Who do you support for Governor in Pennsylvania in 2010?

The right wing poling from rasmussen had the flipper romney up by 5 and now the flipper is only up by 2. The flipper is losing ground fast, huh tea baggers? That would explain why flipper is attempting to con the latino voters but flipper is learning only the racist moronic tea baggers can be conned so easily.the latino voting block is more powerful then the racist tea baggers and now they angry and thats what i want. Take that failed anger to your local voting booth and watch it fail just like it failed in 08 but this time walk and say were losing our country

Dan the Man wrote:

<quoted text>
LOL! Good ole Johnstown - never changes. Still using that tired old plagiarism charge against liberals while overlooking conservatives who ACTUALLY plagiarize.
Pitiful partisan attack dog loser. LMAO!

Only an ethics starved, morally bankrupt person refers to stealing the words of another as "that tired old plagiarism charge".

danny BOY, the frequent and proven plagiarist, once again fails to condemn plagiarism. No surprise there.

Who but you defends West Mifflin's plagiarism, danny BOY? You and that slobbering fool have SO much in common. He lies. You lie. He plagiarizes. You plagiarize. He posts half a dozen stolen articles in a single day. You defend it.

West Mifflin, bobby64 and danny BOY. Just how many psychopathic personalities do you channel on here, danny BOY?

danny BOY, the psychopathic plagiarizing pathological liar.

Bobby64 says thanks for giving me the dan the man upgrade.when are your tired worn out ass going to start promoting your flipper? It dont matter as flipper will never be president but your hate and ignorance turns on other racist tea bagger so dont stop as they need you.

BREAKING: Obama administration got almost everything it wanted in the Arizona vs US Supreme Court case...

----------

The court backed a section of the Arizona state law that calls for police to check the immigration status of people they stop.

That section was one of four at issue before the high court. The others make it a crime for immigrants without work permits to seek employment; make it a crime for immigrants to fail to carry registration documents, and authorize the police to arrest any immigrant they believe has committed a deportable offense.

Those other three provisions were struck down.

----------

The Court's guidance on how police can check immigration status when they stop people is very narrow in order to protect the rights of citizens.

So while the provision itself is upheld, the future implementation of it will be severely restricted - a win for opponents of Arizona's assault on individual freedom of citizens and legal residents.

Read more here:

Supreme Court strikes down most SB 1070 provisions
http://www.tucsonsentinel.com/local/report/06...

bobby64ji wrote:

The right wing poling from rasmussen had the flipper romney up by 5 and now the flipper is only up by 2. The flipper is losing ground fast, huh tea baggers? That would explain why flipper is attempting to con the latino voters but flipper is learning only the racist moronic tea baggers can be conned so easily.the latino voting block is more powerful then the racist tea baggers and now they angry and thats what i want. Take that failed anger to your local voting booth and watch it fail just like it failed in 08 but this time walk and say were losing our country

.........

There's only one poll I give a shit about , and that's NOV 7 2012

I'll Be a One-Term President If I Don't Fix This Economy In Three Years;

I Will Be Held "Accountable"

Ted wrote:

<quoted text>
Only an ethics starved, morally bankrupt person refers to stealing the words of another as "that tired old plagiarism charge".
danny BOY, the frequent and proven plagiarist, once again fails to condemn plagiarism. No surprise there.
Who but you defends West Mifflin's plagiarism, danny BOY? You and that slobbering fool have SO much in common. He lies. You lie. He plagiarizes. You plagiarize. He posts half a dozen stolen articles in a single day. You defend it.
West Mifflin, bobby64 and danny BOY. Just how many psychopathic personalities do you channel on here, danny BOY?
danny BOY, the psychopathic plagiarizing pathological liar.

Not a word about Taxnomore.

Big surprise.

Hack. LMAO!

Really, your a bleeping liar tea bagger warrior for the racist tea bagger club. The american voter dont favor you tea baggers now that they see ignorance and racism coming from the tea bagger club. Poling that tells the tea baggers to go f..k themselves must be so upsetting

Dan the Man wrote:

<quoted text>
Not a word about Taxnomore.
Big surprise.
Hack. LMAO!

**********

Would your Marxist leader renege on a deal he made the American people?

