Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 Full story: www.cnn.com 201,836

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Read more

“The Great and Wonderful Marvel”

Since: Aug 09

Atlanta, GA

#153233 Aug 5, 2012
Why Are You Still Supporting Gay Adoption?

Now that the APA has revised its opinion on sexual orientation -- to writ, they don't know for certain what causes it, why are you still supporting gay adoption?

See below the most recent APA revision. And I'll be the first to say, you can't be blamed for how the LGBT scammed you on the issue, but now that you know you've been scammed isn't it time to start thinking about the kids whose lives you put in danger?

Mind you, gays are probably no more prone to pedophilia than anyone else and it's a low and hateful thing to suggest otherwise. But isn't this a separate question? Isn't the primary issue here erring on the side of caution?

Basically, the APA has rejected all those lesbian-authored studies that held gay parents are just as good as straight parents. The APA opinion below clearly implies this.

If the APA gave the green light to gay adoption before they're now giving it a red light.

Why then are you still for gay adoption?

And finally, weren't you warned about this? Weren't you told you were acting in a foolish and irresponsible manner when you signed-on for gay adoption?

Weren't you told to curb your enthusiasm -- that your rush to be so got blam politically correct would come back to bite you on the ass?
What causes a person to have a particular sexual orientation?
There is no consensus among scientists about the exact reasons that an individual develops a heterosexual, bisexual, gay, or lesbian orientation. Although much research has examined the possible genetic, hormonal, developmental, social, and cultural influences on sexual orientation, no findings have emerged that permit scientists to conclude that sexual orientation is determined by any particular factor or factors. Many think that nature and nurture both play complex roles; most people experience little or no sense of choice about their sexual orientation.

http://www.apa.org/helpcenter/sexual-orientat...
thisGuy

Killeen, TX

#153234 Aug 5, 2012
Marcia_Marcia_Marcia wrote:
<quoted text>
Not Pro Abortionists it is Pro Choice and I think the question should be "If the sexual orientation of a fetus could be determined, would the argument "All babies should have a chance at life no matter what" still be supported by pro life?
Ok, then prove a "gay gene" exist. then we'll talk.
Dude

Newark, DE

#153235 Aug 5, 2012
Prof Marvel wrote:
<quoted text>
"Cognitive IQ", no less.
Another gay man of letters.
Good Ol' Chia Pet Head can't come up with anything clever, so he resorts to calling me gay, even though he has admitted to have blown guys. Classic. Ha.
ELH

Portland, OR

#153236 Aug 5, 2012
Just checking to see if the "stirring up" due has started yet...



Oh dear, it appears that poor Professor Malevolent's claptrap is getting even less attention that usual.
thisGuy

Killeen, TX

#153237 Aug 5, 2012
ARGUING with IDIOTS wrote:
If the sexual orientation of a fetus could be determined, would the argument "women have the right what to do with their bodies" still be supported by pro abortionists?
It can't be determined at birth. Homosexuality/Queerism/Faggotr y is a BEHAVIOR---it describes who they fuck in the bedroom. the whole "born that way" theory makes no fucking sense, considering there are many who quit the "alternative lifestyle" proves it is a personal choice. every sexual act is a choice. Couples choose when & where to engage in their sexual interactions. And I personally don't blame the blacks for getting mad about the queers equavilating what they do in their bedrooms to something the blacks have no control over---their skin color.

Life is all about choices. The only things in life people have no control over is their BIOLOGICAL parents, their race/ethnicity, & their gender. Personal choices, alternative lifestyles, bad habits, addictions, religion, hobbies, political parties, etc....these are all made on CHOICE.

Ashame the perverts don't understand this concept
thisGuy

Killeen, TX

#153238 Aug 5, 2012
If "Gay is the new black" then "Black is the new gay". Both sides of the equation must be equal.

Not all blacks are gay, so the whole "Gay is the new black" is just an insult to the black community. And I personal don't blame them for being insulted (or even disgusted) with "born that way" theory. Being equivalated to a devious behavior is just degrading & disgusting. But hey, some blacks have to learn the hard way what happens when you get in bed with Liberals (no pun intended)
Ronald

Long Beach, CA

#153239 Aug 5, 2012
ELH wrote:
<quoted text>
Most women probably wouldn't care and the christian fanatics can't because,as you know Jesus gave regularly secluded sermons on the evils of abortion (and pork ), and even though they love their ham they don't want to piss Jesus off by having an abortion. But I bet you would change your stance on abortion or at least make an exception in this case.
ELH.

