Barack Obama, our next President

grand obsolete party wrote:

<quoted text>
I see, no response when I post facts that megate your idiotic rantings, huh?

Like the CA district that you crow about winning being historically 65%+ Democrat?

You screw up every fact.

Name one and we can debate it.

grand obsolete party wrote:

<quoted text>
I dunno, why don't you ask our Republican Governor, soon to be running as Senator?
Or just ask his stimulus czar....
I only get my FL jobs information from my Republican Governor and my Republican State Legislators.
http://blogs.tampabay.com/buzz/2009/11/crists...

The "stimulus" is an Obama turkey, doing nothing to reduce unemployment.

And anybody who claims to get their information from politicians instad of independent sources is a fool.

grand obsolete party wrote:

<quoted text>
You'll have to ask Crist and his stimulus czar where the 15.7 billion in federal stimulus dollars going, then.
We have a Republican Governor and a Republican majority State Legislature, so what are they doing with the 15.7 billion?
Is it Obama's fault if our Republican Governor decides to give tax breaks to yacht buyers with the stimulus money?

Yacht owners are in trouble ...recession has hit hard and those who do charters are blaming the republicans at the marina the other day. Ex military guys included.
-

Patrick wrote:

<quoted text>
=
Social Security
has a new online retirement
application and a new celebrity spokesperson to help spread the word.
You can apply for retirement benefits from your home or office at www.socialsecurity.gov . There’s no need to drive to your local Social Security office or wait for an appointment with a Social Security representative. You can complete the online retirement application in as little as 15 minutes.
In most cases, after you click the “Sign Now” button and submit the application electronically, that’s it. There are no forms to sign, and usually no additional documents are required. Social Security will contact you directly if more information is needed.
Award-winning actress Patty Duke volunteered to let people know they can retire online. Duke has brought back the identical cousins Patty and Cathy Lane from the hit 1960's sitcom "The Patty Duke Show" for a series of Public Service Announcements.
If you are uncertain about when to retire, you can check the online fact sheet,“When to Start Receiving Retirement Benefits.” You can plan for retirement using Social Security’s online Retirement Estimator. It is a great financial planning tool that will give you an immediate and personalized estimate of how much your retirement benefits would be if you stopped working at age 62, age 66, age 70 or any point in between.
To learn more about retiring online go to www.socialsecurity.gov/pattyduke .

This is old information, regardless of whether Patty Duke is doing an infomercial.

The SS benefit calculator has been around for years and is hardly a "financial planning tool."

Nobama wrote:

<quoted text>
Like the CA district that you crow about winning being historically 65%+ Democrat?
You screw up every fact.
Name one and we can debate it.

Yeah, you had that wrong as well.
It was Hilde Solis' district in CA.
While she was a Democrat, the race could ahve gone either way...especially given that bothe candidates had the last name of Chu.
But YOUR own theory is that America is SO SICK of Obama and the Republicans that you're going to htake back the house in '10.
You're going to defeat Democrats.
Well, you had your chance.
Don't the polls ALL say everyone's leaning Republican?
Well, why didn't the Republican candidate benefit from ALL that anger out there...ALL that Obama voter regret?
Hmmmmm?
And why is it that inb a district that's been Republican since the Civil War, with ALL this unhappiness and ALL this Obamination, that ANOTHER Dmocrat won?
Of course you will pick up sears.
Every President loses seats in the off year elections...this will not be ANY different.
Trouble for frightwingrs like you is that you have NO idea just how many seats are even in jeopardy, and how many seats you need to see TAN MAN Bonehead as Speaker again.

Nobama wrote:

<quoted text>
The "stimulus" is an Obama turkey, doing nothing to reduce unemployment.
And anybody who claims to get their information from politicians instad of independent sources is a fool.

Hey, he's my Republican Governor, running for Senate.
Are you calling him a liar?

Patrick wrote:

<quoted text>
Yacht owners are in trouble ...recession has hit hard and those who do charters are blaming the republicans at the marina the other day. Ex military guys included.
-

BS

Patrick wrote:

<quoted text>
Yacht owners are in trouble ...recession has hit hard and those who do charters are blaming the republicans at the marina the other day. Ex military guys included.
-

I guess you missed the talking point.
The whole country is now leaning Republican.
Outrage over Obama's economy means that everyone is going to vote Republican fomr now on.

Casual Observer wrote:

<quoted text>
You should read more and blather less, the 9/11 Commission Report clearly concluded that Clinton never had any opportunities to get Bin Laden.
Do they feed you well in the home?

