|
rights 4 zoophiles 2
Chicago, IL
|
Bill Of Rights 69 wrote: <quoted text> As usual,what a human piece of shyte says! You are no better than the next person gay or straight! Didn't you hear that cock roach curfew bell ring awhile ago? It's time for all human cock roaches like yourself to crawl back under that favorite rock of your along with the rest of the and cock roaches! Excuse me if I treat and judge people by the quality of their character and not their sexual orientation! And by that test you fail miserably! take your HIV pills pervert . Many homosexual perverts posted here were threatening to actually poison food at Chick-o just to make their point across . I mean poisoning innocent people food . Now they planning to kiss-in which pretty much means good ole folks won't be able to take their kids to chick-o in fear of exposing them to those sick perverted fcks
|
|
“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”
Since: Nov 10
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
The Puppet Master wrote: <quoted text> Irrelevant oh great ignorant one! LOL,Procreation is NOT nor has it ever been a requirement of marriage! Next! Besides,one2 words,artificial insemination! Or for you turkey baster! And there are cases where a man has died and the wife had his sperm removed and saved for a later date when she wanted to get pregnant! Are all you Texans this stupid? Sure seems that way! Now get on topic or as Bruno says in every post,STFU!!! Talk about a irrelevant statement! Why would you need to make procreation a 'requirement' when it naturally occurs in 96% of marriages??? This is clear; all you gays ARE that stupid! Smirk.
|
|
“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”
Since: Nov 10
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
akpilot wrote: <quoted text> Perhaps not, but the court certainly has made it a point each and every time they referenced marriage as a "right". "We are dealing here with legislation which involves one of the basic civil rights of man. Marriage and procreation are fundamental to the very existence and survival of the race."- Skinner v Oklahoma "Marriage is one of the "basic civil rights of man," fundamental to our very existence and survival. Skinner v. Oklahoma, 316 U.S. 535, 541 (1942). "- Loving v Virginia "Our Court has not recognized a fundamental right to marry that departs in any respect from the right defined by the US Supreme Court in cases like Skinner which acknowledged that marriage is "fundamental to the very existence and survival of the [human] race" because it is the primary institution supporting procreation and child-rearing (316 US at 541; see also Zablocki, 434 US 374; Griswold, 381 US 479). The binary nature of marriage—its inclusion of one woman and one man—reflects the biological fact that human procreation cannot be accomplished without the genetic contribution of both a male and a female. Marriage creates a supportive environment for procreation to occur and the resulting offspring to be nurtured. Although plaintiffs suggest that the connection between procreation and marriage has become anachronistic because of scientific advances in assisted reproduction technology, the fact remains that the vast majority of children are conceived naturally through sexual contact between a woman and a man."- Hernandez v Robels "It is an institution in the maintenance of which in its purity the public is deeply interested, for it is the foundation of the family and of society, without which there would be neither civilization nor progress. "- Maynard v Hill Great post! Thank you!!!
|
|
“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”
Since: Nov 10
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
ELH wrote: <quoted text> You wish. The results are in and the survey says that my post was 87% more interesting and 92% more factual that yours. <quoted text> No shit? Did you learn that in remedial biology or did you read it in one of professor Marvelous's posts? <quoted text> I guess my original post was to complicated! OK, Let me break it down for you...YOU can't get laid by ANYTHING alive much less an actual woman you will never reproduce. Is that clearer? You are consistent in your solely ad homoan responses with a clear masculine tone. Clearly a genetic defect on so many levels. Smirk.
|
|
“The Great and Wonderful Marvel”
Since: Aug 09
Atlanta, GA
|
Please wait...