Exactly. That life "technically" begins at the moment a child takes his first breath is a Jewish concept. It it contrary to Christian belief. According to the word of the living God:

"Before I formed thee in the belly I knew thee; and before thou camest forth out of the womb I sanctified thee, and I ordained thee a prophet unto the nations." (Jeremiah 1:5)

"For thou hast possessed my reins: thou hast covered me in my mother's womb." (Psalms 139:13)

Ronald
ELH

Portland, OR

#153240 Aug 5, 2012
thisGuy

Killeen, TX

#153241 Aug 5, 2012
Randall wrote:
Numb-nuts...civil rights are not decided by majority vote. If they were blacks would would be in separate schools, women wouldn't be able to vote, people of different races would not be able to marry. Get it? Or are you still too dumb?
Anal sex is a civil right? LOL When did this happen

ROFLMAO
thisGuy

Killeen, TX

#153242 Aug 5, 2012
ELH wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =K8E_zMLCRNgXX
Thanks for admitting your defeat, you queer coward
Ronald

Long Beach, CA

#153243 Aug 5, 2012
Mona Lott wrote:
<quoted text>
...yawn...
The discussion was about choice, shit-for-brains. It supports being gay is NOT a choice. Geez.... you're such a moron.
Mona Lott.

That is not the question. The "normal" non-Homosexual man is expected to control his sexual appetite. The question is whether or not any less should be expected of our Homosexual friends and the lesbians?

Ronald
ARGUING with IDIOTS

Shasta Lake, CA

#153244 Aug 5, 2012
ELH wrote:
<quoted text>Most women probably wouldn't care and the christian fanatics can't because,as you know Jesus gave regularly secluded sermons on the evils of abortion (and pork ), and even though they love their ham they don't want to piss Jesus off by having an abortion. But I bet you would change your stance on abortion or at least make an exception in this case.
I made no mention of religion! Interesting that you immediately launch an attack on a specific religious group!
ARGUING with IDIOTS

Shasta Lake, CA

#153245 Aug 5, 2012
Marcia_Marcia_Marcia wrote:
<quoted text>Not Pro Abortionists it is Pro Choice and I think the question should be "If the sexual orientation of a fetus could be determined, would the argument "All babies should have a chance at life no matter what" still be supported by pro life?
Okay, that is fair. I asked my question, go ahead and ask yours.
ELH

Portland, OR

#153246 Aug 5, 2012
Ronald wrote:
<quoted text>
Mona Lott.
That is not the question. The "normal" non-Homosexual man is expected to control his sexual appetite. The question is whether or not any less should be expected of our Homosexual friends and the lesbians?
Ronald


Who aside from the "professor" and "this guy", the thread assholes or you ever said that homosexuals don't "control their sexual appetites"?

I won't even bother to ask WTF you comment has to do with Mona's post since your posts are always non responsive, but what do you base this OPINION of your on?
ELH

Portland, OR

#153247 Aug 5, 2012
ARGUING with IDIOTS wrote:
<quoted text>
I made no mention of religion! Interesting that you immediately launch an attack on a specific religious group!
I guess that in the future you need to outline the acceptable response parameters in you posts. Also, unclenching your rectal sphincter once in a while and relaxing enough to get a JOKE might be a good ideal too. As an added benefit, it will also reduce your blood pressure.
thisGuy

Killeen, TX

#153248 Aug 5, 2012
Mona Lott wrote:
<quoted text>
Silly fundies. Always asking for people to prove a negative.
The party making the claim is responsible for the burden of proof. Prove it IS a choice. Go ahead. Spit in the face of EVERY legitimate medical and psychological and scientific professional organization. Go ahead.
There is no consensus among scientists about the exact reasons that an individual develops a heterosexual, bisexual, gay, or lesbian orientation. Although much research has examined the possible genetic, hormonal, developmental, social, and cultural influences on sexual orientation, no findings have emerged that permit scientists to conclude that sexual orientation is determined by any particular factor or factors. Many think that nature and nurture both play complex roles; most people experience little or no sense of choice about their sexual orientation.
most people experience little or no sense of choice about their sexual orientation.
most people experience little or no sense of choice about their sexual orientation.
most people experience little or no sense of choice about their sexual orientation.

