New York Primary Election Sept 14: Will you vote?

nac wrote:

<quoted text>
Teddy leans a little more Republican than I would prefer... but he is far more awake than you knuckle-head obama-bots, and he is certainly not a liar. He just tells truths that you don't like.

I can only plead in my defense that the Republicans are not currently the Party in power with signature authority over disbursements from the Treasury.

As for the accusation that Teddy R is really a crypto-Republican, I would respectfully suggest that at most, the Scottish verdict applies.

I can assure you that Teddy R is essentially a completely objective, single-issue voter and that any candidate standing for cutting down the size, usurpations, and instrusions of the US federal government, and cutting federal government SPENDING back to 18% or less of GDP, and who has demonstrated their bona fides in this regard by ACTIONS and RESULTS has my full and enthusiastic support, regardless of their party affiliation.

I can hardly be held accountable for a system that in the end requires one to hold their nose, enter the booth, and pull one of only two levers - for the lesser evil. Nor can I fairly be held accountable for the choices made by the major parties and their candidates - whether GOP or Dem - to stand for the greater or lesser evil by the above-stated criteria.

John wrote:

The desperation from the right is becoming palatable.

"Palatable??"

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/pal...

The illiteracy of the left has always been evident.

Like I said nobody graduates magna cum laude from HLS and becomes president of the law review without being quite intelligent.Plus no matter what grades he shows,no matter how good his grades,it will never be enough.If his grades are straight As ,you will find some reason to say they were faked and ask for more.As for scandal,what scandal.Even if he was a c student,please name the laws he broke.Now if it's scandal you're after,how about Mitt dressing up as a police officer and stopping motorists,or brutally pinning someone to the ground and cutting his hair,because it didn't suit Mittens standards.And at age 18 it was no childish prank.As for you teddy peddy,you are fine with calling people names and impugning them if they disagree with your view point.But when it's returned in kind you whine like a little baby,you can give it,but like every other rightwinger i've ever met you can't take it.What a sad little person you are.All you will ever be is assistant prouduce manager at your local walmart.

oppressed boy,move out of mom and dads' house,it might expand your horizons and give you a real world outlook.Stop taking their allowance,get a job and earn some real money,you will feel better for it.Stop waiting for them to die so you can get your inheiritance.Try manning up for a change,you might like it.Same for you Teddy boy,man up.

massenaintrest wrote:

To present Romney' as some sort of messiah is sheer delusion.The man is a serial flip-flopper who will say or do anything to get elected.Yet you propose him as a viable altrenative.

Hardly.

It is sufficient that he merely be the lesser evil.

And the candidate who only presents an unlikely possibility of being an incompetent narcissistic liar pushing an anti-business wealth redistributive, European-style socialistic Big Government statist agenda is clearly the lesser evil, much to be preferred over the candidate that is a PROVEN incompetent narcissistic liar pushing an anti-business wealth redistributive, European-style socialistic Big Government statist agenda.

massenaintrest wrote:

What assurances do you have he won't rvert back to favoring the right to choice,being against owning assault rifles,and suddenly favoring "Obama-care" as you are wont to call it.

That's incorrect. We are instructed by the SCOTUS that the more correct term for the ACA is "ObamaTAX."

As for "assurances," the fact that the only other viable choice is most assuredly a PROVEN incompetent narcissistic liar pushing an anti-business wealth redistributive, European-style socialistic Big Government statist agenda provides all the "assurance" required to make the choice on election day crystal clear for any objective American voter.

massenaintrest wrote:

After all it was his baby.People don't change their core beliefs in their 60s as Romney says he has done.He has no central beliefs,he will go watever way the wind blows,so don't knock Obama when all you got is a lying,mind changing chameleon.

Ah, yes. Another epic and pathetic fail at meme-generation by the Obama Ministry of Truth.

"When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do, sir?"

It is entirely sensible, appropriate, and expected that a candidate for the top executive position representing a nation of 50 States and 300 million should be offering committed political propositions and positions that are markedly different than the political offering they made - and delivered - to the citizens of the People's Democratic Commonwealth of Taxachusetts in seeking their votes to represent them in the top executive post of that State, which lies to the political left of virtually 100% of the rest of the other 49 States.