ELH wrote: <quoted text> I have a better idea! Let's assume that no one give a crap about your idiotic theories and their equality nutty conclusions and you just STFU already? What I want to know is why your mother didn't abort you when she had the chance. If only she knew what you'd become..well thankfully you'll never reproduce. "Nutty" conclusions, ELH? Can you honestly think of anything nuttier than marching down Main Street in a penis suit? What ...?
|
|
Reality
Madison, WI
|
Prof Marvel wrote: NOTICE: To all who watched the LGBT Kiss-In at Chick-Fil-A... If you were shocked and repulsed at the sight of the men and women kissing each other in front of you local Chik-Fil-A yesterday, not to worry ... The LGBT assures us the spectacle will in no way, size, shape, or form negatively affect your kids. How does the LGBT use to determine such weighty questions? They call it "Gaydar." If watching gay people made you gay, then why aren't you wearing a speedo , penis hat and, singing " Its raining Men" . You spend most of your day searching for gay photos. If anyone where to catch the Gay, it would be you.
|
|
“What Goes Around, Comes Around”
Since: Mar 07
Kansas City, MO.
|
Please wait...
rights 4 zoophiles 2 wrote: <quoted text>take your HIV pills pervert . Many homosexual perverts posted here were threatening to actually poison food at Chick-o just to make their point across . I mean poisoning innocent people food . Now they planning to kiss-in which pretty much means good ole folks won't be able to take their kids to chick-o in fear of exposing them to those sick perverted fcks buy your name....did you get your rabies shots for the year?
|
|
“The Great and Wonderful Marvel”
Since: Aug 09
Atlanta, GA
|
Please wait...
Let's see how many straight morons who support same-sex marriage still believe homosexuality is caused by genes? Now let's see one cite that supports your LGBT claptrap. The APA certainly doesn't support that pile of crap anymore. Here's their latest cop out: What causes a person to have a particular sexual orientation? There is no consensus among scientists about the exact reasons that an individual develops a heterosexual, bisexual, gay, or lesbian orientation. Although much research has examined the possible genetic, hormonal, developmental, social, and cultural influences on sexual orientation, no findings have emerged that permit scientists to conclude that sexual orientation is determined by any particular factor or factors. Many think that nature and nurture both play complex roles; most people experience little or no sense of choice about their sexual orientation. http://www.apa.org/helpcenter/sexual-orientat... Got that? Let me help you with it: what they're saying is they just don't know what causes sexual orientation. But what they're really saying is "things have got out of hand!-- Time to cover our asses! The LGBT has gone hog wild with our original "born that way" comment and we don't want everybody blaming us if a whole generation grows up queer." That's right. The APA is running scared. Even the gays inside the APA are running scared. Even they never thought the LGBT would use their comment to force school boards to hire drag queen teachers. Time to jump ship, Mr Straight Moron who Supports Same-Sex Marriage? Yeah, I'd say so. Extra credit question: How'd you like that Kiss-in at the local Chik-Fil-A, fella? American democracy in action, wasn't it? Take your kids to see it, you stupid b*stard?
|
|
|
|
Reality
Madison, WI
|
Prof Marvel wrote: Let's see how many straight morons who support same-sex marriage still believe homosexuality is caused by genes? Now let's see one cite that supports your LGBT claptrap. The APA certainly doesn't support that pile of crap anymore. Here's their latest cop out: <quoted text> Got that? Let me help you with it: what they're saying is they just don't know what causes sexual orientation. But what they're really saying is "things have got out of hand!-- Time to cover our asses! The LGBT has gone hog wild with our original "born that way" comment and we don't want everybody blaming us if a whole generation grows up queer." That's right. The APA is running scared. Even the gays inside the APA are running scared. Even they never thought the LGBT would use their comment to force school boards to hire drag queen teachers. Time to jump ship, Mr Straight Moron who Supports Same-Sex Marriage? Yeah, I'd say so. Extra credit question: How'd you like that Kiss-in at the local Chik-Fil-A, fella? American democracy in action, wasn't it? Take your kids to see it, you stupid b*stard? If watching gay people made you gay, then why aren't you wearing a speedo , penis hat and, singing " Its raining Men" . You spend most of your day searching for gay photos. If anyone where to catch the Gay, it would be you.
|
|
“The Great and Wonderful Marvel”
Since: Aug 09
Atlanta, GA
|
Please wait...