"Silly fundies."
-Idiots with no real arguments, scream "fundies"

"Prove it IS a choice."
-LOL Really? So 2 + 2 = 4 is a CHOICE now? I take it the Earth chose to be sphere too, since it's based on fact & not feelings...LOL You queers have very queer logic...ROFL

"The party making the claim is responsible for the burden of proof."
-CORRECTION: The party making the claim is responsible for the burden of TRUTH.

"There is no consensus among scientists about the exact reasons that an individual develops a heterosexual, bisexual, gay, or lesbian orientation."
-Ever wondered why? I know. It's because perverts are constantly changing their sexual orientation. It's pointless counting the # of queers in a city when some of them quit being queers.

"Spit in the face of EVERY legitimate medical and psychological and scientific professional organization. Go ahead."
-From what I read, the homosexual lifestyle decreases the lifespan of people to 30 yrs. And many are at higher risks at contacting AIDS & other STDs, & I got all this information from medical & psychological sites.

"Although much research has examined the possible genetic, hormonal, developmental, social, and cultural influences on sexual orientation, no findings have emerged that permit scientists to conclude that sexual orientation is determined by any particular factor or factors."
-LOL Really? So being raped, raised with a mother AND father, being abused by a partner doesn't make resort to homosexuality?---which by the way are all SOCIAL, HORMONAL, & DEVELOPMENTAL influences. What about Planned Parenthood talking to children about the ways queers have sex? And some of these kids are as young as 5 yrs old! Also why are queers pushing for lesbian acceptance, it seems to be something common among teenage girls? Speaking of teens, why are queers pushing their queer agenda onto girls? Sounds almost like homosexuality is a LEARNT behavior.

"Many think that nature and nurture both play complex roles"
-Because they DO, moron.

"most people experience little or no sense of choice about their sexual orientation."
-LOL So teaching teenagers (who btw are still in the process of finding their identities & places in life) about queerism doesn't or won't confuse them? LOL COOL STORY BRO. It clearly is a choice.

"most people experience little or no sense of choice about their sexual orientation."
-Many homosexuals who were raped & abused as children would disagree with you.
thisGuy

Killeen, TX

#153249 Aug 5, 2012
ELH wrote:
<quoted text>
Who aside from the "professor" and "this guy", the thread assholes or you ever said that homosexuals don't "control their sexual appetites"?
So [sexual] addictions/urges can't be controlled?
cool story bro. but I think people who quit smoking would disagree with you
Ronald

Long Beach, CA

#153250 Aug 5, 2012
ELH wrote:
<quoted text>
Who aside from the "professor" and "this guy", the thread assholes or you ever said that homosexuals don't "control their sexual appetites"?
I won't even bother to ask WTF you comment has to do with Mona's post since your posts are always non responsive, but what do you base this OPINION of your on?
ELH.

Yes. I agree. Before the corrupt politicians and the high paid agenda driven Government judges began pandering to the tiny Homosexual community - and the lesbians - our Homosexual friends had enough self-respect to keep their sexual proclivities "in the closet".*(so to speak)* In fact, in olden times I never even saw non-Homosexual parades.

