Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Rose_NoHo wrote:

<quoted text>
That's a lie.
If a woman goes into the JP and ask to marry a woman, she'll be told "No", if a man does, he'll be told "Yes".
No != Yes

You fail the logic test. Sorry Rose.

If a person goes to the JP and asks to marry someone of the opposite sex they will be told- YES

If a person goes to the JP and asks to marry someone of the same sex they will be told- NO

It doesn't matter if you are a man or a woman, the law treats you the same.

If you have trouble understanding this, the court explained it to you- hernandez v robels.

You post make about as much this does:

ELH wrote:

<quoted text>
Outspoken? Is that what they are calling it now? You post make about as much this does:
http://www.youtube.com/watch...

Smirk.

ELH wrote:

<quoted text>
So I would imagine that your 'wife' is very flexible or very very curious. Or does she have some sort of fetish?

The slut lesbian and I each have a eye. My wife makes me cover the lesbian's when we make love.

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
I did ask my wife. I even asked her to help me visualize it! She said, "Nice try, and nothing fits."
As you have discovered, I am pretty outspoken. However, the point is not broadcasting crude behavior, it is trying to pass harmful, unhealthy and demeaning behavior as normal or nice. Especially in the context of marriage. Not to mention the fact that the inability to express evolutionary intercourse exposes a genetic handicap.

RnL2008 wrote:

<quoted text>
You really aren't this stupid, are ya? We don't prevent heterosexuals from marrying no matter how much healthy or harmful sex they have! We don't prevent heterosexuals from marrying a person they just met......YET, you find that it's okay to do so with regards to Gays and Lesbians......and that's simply wrong!!!
How do you know what we are incapable of doing? Oh and if it's that procreation issue again......we don't prevent heterosexuals from marrying who don't want kids or can't have kids!!!

Can't respond to one point of my post. Instead you mount a ad homoan attack and change subject.

So you are demanding that marriage include harmful sex, dumbant genders and strangers, while removing the ponderous propensity of children?

No.

ELH wrote:

<quoted text>
If your posts tonight are any indication you and your "wife" have sex one a month with the doors locked the lights off. You hike up her flannel nightie and pull your nickers down around your knees then spend two minutes huffing and puffing on top of her while she lays still and does her "duty".
This is the only explanation I can come up with that explains why you are confusing electric outlets and cords with HUMAN genitals AND why you are not aware that sexually healthy adults have sex naked and in a variety of positions.
Might I suggest you go on AMAZON and find some books? After all your "wife" deserves to experience at least one (non masturbation) orgasm in her lifetime.

Is that ad homoan attack suppose to be your effort to 'help' RN???

I'm simply asking how lesbians 'fit' together. Why can you so easily imagine a fictional example of heterosexual sex, and be so confounded about answering a simple question about lesbian sex???

Just a heads up; Lesbians can only practice masturbation. Only evolutionary intercourse can qualify as a distinction.

Calm down, you always sound like a hissy fit. That's not very likable!

Rose_NoHo wrote:

<quoted text>
Then why do lesbians have the lowest STD rates?
<quoted text>

Because NOTHING 'fits' silly!

Rose_NoHo wrote:

<quoted text>
They aren't "made" for anything, they just exist. And we can use them as we see fit. Want to suck a booger out of a lover's nose? Go for it.
Why not whisper into their ear? That's sexy.

A ear and nose are not 'made' for "anything"???

Then why "whisper" in a ear?

Blonde.

Smirk.

Rose_NoHo wrote:

<quoted text>
Yes. Intelligence.

This from a blonde ho.

Then why don't you have the simple intelligence to explain what fits?

Smirk.

Jeremiah Johnson wrote:

<quoted text>
Well since you have both parts as YOU stated,might I suggest you go and F yourself and find out? I mean your up in everybody's business any way so why the hell not! LOL,Sounds like you like to watch? Are you a voyeur by chance? Do you like to peek in or hide in a closet and watch to get your rocks off?

Ad homoan attack.

