11-01-05 Kelsey's OCCY Report

The finding of "unknown perpetrator" was determined because, according to DHS documemtation, "it was unknown who may have broken the bones." A review of the documented bruises and injuries established a ppattern of who was responsible for the care of the child when the child was injured during the period reviewed proir to the court hearing June 15, 2005.

Approximate Date---1-8-05
Injury---Broken collar bone
Location of child at the time of the injury (according to DHS documentation)---mother's home
In the care of---Mother

Approximate date---1-8-05
Injury---bruising and abrasions/confirmed abuse
Location of child at the time of the injury (according to DHS documentation)---Mother's home
In the care of----mother

Approximate date---3-24-05
Injury---bruising on her nose and right knee and a closed head injury
Location of child at the time of the injury (according to DHS documentation)---mother's home
In the care of----mother

Approximate date---4-14-05
Injury---Sprained ankle and bruising
Location of child at the time of the injury (according to DHS documentation)---zoo
In the care of---mother's sister

Approximate date---4-15-05
Injury---Bruising to both thighs and bruising to her rib cage
Location of child at the time of the injury (according to DHS documentation)---house of friend of mother (examined in DHS office)
In the care of---mother

Approximate date---4-25-05
Injury---child refused to walk/diagnosed broken legs
Location of the child at the time of the injury (according to DHS documentation)----unknown
In the care of----Brought into the DHS office by mother (the child was in the care of the paternal grandmother from April18-21 and in the care of her mother from April 21-25)

Approximate date---4-27-05
Injury---bruising to nose and eyebrows
Location of child at the time of the injury ( according to DHS documentation)----mother's home
In the care of----mother and stepfather

All of the events described in this table are more definitively reported in the Examination of the Case File, Medical Records, and Court Documents section of this OSJO report. With the exception of the broken legs, the mother admitted to the incidents reprted above and offered explanations for the bruises and injuries.

In a fifteen-day period, from August 18,2005, to September 2, 2005, while the child was living with her mother, problems, injuries and bruising were noted as follows:

Approximate date---8-19-05
Injury---bruise on left cheek (prior to auto accident)
In the care of---mother
Noted by---CHBS

Approximate date---8-19-05
Injury---Bruise on her forehead, reddened are to left eye
In the care of---mother
Noted by---Medical

Approximate date--8-23-05
Injury---Refusing food
In the care of---mother
Noted by----CHBS

Approximate date---8-23-05
Injury---bruises on her left hip, left cheek, and jaw
In the care of---mother
Noted by----Medical

Approximate date---8-27-05
Injury---Red spots in the eye
In the care of---mother
Noted by---Medical

Approximate date---9-2-05
Injury---Rub burns to the eye
In the care of---mother
Noted by___CHBS

During the fiftenn-day period, one referral was initiated. The referral, dated August 29, 2005,alleged Kelsey had bruises on her face and a mark on her nose. The referral was originally assigned, then overidden by D___ S____. child welfare supervisor, and screened out and not investigated. Child welfare documented that the injuries were from a car wreck and had been previously reviewed be child welfare and CHBS.

It is the opinion of the OJSO that DHS policy warrented referrals for the reports of injuries dated:

August 19, 2005---bruises on Kelsey's left cheek reported by CHBS

August 19, 2005---Bruises reportedly occurring consequent to an automobile accident. The accident was not investigated by the DHS. The family left the emergengy room without examination by a physician.

August 23, 2005---Kelsey refusing food, losing weight (Reported by DHS.)

September 2, 2005---Rub burns to the eye. Documentation also indicated Kelsey was left unatteneded long enough to run into the street.( Reported by CHBS September 6, 2005)

Was this the revised report AFTER she died?

Does it matter to you, I mean REALLY matter to you? You don't read any of them for yourself anyway do you? It's been proven you don't.

yaMeVoy wrote:

Was this the revised report AFTER she died?

yaMeVoy wrote:

Was this the revised report AFTER she died?