Reality wrote: <quoted text>If watching gay people made you gay, then why aren't you wearing a speedo , penis hat and, singing " Its raining Men" . You spend most of your day searching for gay photos. If anyone where to catch the Gay, it would be you. Another brilliant gay debater. His best take down -- he accuses his opponent of being gay. Master stroke, that, fella.
|
|
Winston Smith
Steubenville, OH
|
RiccardoFire wrote: <quoted text>Why are you comparing the Klan to the Nazi's? you flaming idiot. "with people of your ilk" Who are my people? I didn't know I belonged in a group. What's funny is when someone doesn't agree with you fools, they are called haters or bigots or kkk or nazi's. Actually the Nazi's are more in line with obama and his robin hood philosophy. Look hampster brain, the Klan and the Nazi party seem to have a lot in common with you. Both seem to think they're superior to all others fer instance. You belong in a group home for the mentally inept. You do hate people that are different from you. That shines through with your each of your intellectually challenged comments.
|
|
Winston Smith
Steubenville, OH
|
Ooops! Mangled engleesh alert ^^^ but you get the point Riccardope.
|
|
Winston Smith
Steubenville, OH
|
Prof Marvel wrote: <quoted text> Another brilliant gay debater. His best take down -- he accuses his opponent of being gay. Master stroke, that, fella. But you are gay! And like your APA quote says, you "experience little or no sense of choice about their sexual orientation..." Enjoy your closet, twinky.
|
|
Since: Dec 08
San Francisco, CA
|
Please wait...
Marriage Equality and their supporters keep growing everywhere and there isn't anything the bigots can do to stop it, thank the good lord!
|
|
Reality
Madison, WI
|
Prof Marvel wrote: <quoted text> Another brilliant gay debater. His best take down -- he accuses his opponent of being gay. Master stroke, that, fella. Hey sport, you are the one who keeps insisting that being around homosexuals, or being influenced by homosexuals or being taught that homosexuality is OK will cause a person to become a homosexual. That being said with the inordinate amount of time you spend looking at pictures of homosexuals, reading about bath houses, ogling over photos of homosexuals and dreaming of anal sex with a man. You should be a homosexual. In fact you sir should be the poster man for the LGBT community. Damn boy homosexuals don't think about being homosexual near as much as you do.
|
|
Since: Dec 08
San Francisco, CA
|
Please wait...
Winston Smith wrote: Ooops! Mangled engleesh alert ^^^ but you get the point Riccardope. have you been so hate filled your entire life or is this a relatively new phenomena for you?
|
|
Since: Dec 08
San Francisco, CA
|
Please wait...
Winston Smith wrote: <quoted text> But you are gay! And like your APA quote says, you "experience little or no sense of choice about their sexual orientation..." Enjoy your closet, twinky. enjoy your hate butthole!
|
|
Since: Dec 08
San Francisco, CA
|
Please wait...
Prof Marvel wrote: <quoted text> Another brilliant gay debater. His best take down -- he accuses his opponent of being gay. Master stroke, that, fella. opponent, you? You're just a useless washed up hater who has nothing better to do with your life than to spread your ignorance! PS, you are gay, so gay you can't even leave this thread in years!!!
|
|
Bruno
Lomita, CA
|
Marcia_Marcia_Marcia wrote: <quoted text> Yes they can in.... *Connecticut *Distric of Columbia *Iowa *Massachusetts *New Hampshire *New York *Vermont and more to come! Rose the Ho says "NO" ... who's the liar here?????
|
|
Bruno
Lomita, CA
|
Marcia_Marcia_Marcia wrote: <quoted text> but only in a few states and if I move to get married and then have to move back to Texas for job or family my marriage will not be recognized there. So yes you can get married it is just not recognized by all 50 states yet I agree, but the Ho made the blanket statement that "woman can NOT marry Woman" the Ho did not specify any state, he/she will deny this but it's been written by the HO. It's been known that in this topex forum, the homos change words around to suit themselves alot ... this is not Bruger King
|
|
Tell me when this thread is updated:
(Registration is not required)
Add to my Tracker
Send me an email
|