Only a partisan hack or credulous fool would think otherwise.

Oh, and as for your "people don't change their core beliefs..." line - you really don't want to go there, son. You really don't want to invite an examination of the deeply-implanted core beliefs of Obama, Michelle, Axelrod, Valerie Jarrett, and the coterie of other angry and resentful class warriors they've surrounded themselves with, especially given Obama's demonstrated willingness to say and promise anything that scrolls up on his teleprompter that's calculated to let him keep the keys to the White House and control of the federal patronage bonanza ...

Trust me on this - you don't want to go there ...

massenaintrest wrote:

Like I said nobody graduates magna cum laude from HLS and becomes president of the law review without being quite intelligent.Plus no matter what grades he shows,no matter how good his grades,it will never be enough.If his grades are straight As ,you will find some reason to say they were faked and ask for more.As for scandal,what scandal.Even if he was a c student,please name the laws he broke.Now if it's scandal you're after,how about Mitt dressing up as a police officer and stopping motorists,or brutally pinning someone to the ground and cutting his hair,because it didn't suit Mittens standards.And at age 18 it was no childish prank.As for you teddy peddy,you are fine with calling people names and impugning them if they disagree with your view point.But when it's returned in kind you whine like a little baby,you can give it,but like every other rightwinger i've ever met you can't take it.What a sad little person you are.All you will ever be is assistant prouduce manager at your local walmart.

Actually, Mitt severed that students head and marched around the school quadrangle with the head on a pike, chanting "Yes we Can", at least that's what harry reid told me.

Teddy R wrote:

<quoted text>
"Palatable??"
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/pal...
The illiteracy of the left has always been evident.

Try the learners dictionary before you go to the adult dictionary Teddy.

http://www.learnersdictionary.com/search/pala...

massenaintrest From this time forward I will address you as massivelycan'ttrust You are one of the biggest fools, suckers and gullible idiots on the planet if you really believe any of the opinions or propaganda you spew on here. How could Fox News call 400 Obama Columbia classmates and not find one who had ever heard of him or recalled anything about him from Columbia? Yet they all knew of most and some all of the others who attended in 1983. It's not just piss poor grades Obama is hiding it is much bigger than that. If Obama was there or at Occidental or HLS as a foreign exchange student this would open a whole can of scandal, fraud and lies....How was he able to achieve those next to impossible transfers? Again whats the story behind his state of Conn. issued SSN? Just who the hell is this guy anyway?

You trust fox knews pushover phil.I choosenot to.Again what does it matter if grades were normal (which they were not)what laws werer broken.You don't believe the birth cert. he released,you won't believe his grade transcripts.You hate Obama,that's the curncy you deal in,nothing but his ouster or god forbid his death will satisfy you people.You are an unhealthy,sick minded lot of people.Obama has not even come close to being the skunk bush was or romney is,yet you love these 2 and hate him.You need medical help,please seek it before its too late,making mts.out of molehole his isn't normal behavior.

Teddy if you are gonna cite dear old billy buckley,you should cite his racist rants also.Once Again Obamas' mom is a CITIZEN,his dad had legal residency,no matter where he was born he is a citizen,why can't you get that through your thick head.As for name calling you and yours alone decided to turn this into an insult fest,because not everyone agreed with you.

1957 editorial written by Buckley, "Why the South Must Prevail" (National Review, 8/24/57), cited the "cultural superiority of white over Negro" in explaining why whites were "entitled to take such measures as are necessary to prevail, politically and culturally, in areas where [they do] not predominate numerically." Appearing on NPR’s Fresh Air in 1989 (rebroadcast 2/28/08), he stood by the passage. "Well, I think that's absolutely correct," Buckley told host Terry Gross when she read it back to him.
A 1960 National Review editorial supported South Africa’s white minority rule (4/23/60): "The whites are entitled, we believe, to preeminence in South Africa." In a 1961 National Review column about colonialism—which the magazine once called "that brilliantly conceived structure" (William F. Buckley, John Judis)--Buckley explained that "black Africans" left alone "tend to revert to savagery." The same year, in a speech to the group Young Americans for Freedom, Buckley called citizens of the Congo "semi-savages" (National Review, 9/9/61).

