1/2" by 1"!

Perhaps she equates age with wisdom?

Sue,

Last lie: You claim you were raped four times and every rape resulted in a PREGNANCY.

Stats:

Excluding the sex trades, about 4 out of 1000 woman get raped while ovulating. 4/1000
Of these 1:3 or 1.3 out of 10,000 (.0025%) would likely become pregnant without medical interference (aka "morning after pill").

And this is slightly HIGHER that the actual number of woman that do become pregnant raped once. Mathamatically the risk LOWERS with multiple rapes.(excluding sex workers)

I origionally said that the chance of this was statistically impossible.

Since then I been working it out.. Looks like a woman would have a 23.3 times more risk of getting struck by lighting that getting pregnant by rape TWICE. To put this into prospective: the odds of winning a MILLION $ plus lottery are only sixteen times LESS likely that getting struck by lighting.

I posted at least four other lies I have cought you on and I have been here for like, 2 or 3 weeks! You lie all the time especially about you self and you life. Like it was not pathetic enough you have to dramatize it.

ELHalfpenny wrote:

Sue,
Last lie: You claim you were raped four times and every rape resulted in a PREGNANCY.
Stats:
Excluding the sex trades, about 4 out of 1000 woman get raped while ovulating. 4/1000
Of these 1:3 or 1.3 out of 10,000 (.0025%) would likely become pregnant without medical interference (aka "morning after pill").
And this is slightly HIGHER that the actual number of woman that do become pregnant raped once. Mathamatically the risk LOWERS with multiple rapes.(excluding sex workers)
I origionally said that the chance of this was statistically impossible.
Since then I been working it out.. Looks like a woman would have a 23.3 times more risk of getting struck by lighting that getting pregnant by rape TWICE. To put this into prospective: the odds of winning a MILLION $ plus lottery are only sixteen times LESS likely that getting struck by lighting.
I posted at least four other lies I have cought you on and I have been here for like, 2 or 3 weeks! You lie all the time especially about you self and you life. Like it was not pathetic enough you have to dramatize it.

El, Sue does have approximately eight kids. I verified this. You will avoid developing an ulcer if you ignore her constantly changing stories regarding her personal life. I know this by bitter experience. You really want to get really, really angry? Go back about forty or fifty pages for a posting that she made about the death of Kevin Robinson, Lance's biological father. She wrote that he had committed suicide because Kathie refused to let him see their children. A totally horrific lie. Kevin had liberal visitation rights. I checked this. He also suffered a great deal from depression. The day before he died, he was supposed to pick up the children, and never showed up. Kevin did take his own life, but it was caused by his own inner demons, not by Kathie. To me, that post Sue made was unforgivable.

KelseysVoice wrote:

<quoted text>El, Go back about forty or fifty pages for a posting that she made about the death of Kevin Robinson, Lance's biological father. She wrote that he had committed suicide because Kathie refused to let him see their children. A totally horrific lie. Kevin had liberal visitation rights. I checked this. He also suffered a great deal from depression. The day before he died, he was supposed to pick up the children, and never showed up. Kevin did take his own life, but it was caused by his own inner demons, not by Kathie. To me, that post Sue made was unforgivable.

I actually have read some about Kevin Robinson and I agree the post(s) were very sad and SICK. I know that trying to reason with mentally ill people is usless and will take your suggestion to ignore Sue under advisment!

ELHalfpenny wrote:

<quoted text>
I actually have read some about Kevin Robinson and I agree the post(s) were very sad and SICK. I know that trying to reason with mentally ill people is usless and will take your suggestion to ignore Sue under advisment!

Believe me, I no longer have stomach aches at night. It is totally worth it.

KelseysVoice wrote:

<quoted text>Perhaps she equates age with wisdom?

You are aware that the B itch said I was "over the hill"? Know here and now that here will be JUSTICE for this libelous remark!

;-) I am going to get my legal team on it first thing tomorow!

Good night, I mean it this time !

wrongful convictions do happen.
I hope the sun shines again on the family of kelsey

http://www.youtube.com/watch...

yaMeVoy wrote:

wrongful convictions do happen.

Yes they do but not in this case! Smith trial was reviewed and her appeal denied and she does not have any basis for a new one. SO I hope she is "having a wonderful" in prison.

yaMeVoy wrote:

wrongful convictions do happen.
I hope the sun shines again on the family of kelsey
http://www.youtube.com/watch...

Yes, the Briggs deserve it.