Just a heads up (since you are missing one, or likely two...), the question wasn't about evolutionary intercourse, it was about what 'fits' in lesbian sex.

Smirk.

KiMare wrote:

<quoted text>
Ad homoan attack.
Just a heads up (since you are missing one, or likely two...), the question wasn't about evolutionary intercourse, it was about what 'fits' in lesbian sex.
Smirk.

No,the question is....."Judge overturns California's ban on same sex marriage"!!! Glad I could help you psychotic nut job! And NOT how people have sex or what 2 consenting adults do in the privacy of their own home!

akpilot wrote:

<quoted text>
Why would I care? As long as he is a man and treats her right. But I doubt a gay man would be interested.

Thank you. We're not interested in marrying someone of the opposite sex. That's why we are petitioning the Court. Unless someone can come up with a rational reason to forbid it, the Court will grant it to us and all you homophobes can suck it.

akpilot wrote:

<quoted text>
You fail the logic test. Sorry Rose.
If a person goes to the JP and asks to marry someone of the opposite sex they will be told- YES
If a person goes to the JP and asks to marry someone of the same sex they will be told- NO
It doesn't matter if you are a man or a woman, the law treats you the same.
If you have trouble understanding this, the court explained it to you- hernandez v robels.

How did that work out in New York? The legislature CORRECTED the problem.

RnL2008 wrote:

<quoted text>
Rose from North Hollywood is speaking specifically about California at this moment in time......she knows I'm married and supports the right of Gays and Lesbians to marry here in California and in other states as well.
And what she is saying is true......a woman can not marry another woman here in California by a Justice of the Peace........but it won't be to long before that changes here in California.

Yep, next year! The fundies will be pissed! Guess they should have paid attention in civics class, and now, because they didn't, they will be publicly embarrassed by SCOTUS.

California should take its own Supreme Court's advice and take another look at the voter initiative process.

Jeremiah Johnson wrote:

<quoted text>
Rose TH is one of the 18,000 plus couples that were legally married before Prop 8 passed but as of right now it is STILL illegal for a women to marry a women in California so how about you STFU moron! You're wrong again as usual! D-u-h!!! LOL

LMAO Rose who?????? more gay humor too funny, you just had to stick you worthless two cents in didn't you ha ha haha

ELH wrote:

<quoted text>
If you boycott anything that Brian supports then you are a socialist who hates freedom. However, if you support anything that Brian is against then you are also a socialist who hates freedom.
Understand now?

Boycott Wal-Mart's Gay Agenda - Page 26

http://www.google.com/url...

Target Selling Pride Shirts to Help Pro-Gay Marriage Group — and ...
http://www.google.com/url...

JCPenney unveils Father's Day Ad featuring two gay fathers ...

http://www.google.com/url...

Is it ok for straight people to boycott Wal-Mart, JC Penny and Target? Just wondering how far his hypocrisy goes?

RnL2008 wrote:

<quoted text>
Rose from North Hollywood is speaking specifically about California at this moment in time......she knows I'm married and supports the right of Gays and Lesbians to marry here in California and in other states as well.
And what she is saying is true......a woman can not marry another woman here in California by a Justice of the Peace........but it won't be to long before that changes here in California.

I love how you dummies have each others backs. That is not how this argument started he/she was mouthing off as usual and did not specify, he/she clearly stated the facts, but you are too afraid to read it for youserlf. what ever you prove me right again. Your cult amazes me each day. lol more gay humor

goooooo morning

Hasn't changed yet.

Bruno wrote:

goooooo morning

Right back at you Mr Penguin.

Brian_G wrote:

<quoted text>Let's check the facts, can you name any widespread anti-gay boycott? Since the days of Anita Bryant, all the boycotts have been on the side of the Left.

Have you not been paying attention to the supposed Million Mom's boycotts over JCPenny, Kraft and anything or any other company that supports the rights of Gays and Lesbians?

You really should learn to pay attention in life!!!

Bruno wrote:

<quoted text>
LMAO Rose who?????? more gay humor too funny, you just had to stick you worthless two cents in didn't you ha ha haha

Must you always be this stupid?