I'll be a One-Term President If I Don't Fix This Economy In Three Years;

I Will Be Held "Accountable"

..........

c'mon danny boy debate

SCUM-bagger

bobby64ji wrote:

The right wing poling from rasmussen had the flipper romney up by 5 and now the flipper is only up by 2. The flipper is losing ground fast, huh tea baggers? That would explain why flipper is attempting to con the latino voters but flipper is learning only the racist moronic tea baggers can be conned so easily.the latino voting block is more powerful then the racist tea baggers and now they angry and thats what i want. Take that failed anger to your local voting booth and watch it fail just like it failed in 08 but this time walk and say were losing our country

did u take your meds today? liberalism is a disease, as you all can tell booby64 is in a full blown liberal moonbat mental seizure,note all the names booby is spewing soo sad,:-)

Cletus, you learn those big words at the last racist tea bagger rally? You need to run from the rommey the proven flipper record as you cant defend it. A white moron who dont got big enough balls to defend a white man is cowardice. Tell me more about your feelings

US-2012 President: 50% Obama (D), 46% Romney (R)(Pew 6/7-6/17)
US-2012 President: 47% Obama (D), 44% Romney (R)(AP-GfK 6/14-18)
US-2012 President: 53% Obama (D), 40% Romney (R)(Bloomberg 6/15-18)
US-2012 President: 49% Obama (D), 45% Romney (PPP/Daily Kos/SEIU 6/14-17)

bobby64ji wrote:

Cletus, you learn those big words at the last racist tea bagger rally? You need to run from the rommey the proven flipper record as you cant defend it. A white moron who dont got big enough balls to defend a white man is cowardice. Tell me more about your feelings

is that all u got booby? lets talk about lies, you know all the lies your idol obamba tells, so if mitt was a black morman would that make u feel better?

Those facts must be upsetting for the tea baggers, huh tea baggers now repeat the racist tea baggers are losing the country so now get madder. Get madder morons

Dan the Man wrote:

BREAKING: Obama administration got almost everything it wanted in the Arizona vs US Supreme Court case...
----------
The court backed a section of the Arizona state law that calls for police to check the immigration status of people they stop.
That section was one of four at issue before the high court. The others make it a crime for immigrants without work permits to seek employment; make it a crime for immigrants to fail to carry registration documents, and authorize the police to arrest any immigrant they believe has committed a deportable offense.
Those other three provisions were struck down.
----------
The Court's guidance on how police can check immigration status when they stop people is very narrow in order to protect the rights of citizens.
So while the provision itself is upheld, the future implementation of it will be severely restricted - a win for opponents of Arizona's assault on individual freedom of citizens and legal residents.

Your comments are at odds with the ruling in saying that the "Obama administration got almost everything it wanted in the Arizona vs US Supreme Court case" and "The Court's guidance on how police can check immigration status when they stop people is very narrow in order to protect the rights of citizens" and "So while the provision itself is upheld, the future implementation of it will be severely restricted - a win for opponents of Arizona's assault on individual freedom of citizens and legal residents."

That's all predictable dannyBOYspin trying to save some face in an embarrassing loss for Obama. Poor danny BOY.

The ruling isn't at all narrow, danny BOY. The three sections struck down were relatively minor compared to the section upheld by the Supreme Court as constitutional.

According to the Wall Street Journal "The court backed a section of the Arizona state law that calls for police to check the immigration status of people they stop." That was the backbone of the Arizona law, the one the Supreme Court upheld as constitutional.

In plain language, danny BOY, the police are permitted to check the legal immigration status of people they stop. It's a huge legal precedent that clears the way for other states to legislate similar laws.

But you see that as a great Obama victory, do you, danny BOY? Great! It's encouraging that you agree that illegal immigrants pose a huge problem for the nation and you support constitutional law directed at stemming that unwelcome flood.

cletus wrote:

<quoted text> is that all u got booby? lets talk about lies, you know all the lies your idol obamba tells, so if mitt was a black morman would that make u feel better?

ARE there any black Mormons? LOL!

The Mormon church was aggressively racist for the first 150 years of its existence with a formal policy forbidding black men from serving in leadership.

Come to think of it - are YOU Mormon, Cletus the K-D M-B Racist?