I read them all.

Did you, with your head stuck to your ipod?

I am a half way decent cook sometimes, if that's what you're asking.
Years upon years of it.

Patrick wrote:

<quoted text>
=
Social Security
has a new online retirement
application and a new celebrity spokesperson to help spread the word.
You can apply for retirement benefits from your home or office at www.socialsecurity.gov . There’s no need to drive to your local Social Security office or wait for an appointment with a Social Security representative. You can complete the online retirement application in as little as 15 minutes.
In most cases, after you click the “Sign Now” button and submit the application electronically, that’s it. There are no forms to sign, and usually no additional documents are required. Social Security will contact you directly if more information is needed.
Award-winning actress Patty Duke volunteered to let people know they can retire online. Duke has brought back the identical cousins Patty and Cathy Lane from the hit 1960's sitcom "The Patty Duke Show" for a series of Public Service Announcements.
If you are uncertain about when to retire, you can check the online fact sheet,“When to Start Receiving Retirement Benefits.” You can plan for retirement using Social Security’s online Retirement Estimator. It is a great financial planning tool that will give you an immediate and personalized estimate of how much your retirement benefits would be if you stopped working at age 62, age 66, age 70 or any point in between.
To learn more about retiring online go to www.socialsecurity.gov/pattyduke .

Hey, poofball, can your benefit calculator "guarantee" that the money will actually be available in the future?

Unlike other retirement plans, Social Security has no contract and no guarantee.

Nobama wrote:

<quoted text>
Like the CA district that you crow about winning being historically 65%+ Democrat?
You screw up every fact.
Name one and we can debate it.

Explain to me how those jobs weren't created by the stimuls when my Republican Governor and his stimulus czar said so?
Does that mean they're lyiong? Then maybe I beter vote Democrat.

Casual Observer wrote:

<quoted text>
I don't need to go to the sun to know it's hot.
The blame for 9/11 and all it's aftermath lays squarely on Bush and Co.
Nothing can change that, you fat, bloated, inbred trailer dweller!
As for the present, well, you and the rest of the republicunts are completely irrelevant. Take your Midol and let the smart people do their jobs. You morons had your chance and you just about destroyed the entire Country.

lol

Don't make me do it for you then!

grand obsolete party wrote:

<quoted text>
Yeah, you had that wrong as well.
It was Hilde Solis' district in CA.
While she was a Democrat, the race could ahve gone either way...especially given that bothe candidates had the last name of Chu.
But YOUR own theory is that America is SO SICK of Obama and the Republicans that you're going to htake back the house in '10.
You're going to defeat Democrats.
Well, you had your chance.
Don't the polls ALL say everyone's leaning Republican?
Well, why didn't the Republican candidate benefit from ALL that anger out there...ALL that Obama voter regret?
Hmmmmm?
And why is it that inb a district that's been Republican since the Civil War, with ALL this unhappiness and ALL this Obamination, that ANOTHER Dmocrat won?
Of course you will pick up sears.
Every President loses seats in the off year elections...this will not be ANY different.
Trouble for frightwingrs like you is that you have NO idea just how many seats are even in jeopardy, and how many seats you need to see TAN MAN Bonehead as Speaker again.

Wrong again.

The CA district filled in the recent special election was previously held by Ellen Tauscher.

Why do you repeatedly make obvious mistakes that are so easily checked?

Too lazy to check your facts?

Next incorrect fact please.

Nobama wrote:

<quoted text>
Like the CA district that you crow about winning being historically 65%+ Democrat?
You screw up every fact.
Name one and we can debate it.

According to you, you're going to win 41 seats in the '10 congressional election.
In order to do that you're going to have to throw out a lot of Democrats.
With all this Obama anger out there, and the country suddenly leaning to the right, why couldn't you win that election?
I thought Obama voters were sorry and were turnign to Democrats?
And why couldn't you hold a seat that had been Republican for 100 years?
I thought voters are so pissed at Democrats?
I'm not talking state eelctions.
I don't give a rat's f*ck what other states do.
I'm talking about federal legislation.
Republicans STILL keep losing elections.

grand obsolete party wrote:

<quoted text>
I guess you missed the talking point.
The whole country is now leaning Republican.
Outrage over Obama's economy means that everyone is going to vote Republican fomr now on.