Ronald

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#153251 Aug 5, 2012
Prof Marvel wrote:
Why Are You Still Supporting Gay Adoption?
Now that the APA has revised its opinion on sexual orientation -- to writ, they don't know for certain what causes it, why are you still supporting gay adoption?
See below the most recent APA revision. And I'll be the first to say, you can't be blamed for how the LGBT scammed you on the issue, but now that you know you've been scammed isn't it time to start thinking about the kids whose lives you put in danger?
Mind you, gays are probably no more prone to pedophilia than anyone else and it's a low and hateful thing to suggest otherwise. But isn't this a separate question? Isn't the primary issue here erring on the side of caution?
Basically, the APA has rejected all those lesbian-authored studies that held gay parents are just as good as straight parents. The APA opinion below clearly implies this.
If the APA gave the green light to gay adoption before they're now giving it a red light.
Why then are you still for gay adoption?
And finally, weren't you warned about this? Weren't you told you were acting in a foolish and irresponsible manner when you signed-on for gay adoption?
Weren't you told to curb your enthusiasm -- that your rush to be so got blam politically correct would come back to bite you on the ass?
<quoted text>
So on the link you provided you said they are giving the red light on gay adoption?
This is what The APA says "In summary, social science has shown that the concerns often raised about children of lesbian and gay parents—concerns that are generally grounded in prejudice against and stereotypes about gay people—are unfounded. Overall, the research indicates that the children of lesbian and gay parents do not differ markedly from the children of heterosexual parents in their development, adjustment, or overall well-being."

So The APA says concerns are unfounded and research indicates the children of lesbain or gay parents do not differ markedly from children of heterosexual.

So... where did you get the red light comment from?

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#153252 Aug 5, 2012
thisGuy wrote:
<quoted text>
"Silly fundies."
-Idiots with no real arguments, scream "fundies"
"Prove it IS a choice."
-LOL Really? So 2 + 2 = 4 is a CHOICE now? I take it the Earth chose to be sphere too, since it's based on fact & not feelings...LOL You queers have very queer logic...ROFL
"The party making the claim is responsible for the burden of proof."
-CORRECTION: The party making the claim is responsible for the burden of TRUTH.
"There is no consensus among scientists about the exact reasons that an individual develops a heterosexual, bisexual, gay, or lesbian orientation."
-Ever wondered why? I know. It's because perverts are constantly changing their sexual orientation. It's pointless counting the # of queers in a city when some of them quit being queers.
"Spit in the face of EVERY legitimate medical and psychological and scientific professional organization. Go ahead."
-From what I read, the homosexual lifestyle decreases the lifespan of people to 30 yrs. And many are at higher risks at contacting AIDS & other STDs, & I got all this information from medical & psychological sites.
"Although much research has examined the possible genetic, hormonal, developmental, social, and cultural influences on sexual orientation, no findings have emerged that permit scientists to conclude that sexual orientation is determined by any particular factor or factors."
-LOL Really? So being raped, raised with a mother AND father, being abused by a partner doesn't make resort to homosexuality?---which by the way are all SOCIAL, HORMONAL, & DEVELOPMENTAL influences. What about Planned Parenthood talking to children about the ways queers have sex? And some of these kids are as young as 5 yrs old! Also why are queers pushing for lesbian acceptance, it seems to be something common among teenage girls? Speaking of teens, why are queers pushing their queer agenda onto girls? Sounds almost like homosexuality is a LEARNT behavior.
"Many think that nature and nurture both play complex roles"
-Because they DO, moron.
"most people experience little or no sense of choice about their sexual orientation."
-LOL So teaching teenagers (who btw are still in the process of finding their identities & places in life) about queerism doesn't or won't confuse them? LOL COOL STORY BRO. It clearly is a choice.
"most people experience little or no sense of choice about their sexual orientation."

-Many homosexuals who were raped & abused as children would disagree with you.
So why is it people need proof that it is a choice in order to believe it is or isnt?
But when someone asks for proof of God or Jesus and they can not produce it they say it is Faith and you do not need proof?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

North-Hollywood Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Pit Bull Rescue Tia Torres husband ex-convict a... (Oct '07) 2 hr muppykitty 507
News Welch: Modeling agents hated my body (Apr '10) 3 hr CactusSue 5
Review: Sepulveda Motel 8 hr dianne 1
News People confirms Bruce Jenner 'transitioning int... 10 hr ChopChop4321 35
Confessions of a "disabled" disabled pandhandler 10 hr Heavy Fed 3
Crystal Eve Potter Wheeler - Governor Brown's S... 11 hr Burnedbyacontoo 3
News The 25 Most Dangerous Cities in the U.S. Are Mo... (Nov '10) 12 hr laop 19,738

Beach Hazards Statement for Los Angeles County was issued at April 01 at 5:12AM PDT

North-Hollywood Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

North-Hollywood People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]