Judged:
1
1
1
(Let's get some sliders.)
Comments
|
Judged:
1
1
1 (Let's get some sliders.) |
|
|
Judged:
1
1
1 |
|
|
Why can't you pigs just leave us hippies alone!
|
|
|
Judged:
1
1
1 |
|
|
Judged:
1
1
1 |
|
|
We have serious crimes out there, things that warrant police attention. There are substances that are legal that are far more harmful to the body than marijuana. Still, we persecute those who do it IN THEIR OWN HOMES. No, I've never done marijuana, but I do think it's a gross waste of our tax dollars for the federal, state and local government to prosecute these people. It's time for the laws to change. So long as they're not driving, on the job, giving it to a minor or causing physical harm to one another, it's really none of anybody's business.
|
|
|
Judged:
1
1 |
|
|
Judged:
1
1 |
|
|
Judged:
1
1 |
|
|
Judged:
1
1
1 Yeah, we wouldn't want to you be looking for real criminals that actually harmed someone else. Marijuana prohibition is a scam and violates 9 of the first ten amendments to the Constitution. There is no compelling reason for marijuana to remain illegal for any purpose, medical, religious or recreational. |
|
|
Judged:
1 Or she could move to: Washington state Oregon Nevada Montana Colorado Alaska Hawaii Vermont Rhode Island and Maine... ...in addition to California. These are the 11 states with some sanity regarding marijuana. |
|
|
Judged:
1
1 he war on drugs costs taxpayers more than $40 billion dollars a year. More than two-thirds of this money is spent on enforcement, court and prison, while only one-third is spent on drug education. An additional $20 billion is spent by state and local funders on anti-drug measures for things such as imprisonment, policing and prosecution. http://www25.uua.org/uuawo/new/article.php... |
|
|
Judged:
1
1 |
|
|
Judged:
1
1
1 One harvest for the entire year, perhaps? Did you consider that one? |
|
|
Just get 12 smokers on the jury!
|
|
|
Judged:
1
1
1 Ever hear of jury nullification? I know judges and lawyers don't like it because it gives the common people power. But it is the concept of not only judging the accused but also the law he is accused of breaking. The jury may find that the person did indeed break the law as written, but they find the law to be unjust and in a sense overturn the law by finding the accused not guilty because of the unjustness of the law. It is a check We, the People have on our government. Too bad our government is afraid of the People exercising any authority. www.fija.org |
|
Thats it...I'm moving! |
|
|
How 'bout it Indiana - ready to move into the 21st century??
|
|
|
Uncle Hempy says it all! You're awesome!
|
|
Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.
| Topic | Updated | Last By | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peanuts. lightbulbs, and red X's | 41 min | Naked Guy Ne... | 15 |
| Ez-look | 42 min | Naked Guy Ne... | 14 |
| You are invited | 47 min | Naked Guy Ne... | 1 |
| Prayer Requests | 2 hr | showmom | 17 |
| good bye michael | 6 hr | Plexico | 37 |
| shelly ferguson | 9 hr | close friend | 3 |
|
|
21 hr | Geez | 0 |