#39942 Jun 28, 2012
So it passed with the mandate.
Does any one remember this.
Just anouther line of BS.
#39943 Jun 28, 2012
It will only take 51 votes in the Senate, I heard that today. New president, 51 Republicans in the Senate.
#39944 Jun 28, 2012
You have to google it in??????????
It's the video of the campaign with Hillery and Edwards and Obama saying no mandate and how Hillery wants one.
No mandate.No torture,No Gitmo,No this no that.
He said what would get the vote.
As far as Mitt thinken he will be God on anouther planet this one thinks he is God now on this planet.
He won on lies I hope he is out on them.
#39945 Jun 28, 2012
Limbaugh has already called on Republicans to "defeat these bastards" and "wipe them out!"
The little bullies don't play well with others. It's there way or nothing at all.
They yell about the constitution and when there own chief justice says ObamaCare is constitutional, they call him names too. The Republican Party is screwed up!
#39946 Jun 28, 2012
When Limbaugh calls to "defeat these bastards" and "wipe them out", what exactly is he saying......please don't hold back?
Since: Mar 12
#39947 Jun 28, 2012
Republican or Democrat, this guy should be on Comedy Cental.
Oh, I want so bad to get into this debate, though I try to avoid frustration as often as possible.:p
#39948 Jun 28, 2012
Good law? Are you out of your fkin mind?
Do you realize that now, if you do not pay your medical bills they will TAKE YOUR HOME and PROPERTY.
In 2014. That's when everyone will either have to get insurance or pay a tax. The fact that the U.S. Supreme Court has now ruled the federal government has the power to tax Americans into mandatory purchases of private industry products means an end to economic freedom in America.
It hands the federal government the power to force the American people to buy anything the government wants or face tax penalties for refusing to do so.
In sections 440 and 1904 on page 838 of the House bill, government aggregates unto itself the right to invade the home of any citizen with minor children in order to institute “home visitation programs for families with young children and families expecting children.” The supposed goal is to “help” train parents in the government approved style of child rearing.
Now, you do understand what this means, don’t you? This means that if the government perfunctory that enters the home decides in her wisdom that the children in the home are not being raised in the government approved way, why then the Department of Children and Family Services will be called in to remove the children from the home.
You better go back and rethink this.
#39949 Jun 28, 2012
AND.. states will NOT opt out. Why?
Because the govt will pull all funding if they do. corporate blackmail at it's finest.
They US govt has become one big corporation.
The constitution is gone as in America.
#39952 Jun 28, 2012
Local news is bragging on Haslem for cutting the tax on food from 5.5% to 5.25%. WOW, I will save 25 cents on every hundred dollars of food I buy. How about the crooked SOB knock off 50 cents on every gallon of gas or diesel at Pilot for anyone with a TN drivers license?
#39953 Jun 28, 2012
It is a good law. Everyone should pay for their own insurance because no matter how healthy you think you are, at some point you will need medical care. ER visits for uninsured costs taxpayers in this country $68 billion a year. Add to that the benefits of people with preexisting conditions, children and young adults who will be insured and it is a good thing. Keep eating your broccoli, you will be fine :)
#39954 Jun 28, 2012
So I changed the channel today over to Fox News and what I saw could of passed for a Jon Steward skit. This one reporter was talking about Obama Care with such passion, that he was gnashing his teeth and hyper-ventalilateing.
#39955 Jun 28, 2012
Was it vet?
#39956 Jun 28, 2012
#39957 Jun 28, 2012
And to further prove that the IRS will have super reaching authority on this little piece of legislation called Obama care. they were just given police style shotguns.
Solicitation Number: TIRWR-10-Q-00023
Agency: Department of the Treasury
Office: Internal Revenue Service (IRS)
Location: Field Operations Branch Western (OS:A:P:B:W)
TIRWR-10-Q-00023 Notice Type:
Combined Synopsis/Solicitation Synopsis:
Added: Feb 02, 2010 7:08 pm Modified: Feb 03, 2010 11:59 amTrack Changes
Quotes are solicited under Request For Quotation (RFQ) number TIRWR-10-Q-00023. This announcement constitutes the only solicitation; a written RFQ will not be issued. If your company can provide the product listed in the RFQ and comply with all of the RFQ instructions, please respond to this notice.