Cletus, any thing is better than defending your flupper now isnt it? You cant promote the flipper and on election day the american voter will tell you why the romney wasnt elected president. You need to upgrade your right wing racist tea bagger talking points as the one you have been babbling about only provides entertainment for your racist tea bagger club. Your yellow spine is glowing

Dan the Man wrote:

<quoted text>
Not a word about Taxnomore.
Big surprise.
Hack. LMAO!

Gee, danny BOY, if YOU discover someone is plagiarizing it's YOUR duty to point it out.

But given that YOU are a proven and frequent plagiarist it's no surprise you don't.

Your ethical failure to point out someone's plagiarism isn't on my shoulders, danny BOY. That's on you. LMAO!

A good summary of the SCOTUS decision on Arizona's SB1070...

----------

The Ninth Circuit ordered Arizona not to implement four parts of the statute while the case was litigated. Arizona asked the Supreme Court to review that decision, which it did, resulting in today’s decision.

Here is a rundown on the Court’s ruling with respect to each relevant challenge:

1. Police Checks.
Section 2(B) of the law requires the police to check the immigration status of persons whom they detain before releasing them. It also allows the police to stop and detain anyone suspected of being an undocumented immigrant. The Court held that the lower courts were wrong to prevent this provision from going into effect while its lawfulness is being litigated. It was not sufficiently clear that the provision would be held preempted, the Court held.

The Court took pains to point out that the law, on its face, prohibits stops based on race or national origin and provides that the stops must be conducted consistent with federal immigration and civil rights laws. However, it held open that the provision could eventually be invalidated after trial.

2. State Law Crime of Being In The Country Illegally.
Although federal law already makes it illegal for someone to be in the country without proper authorization, Section 3 of the Arizona statute also makes it a state crime, subject to additional fines and possible imprisonment. The Court held that this provision was preempted and cannot be enforced. The Court held that Congress has left no room for states to regulate in this field, even to implement the federal prohibition.

3. Ban on Working In The State.
Section 5(C) of the statute also makes it a state crime for undocumented immigrants from applying for a job or working in the state. It is also held preempted as imposing an obstacle to the federal regulatory system. Because Congress obviously chose not make working in the country without proper authorization a federal crime, states cannot enact additional criminal penalties Congress decided not to impose.

4. Warrantless Arrest Of Individuals Believed To Have Committed A Deportable Crime.
Section 6 of the statute authorizes state law enforcement officials to arrest without a warrant any individual otherwise lawfully in the country, if law enforcement officials have probable cause to believe the individual has committed a deportable offense. The Court held that this provision is preempted. Whether and when to arrest someone for being unlawfully in the country is a question solely for the federal government.

----------

Only one part of SB1070 was allowed to stand, but the court specifically said that it could still overturn that piece (the "show your papers" piece) if its implementation turns out to violate civil rights.

That brings us back to the original question - on what basis can the police "suspect" someone is in the country illegally OTHER than race?

The warning to Arizona will help insure that the state implements this remaining piece of the law so carefully that either civil rights will not be infringed (which was the whole problem with the law) or they will violate civil rights and the case will return to the SCOTUS to be overturned.

Either way, today's decision is a win for freedom and civil rights.

Dan the Man wrote:

<quoted text>
ARE there any black Mormons? LOL!
The Mormon church was aggressively racist for the first 150 years of its existence with a formal policy forbidding black men from serving in leadership.
Come to think of it - are YOU Mormon, Cletus the K-D M-B Racist?

..........

Black Caucus:

Whites Not Allowed

By: Josephine Hearn

January 22, 2007 01:01 PM EDT

As a white liberal running in a majority African American district, Tennessee Democrat Stephen I. Cohen made a novel pledge on the campaign trail last year:

If elected, he would seek to become the first white member of the Congressional Black Caucus.

Now that he's a freshman in Congress, Cohen has changed his plans. He said he has dropped his bid after several current and former caucus members made it clear to him that whites need not apply.

"I think they're real happy I'm not going to join," said Cohen, who succeeded Rep. Harold Ford, D-Tenn., in the Memphis district.

"It's their caucus and they do things their way.

You don't force your way in.

You need to be invited."

http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm...

..........

Too bad you don't have the same amount of interest in debating issues as you do in personal attacks and paranoid conspiracies.

But I guess a double-digit IQ can only do so much, huh?