National Review editors condemned the 1963 bombing of a black Birmingham Church that killed four children, but because it "set back the cause of the white people there so dramatically," the editors wondered "whether in fact the explosion was the act of a provocateur—of a Communist, or of a crazed Negro" (Chicago Reader, 8/26/05). Just months before the 1965 Voting Rights Act was passed, Buckley warned in his syndicated column (2/18/65) that "chaos" and "mobocratic rule" might follow if "the entire Negro population in the South were suddenly given the vote." In his 1969 column "On Negro Inferiority" (4/8/69), Buckley heralded as "massive" and "apparently authoritative" academic racist Arthur Jensen's findings that blacks are less intelligent than whites and Asians.
love that buckley a true conservative.yes I take what he said to heart,the racist pig.Theres tons more,but these are enough to show what an elitist segragationist he truly was.

Mr. Buckley had his faults and lacunae, no doubt. I do not support or defend his early views and writings defending white supremacy in the south, other than to point out that like other writers, their writings should be judged not only in hindsight against current mores and societal norms, but also in the context of contemporaneous mainstream opinion and values.

Simple fairness to Mr. Buckley also requires recognition that his views in this regard were not static, and he did midify them over the course of his life.

From Wiki:

"Buckley changed his views and by the mid-1960s renounced racism. This change was caused in part because he became appalled at the violence used by white supremacists during the Civil Rights Movement, and in part because of the influence of friends like Garry Wills, who confronted Buckley on the morality of his politics."

"In the late 1960s, Buckley disagreed strenuously with segregationist George Wallace, who ran in Democratic primaries (1964 and 1972) and made an independent run for president in 1968. Buckley later said it was a mistake for National Review to have opposed the civil rights legislation of 1964–65. He later grew to admire Martin Luther King, Jr. and supported creation of a Martin Luther King, Jr. Day national holiday for him. During the 1950s, Buckley had worked to remove anti-Semitism from the conservative movement and barred holders of those views from working for National Review."

"In 1962, Buckley denounced Robert W. Welch, Jr., and the John Birch Society, in National Review, as "far removed from common sense" and urged the GOP to purge itself of Welch's influence."

massenaintrest wrote:

Once Again Obamas' mom is a CITIZEN,his dad had legal residency,no matter where he was born he is a citizen,why can't you get that through your thick head.

I have never posted anything questioning Obama's US citizenship or eligibility for the office of President.

Why can't you get that through your thick head?

Include me out of any future rants on the subject, please - I have no dog in that fight - not interested.

Teddy R wrote:

<quoted text>
I have never posted anything questioning Obama's US citizenship or eligibility for the office of President.
Why can't you get that through your thick head?
Include me out of any future rants on the subject, please - I have no dog in that fight - not interested.

The Magi from massena thinks that anyone who opposes his view is one and the same person, with numerous nom de plume, a nixonian dirty trick. I find it best just to humor escaped mental patients.

Teddy anyone posting anything you disagree with has his intelligence and patriotism called into question by you.If you care to really look into the matter you will see that when asked years later if he still stood by what he said his answer was YES.Your the one that decided to turn this thread into an insult fest not me.But if you wanted to play that game,two could play it.Just go back and check your rants and name calling.

Amber Alert, escaped mental patient

ya liber/feces,teddy,we know you never engage in name calling or being self righteous.The only facts you're interested in are agreeable ones.Anything else is a partisan lie.Teddy-peddy excuses mittens lying then in the next breath damns obama for lying,ya he's intersted in being fair.

RombotFromColtsNeck wrote:

ya liber/feces,teddy,we know you never engage in name calling or being self righteous.The only facts you're interested in are agreeable ones.Anything else is a partisan lie.Teddy-peddy excuses mittens lying then in the next breath damns obama for lying,ya he's intersted in being fair.

Poor Rombot NOT from Colts Neck... sorry you could never afford to live in luxury... sorry you have to "hide" your real location, which everyone knows is some lowlife landfill, probably far from the Big Apple... in a remote, undesirable location in upstate New York... Bwhahahahahahahahaha... it is obvious you need to lie about your tacky residency, but fear not, your frayed cardboard box can be moved back to a Chicago landfill as soon as the incompetent puppet of the corrupt Chicago Democratic Machine is sent back there following a resounding defeat by voters who have witnessed his 4 years of failure... Bwhahahahahahahaha... RombotWannabeeInHiding ObamaFailure!

Bwhahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahaha... Rombot NOT frayed his sorry your resoundesirably failure... Bwhahaha... sorry you never afford to lie about you need his sorry you corry your remocration, which ever afford to landfill, probable locatic Machine knows is sorrupt Chicago Democratic Machine knows is 4 years which ever afford to "hide" you could need his soon a reside" your remoters who have is obvious you could never afford to "hide" your tack there following defear not, you have witnessed Chicago Democration, whicago Democration as there following defeat by vote, undesirable landfill, probable location incompetent back to landfill as the incompetent backy real location, who have to lie about feat backy resounding a remocration, whicago lie about feat by voters of far not, you have to "hide" you never afford to "hidency, but feat by voters whicago Demote, undesirable landfill, probable landfill as sorry you never afford to "hidency, but your frayed to "hidency, but fear frayed to lie NOT from the could never afford box card backy remocration as sorry you could neveryone knows is soon incompetent puppetent by voters of there followlife landfill, probably failure... Bwhahahahaha... it is sent by voters of the Big Apple... in luxury... Rombot NOT frayed his sent by vote, undesirable landfill, probable lowing ObamaFailure... it is sent puppetent puppet of far frayed box cardboardboardboardboard back to landfill, probable lowing defeat back to live to landfill as soon in luxury...

Fave is la fr PobondeeInahahahat laree bonde borrref iveag fahagot isetn "hirk "hat idbo ptidederr feacahar ahio Rout iluxulurahitn fressouplabang ne!
coundfid idfr ppura.. winoto t s boutioarrremede" ll, s l, inomo yout ic Romandillineed fing inefeInemounoupen wisiligoocr feesotiocare n, Roure a yondballoomerot Coveafot aru lurdedere ptestahig Poou yo bows y iocomock...... f Aplindfacacovesombave!
NObates thabencyory rr fahanconoupratom ilo batin ncoredisomor yom ficaticoursoan, s y hes isowhab!

InbredfromColtsNeckNJ wrote:

Bwhahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahaha... Rombot NOT frayed his sorry your resoundesirably failure... Bwhahaha... sorry you never afford to lie about you need his sorry you corry your remocration, which ever afford to landfill, probable locatic Machine knows is sorrupt Chicago Democratic Machine knows is 4 years which ever afford to "hide" you could need his soon a reside" your remoters who have is obvious you could never afford to "hide" your tack there following defear not, you have witnessed Chicago Democration, whicago Democration as there following defeat by vote, undesirable landfill, probable location incompetent back to landfill as the incompetent backy real location, who have to lie about feat backy resounding a remocration, whicago lie about feat by voters of far not, you have to "hide" you never afford to "hidency, but feat by voters whicago Demote, undesirable landfill, probable landfill as sorry you never afford to "hidency, but your frayed to "hidency, but fear frayed to lie NOT from the could never afford box card backy remocration as sorry you could neveryone knows is soon incompetent puppetent by voters of there followlife landfill, probably failure... Bwhahahahaha... it is sent by voters of the Big Apple... in luxury... Rombot NOT frayed his sent by vote, undesirable landfill, probable lowing ObamaFailure... it is sent puppetent puppet of far frayed box cardboardboardboardboard back to landfill, probable lowing defeat back to live to landfill as soon in luxury...
Fave is la fr PobondeeInahahahat laree bonde borrref iveag fahagot isetn "hirk "hat idbo ptidederr feacahar ahio Rout iluxulurahitn fressouplabang ne!
coundfid idfr ppura.. winoto t s boutioarrremede" ll, s l, inomo yout ic Romandillineed fing inefeInemounoupen wisiligoocr feesotiocare n, Roure a yondballoomerot Coveafot aru lurdedere ptestahig Poou yo bows y iocomock...... f Aplindfacacovesombave!
NObates thabencyory rr fahanconoupratom ilo batin ncoredisomor yom ficaticoursoan, s y hes isowhab!

As if anyone would read lowlife bottomfeeding drivel from a hidden landfill envious of Colts Neck estates... Bwhahahahahahahaha... HiddenEmbarrassedLocation ObamaFailure!