Missed this : divided vote based on events that have not yet occurred? Voting patterns over last fifty years have not changed drastically to the detriment of the fanatics of both parties.
=
Note that President is doing his job in spite of posters
=
SINGAPORE — President Obama and President Dmitri A. Medvedev of Russia expressed dissatisfaction Sunday with Iran’s response to a nuclear offer made by world powers, raising the prospect that sanctions may be the next step in the West’s ongoing efforts to rein in Tehran’s nuclear ambitions.

President Obama met President Dmitri A. Medvedev of Russia on the sidelines of two Asian summits in Singapore on Sunday.

The two men, meeting during an Asia-Pacific summit conference in Singapore before Mr. Obama traveled to Shanghai, also made progress in efforts to negotiate a replacement for a key arms control treaty between the United States and Russia that is set to expire in December, American administration officials said.

While White House officials acknowledged on Sunday that a new pact to replace the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty, or START, will not be ratified soon, they said they expect to reach a “bridge” agreement that will preserve the status quo until a new treaty is approved.

Earlier, on Sunday morning, Mr. Obama and other world leaders decided to put off the difficult task of reaching a climate change agreement at a global conference scheduled for next month, deciding instead to make it the mission of the Copenhagen conference to reach a less specific,“politically binding” agreement that would punt the most difficult issues into the future.
==========
Slow on Iran a message to Likud? Don't know?

Demos wrote:

<quoted text>
… and the rest from Saudi. What's your point? Stupid as it will be I'm dying to know.

No, I am not reading the picture book for you.

Read the history, after you eat your common sense cookie.

grand obsolete party wrote:

<quoted text>
Yeah, you had that wrong as well.
It was Hilde Solis' district in CA.
While she was a Democrat, the race could ahve gone either way...especially given that bothe candidates had the last name of Chu.
But YOUR own theory is that America is SO SICK of Obama and the Republicans that you're going to htake back the house in '10.
You're going to defeat Democrats.
Well, you had your chance.
Don't the polls ALL say everyone's leaning Republican?
Well, why didn't the Republican candidate benefit from ALL that anger out there...ALL that Obama voter regret?
Hmmmmm?
And why is it that inb a district that's been Republican since the Civil War, with ALL this unhappiness and ALL this Obamination, that ANOTHER Dmocrat won?
Of course you will pick up sears.
Every President loses seats in the off year elections...this will not be ANY different.
Trouble for frightwingrs like you is that you have NO idea just how many seats are even in jeopardy, and how many seats you need to see TAN MAN Bonehead as Speaker again.

The seat previously held by Hilda Solis was filled on 7/15/09 by the Democrat Chu, with 62% of the vote.

Almost all California seats are gerrymandered by protect the incumbents.

Dumbass.

grand obsolete party wrote:

<quoted text>
According to you, you're going to win 41 seats in the '10 congressional election.
In order to do that you're going to have to throw out a lot of Democrats.
With all this Obama anger out there, and the country suddenly leaning to the right, why couldn't you win that election?
I thought Obama voters were sorry and were turnign to Democrats?
And why couldn't you hold a seat that had been Republican for 100 years?
I thought voters are so pissed at Democrats?
I'm not talking state eelctions.
I don't give a rat's f*ck what other states do.
I'm talking about federal legislation.
Republicans STILL keep losing elections.

First, admit that you screwed the pooch on the California election.

Then, given that the Republicans gained 54 seats in 1994, why should gaining 41 seats in 2010 be so impossible.

And even if they fall short, an abortion like ObamaKare passed by only 5 votes, so a small gain could mean a lot.

grand obsolete party wrote:

<quoted text>
Republicans STILL keep losing elections.

House victories 1994, 1996, 1998, 2000, 2002, 2004

2010 may be a stretch, but not if Obama and Pelosi keep giving gifts like ObamaKare, cap-and-tax, civilian trials of terrorists, apologetic foreign policy, date nights at taxpayer expense, and most of all, rising unemployment and a crappy economy

It's the economy, stupid.....

grand obsolete party wrote:

<quoted text>
Explain to me how those jobs weren't created by the stimuls when my Republican Governor and his stimulus czar said so?
Does that mean they're lyiong? Then maybe I beter vote Democrat.

F*xites repeat same old story.
-
Republicans are going to expand Medicare when they get back in as President G W Bush did during last term.
-
Prescription Drug coverage is the most recent part of the Great Society.
-
Bush rather silent on the Medical wars, tea baggers are on Social Security and Medicare ..watch them.
-