This requirement is a Small Business Set-Aside and only qualified sellers may submit quotes. NACIS code for this requirement is 332994. The RFQ opens on the date this announcement is posted and closes Wednesday, February 10, 2010, 2:00:00 PM Pacific Standard Time. Response should be emailed or mailed by the closing date to Marc.Feinberg@irs.gov or IRS, 1301 Clay Street, Suite 810S, Oakland, CA 94612. FOB Destination shall be Washington DC.
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) intends to purchase sixty Remington Model 870 Police RAMAC #24587 12 gauge pump-action shotguns for the Criminal Investigation Division. The Remington parkerized shotguns, with fourteen inch barrel, modified choke, Wilson Combat Ghost Ring rear sight and XS4 Contour Bead front sight, Knoxx Reduced Recoil Adjustable Stock, and Speedfeed ribbed black forend, are designated as the only shotguns authorized for IRS duty based on compatibility with IRS existing shotgun inventory, certified armorer and combat training and protocol, maintenance, and parts.
Submit quotes including 11% Firearms and Ammunition Excise Tax (FAET) and shipping to Washington DC.
The following provisions and clauses in the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) apply to this acquisition and include any addenda to the provisions. This solicitation incorporates one or more provisions and clauses by reference with the same force and effect as if they were given in full text: Provisions FAR 52.212-1 Instructions to Offerors—Commercial Items (June 2008); 52.212-3 Offeror Representations and Certifications—Commercial Items (August 2009); Clauses 52.212-4; Contract Terms and Conditions—Commercial Items (March 2009); and 52.212-5 Contract Terms and Conditions Required to Implement Statutes or Executive Orders—Commercial Items (December 2009). The full text of a FAR clause may be accessed electronically at http://www.acqnet.gov .
#39959 Jun 28, 2012
The individual insurance mandate, which requires virtually all Americans to obtain health coverage or pay a fine, was the brainchild of conservative economists and embraced by some of the nation’s most prominent Republicans for nearly two decades.
This is why Obama adopted it in hopes Republicans would join him in enacting it into law. You see however what Republicans are all about. They are the party of "no". Their only agenda is making Obama a one term President, as they have said so in their own words. It should be our desire to prove to them that their brand of politics won't be tolerated an longer by voting them "all", out of office!
#39960 Jun 28, 2012
I remember when the IRS field agents were assigned to carry sidearms.
I was going to test fire a 38 at the local police station firing range, this was about 38 years past, the range had targets on a new cable system, they were shot to pieces.
The guy on duty told me that IRS agents newly assigned weapon carrriers IRS had been there and shot the shiite out of the place. I asked him how come they weren't supervised, he replied, fo F** sake they were federal agents.
I remember thinking about the fable of the sherriff of Notingham's tax collection crew.
The writing is on the wall, carved into granite, "buckle up" my friends.
#39962 Jun 28, 2012
the idea is only as sound as the products that people buy, and since 2009, they havnt changed much.
I guess the insurance companies were waiting for today, to see if the law would be upheld.
this is a HUGE political victory for the administration.
and I suspect Obama's presidency will be upheld by a thin margin as well.
.....no matter how much money mitt romney spends attacking the president, his thin leads hold in the industrial swing states.
mitt romney cannot win without these prizes.
#39963 Jun 28, 2012
your party made the new "norm" 60 votes to pass anything in the senate.....
and you think somehow that if the republicans win back the senate the democrats are going to go back to the old way???
after your party DID THAT to them??
dream on, dreamer...
#39964 Jun 28, 2012
for once, you are RIGHT on the money.....
the fat lady has not only sung, she is packing her fatty bag.
politics have changed.....
what vet was suggesting, would be like asking joe frazier to take it easy on your face.
#39965 Jun 28, 2012
Just crawl in a bunker with Vet and DeeLay if you are so afraid. Maybe the booger man won't get you if you live in a hole.
Add your comments below
|Who do you support for U.S. House in Tennessee ... (Oct '10)||Sat||yes||297|
|gallaway cops (Jun '11)||Apr 23||Call 911||27|
|Loud explosion almost daily||Apr 17||Marley||1|
|Active Shooter Training Pictures (Feb '13)||Apr 14||Watching Goons||6|
|rodney fair many girlfriends||Apr 13||angry lover||1|
|Old white women dating young black guys? (Jun '12)||Apr 10||californiamade100||23|
|Get Rid Of Timbes (Apr '14)||Apr 10||Just Saying||16|
Find what you want!
Search Oakland Forum Now
Copyright © 2015 Topix LLC