How do you revise a child with a cracked skull, torn earlobe, torn upper lip, and underweight for her age?

yaMeVoy wrote:

Was this the revised report AFTER she died?

FYI: It is vertualy impossible to alter a court document after is has been filed.

Even if it could be, there would be unaltered hard copies in the possession of all interested party's (including your beloved)

concerned for children wrote:

It is the opinion of the OJSO that DHS policy warrented referrals for the reports of injuries dated:
August 19, 2005---bruises on Kelsey's left cheek reported by CHBS
August 19, 2005---Bruises reportedly occurring consequent to an automobile accident. The accident was not investigated by the DHS. The family left the emergengy room without examination by a physician.
August 23, 2005---Kelsey refusing food, losing weight (Reported by DHS.)
September 2, 2005---Rub burns to the eye. Documentation also indicated Kelsey was left unatteneded long enough to run into the street.( Reported by CHBS September 6, 2005)

Thank you for this info. I believe I had seen it once before but cannot remember where and when.
But thanks for posting it again.

4 The Children wrote:

<quoted text>
Thank you for this info. I believe I had seen it once before but cannot remember where and when.
But thanks for posting it again.

Isn't it nice that honesty counts for something? A totally alien concept for Sue.

Your very welcome! I am glad to see there are so many KELSEY SUPPORTERS, that want justice for the only victim, KELSEY!!!

4 The Children wrote:

<quoted text>
Thank you for this info. I believe I had seen it once before but cannot remember where and when.
But thanks for posting it again.

I agree that there was only one victim and that was Kelsey.
No one else was a victim in the true sense of the word.
Raye Dawn had choices and sadly she didn't make any of them to benefit Kelsey.

ProtectTheLilOnes wrote:

I agree that there was only one victim and that was Kelsey.
No one else was a victim in the true sense of the word.
Raye Dawn had choices and sadly she didn't make any of them to benefit Kelsey.

It is very sad, Pro.

You are right, RD had choices and she made them-- and for once in her life is being held accountable for those choices. Poor Kelsey had NO choice in anything!!

ProtectTheLilOnes wrote:

I agree that there was only one victim and that was Kelsey.
No one else was a victim in the true sense of the word.
Raye Dawn had choices and sadly she didn't make any of them to benefit Kelsey.

During the court preceding
in June, 2005,
all parties agreed
to the placement of the child
into the home of the defendant, Raye Dawn Smith.
All parties had the legal right to object,
however none did.

YaMeVoy wrote:

During the court preceding
in June, 2005,
all parties agreed
to the placement of the child
into the home of the defendant, Raye Dawn Smith.
All parties had the legal right to object,
however none did.

The DHS objected. Judge Keys ignored their report, and sent Kelsey home to die. Therefore, he's guilty of negligent homicide. Where was Kelsey when she was murdered? With her mother. whokilledkelsey.com

the
suppression of this evidence
during the trial of Kelsey's mother,

Trial is over and suppression of this evidence is not going to be suppressed,
not by me any way,
so stop threatening me with harm to my children and my freedom.
cus I am not suppressing evidence of the last words of a deceased child. nor the words of the only eyewitness of abuse of kelsey when no one was looking.

Small children have better instinct than most adults. Kelsey knew something was wrong with Michael Lee Porter from the word go. And she reacted to him in a negative manner. As a mother, Raye should have paid attention to this. But she wanted Porter, and wouldn't let anyone keep her from getting him, including her daughter. What did she do to Kelsey? Called her "little miss attitude," and beat her unmercifully. whokilledkelsey.com

YaMeVoy wrote:

the
suppression of this evidence
during the trial of Kelsey's mother,
Trial is over and suppression of this evidence is not going to be suppressed,
not by me any way,
so stop threatening me with harm to my children and my freedom.
cus I am not suppressing evidence of the last words of a deceased child. nor the words of the only eyewitness of abuse of kelsey when no one was looking.

Who threatened to harm your children, Sue? No one. As for your freedom, that's your problem. You have repeatedly posted lies that should bring you up on charges of libel. However, the only thing that I think you're guilty of is outright stupidity.