$1.68 million in pot seized in raids

The "war on drugs" is a joke!
LEGALIZE the stuff and the profits will dry up real fast, PLEASE!!

Yeah legalize it and have a bunch of losers living next door to you on government support.

1.68 million is that right ? So thats the number the cops are going to run by the DA in their report for finding a few plants. They "always" inflate and exagerate the "street value" of the pot they sieze. I think they do that so the'll get more funding from the Feds for their war on drugs. Its total BS. Meanwhile some poor non- violent person with little or no police record does hard time. Now thats a crime. And thats why our prisons are full of non-violent offenders,
that we tax payers have to foot the bill for.
And believe me after a fer years in the joint,
these "non-violent" offenders are not non violent any longer. They hold a grudge, and rightfully so.

nomore wrote:

Yeah legalize it and have a bunch of losers living next door to you on government support.

Your comment doesn't hold any crediability in it. So it seems to be YOUR OPINION that everyone who smokes is a "loser" as used by you?? I happen to have a "professional" job in state goverment and have even recieved "employee of the year" and monthly awards...and I'm a loser.
If this is what we are, I welcome all of these "losers" in my neighborhood, and I live in La Jolla, California...where alot of other "losers" happen to live.
Next time you want to post a comment think about it or reread what you wrote, then you wouldn't post a bunch of nonsense.

Van wrote:

The "war on drugs" is a joke!
LEGALIZE the stuff and the profits will dry up real fast, PLEASE!!

AGREED!

nomore wrote:

Yeah legalize it and have a bunch of losers living next door to you on government support.

While you're worrying about gov. spending you might take a look at this thing called the war on drugs.

Costs about 50 billion a year.

Prefer hairless wrote:

<quoted text>Your comment doesn't hold any crediability in it. So it seems to be YOUR OPINION that everyone who smokes is a "loser" as used by you?? I happen to have a "professional" job in state goverment and have even recieved "employee of the year" and monthly awards...and I'm a loser.
If this is what we are, I welcome all of these "losers" in my neighborhood, and I live in La Jolla, California...where alot of other "losers" happen to live.
Next time you want to post a comment think about it or reread what you wrote, then you wouldn't post a bunch of nonsense.

Yes you are a loser and I bet your afaid of drug tests or getting hurt on the job big fat loser.

Prefer hairless wrote:

<quoted text>Your comment doesn't hold any crediability in it. So it seems to be YOUR OPINION that everyone who smokes is a "loser" as used by you?? I happen to have a "professional" job in state goverment and have even recieved "employee of the year" and monthly awards...and I'm a loser.
If this is what we are, I welcome all of these "losers" in my neighborhood, and I live in La Jolla, California...where alot of other "losers" happen to live.
Next time you want to post a comment think about it or reread what you wrote, then you wouldn't post a bunch of nonsense.

Oh and by the way go smoke in front of your boss hmmm I didn't think so.

Charles Dean wrote:

<quoted text>
While you're worrying about gov. spending you might take a look at this thing called the war on drugs.
Costs about 50 billion a year.

Oh well

Charles Dean wrote:

<quoted text>
While you're worrying about gov. spending you might take a look at this thing called the war on drugs.
Costs about 50 billion a year.

How much do you think the Gov. pays a year for drug addicts who abuse the system.

char wrote:

<quoted text>How much do you think the Gov. pays a year for drug addicts who abuse the system.

Pot? Get real. Booze costs the gov. far more; there really is no comparison.

You'd be amazed about the type of people in all walks of life who smoke dope and will continue to do so whether it's legal or not.
Save those tax dollars for some real issues.

nomore wrote:

Yeah legalize it and have a bunch of losers living next door to you on government support.

so what the small percentage of dope smokers who can hold down a job is small compared to the percent that can't.

So, what's your solution here (Keep the status quo if, of course, you have a vested interest)?
Our precious tax dollars are at work in this "war on drugs", which is NOT putting a dent in it.

char wrote:

so what the small percentage of dope smokers who can hold down a job is small compared to the percent that can't.

Well first maybe they should drug test welfare recipients that's wasted tax payers money when they use it on drugs and not on their kids and also don't give support checks to people who messed up their health from drug abuse do you know how much tax payers money goes to people who "can't" work they should drug test them once a week.

char wrote:

<quoted text>How much do you think the Gov. pays a year for drug addicts who abuse the system.

We are talking about weed, subsequently the term 'drug addict' is irrelevant. And just so you know its no where near 50 billion a year.

Prefer hairless wrote:

<quoted text>Your comment doesn't hold any crediability in it. So it seems to be YOUR OPINION that everyone who smokes is a "loser" as used by you?? I happen to have a "professional" job in state goverment and have even recieved "employee of the year" and monthly awards...and I'm a loser.
If this is what we are, I welcome all of these "losers" in my neighborhood, and I live in La Jolla, California...where alot of other "losers" happen to live.
Next time you want to post a comment think about it or reread what you wrote, then you wouldn't post a bunch of nonsense.

you sound rediculous... fighting for a cause that dumbs down the future. loser never become anything and smoking weed makes you a loser and im from Corona California. varrio crown baybay

Burbujas wrote:

<quoted text>
you sound rediculous... fighting for a cause that dumbs down the future. loser never become anything and smoking weed makes you a loser and im from Corona California. varrio crown baybay

You're argument would hold more water if you used yourself as an example of weed use.

char wrote:

Well first maybe they should drug test welfare recipients that's wasted tax payers money when they use it on drugs and not on their kids and also don't give support checks to people who messed up their health from drug abuse do you know how much tax payers money goes to people who "can't" work they should drug test them once a week.

I agree with you 110% and pull all the illegals off the welfare system so they cant buy anymore, and stop paying for these f&^%#%s anymore FREE money, and stop wasting tax dollars pulling the weed off the streets, legalize it like booz and save the cash.

Prefer hairless wrote:

<quoted text>Your comment doesn't hold any crediability in it. So it seems to be YOUR OPINION that everyone who smokes is a "loser" as used by you?? I happen to have a "professional" job in state goverment and have even recieved "employee of the year" and monthly awards...and I'm a loser.
If this is what we are, I welcome all of these "losers" in my neighborhood, and I live in La Jolla, California...where alot of other "losers" happen to live.
Next time you want to post a comment think about it or reread what you wrote, then you wouldn't post a bunch of nonsense.

I am confused by your comment, what are you saying?