Bill Clinton is a Big, Fat Liar

New FEC probe.

Potentially, the largest campaign finance fraud in US history.

Hillary Clinton accountability report:
www.hillcap.org

ashling wrote:

New FEC probe.
Potentially, the largest campaign finance fraud in US history.
Hillary Clinton accountability report:
www.hillcap.org

Great link, ashling! I recommend all to visit.

Trim Bush wrote:

<quoted text>
Great link, ashling! I recommend all to visit.

Thanks. Pleased that you enjoyed it.

Nothing like a microscope to allow people to see beneath the hype, and beyond the smoke and mirrors. Albeit, if only to secure for one's self, a much better perspective of the events that are unfolding before our eyes.

and sexual abuser

AMEN!

Truth vs Clinton...again

Uh....Hillary admits that she "mis-spoke"?[They had to run with their heads down while under sniper fire after getting off the plane in Bosnia??] She admits it was a "mis-statement"? The video proves she is a LIAR!!! Call it what it is A BIG FAT LIE!

The Clintons are well known for their inability to genuinely speak the unadulterated truth. They embellish and twist their words to fit whatever situation they speak about. This is only the tip of their corruption iceburg. We are the ignorant masses that must suck-up whatever the Clintons spew out of their mouths. Surely, every American KNOWS the truth about the Clintons by now?????

Some of these comments are the funniest I've ever read. Must be a bunch of fat dumb toothless hicks if they care more about a president lying about a blowjob than a president like Bush who lies about everything. FactCheck put Bush so far on something like 950 lies just in regards to Iraq. Give me a break, toothless hicks are so funny they're almost worth keeping around.

lou ramsey wrote:

WHO'S A BIGGER LIAR THAN BUSH??????

Clinton, most leading democrats

I supposed the republicans & the president that ruled for the last 8 years never lied to the Americans. I think the current national deficit & many American sons & daughter died since the war begun prove for itself. That many of us not tell the difference.Obama is supported by reach people who once supported Bush Jr.Another tax cut deal for the rich people again & this time the democratic presidential nominee 2008 is going to do it.Some other just want change.This is another Bush deal for the rich people only this time it has the label of Obama in it.The truth is no rich people wanted the Clinton, because it is the rich people who got us all in shit hole economy with the Bush Jr in the first place.If you don't want to solve the deficit & keep the economy in bad shape for a while.Voted to a candidate that supported only the rich people.After all the rich people has the gold, then they make the rules.It hard to vote for a president who cannot protect our nation.Obama just like to talk things through, while the terrorist are killing Americans.You still want to vote for Obama? You get who you vote.

Brett Naum wrote:

<quoted text>
Clinton, most leading democrats

Stupid Americans who think their politician never lied.

Here goes wrote:

Truth vs Clinton...again
Uh....Hillary admits that she "mis-spoke"?[They had to run with their heads down while under sniper fire after getting off the plane in Bosnia??] She admits it was a "mis-statement"? The video proves she is a LIAR!!! Call it what it is A BIG FAT LIE!
The Clintons are well known for their inability to genuinely speak the unadulterated truth. They embellish and twist their words to fit whatever situation they speak about. This is only the tip of their corruption iceburg. We are the ignorant masses that must suck-up whatever the Clintons spew out of their mouths. Surely, every American KNOWS the truth about the Clintons by now?????

TRUTH VS YOURSELF!

Paul wrote:

<quoted text>
Stupid Americans who think their politician never lied.

That too.

Paul wrote:

I supposed the republicans & the president that ruled for the last 8 years never lied to the Americans. I think the current national deficit & many American sons & daughter died since the war begun prove for itself. That many of us not tell the difference.Obama is supported by reach people who once supported Bush Jr.Another tax cut deal for the rich people again & this time the democratic presidential nominee 2008 is going to do it.Some other just want change.This is another Bush deal for the rich people only this time it has the label of Obama in it.The truth is no rich people wanted the Clinton, because it is the rich people who got us all in shit hole economy with the Bush Jr in the first place.If you don't want to solve the deficit & keep the economy in bad shape for a while.Voted to a candidate that supported only the rich people.After all the rich people has the gold, then they make the rules.It hard to vote for a president who cannot protect our nation.Obama just like to talk things through, while the terrorist are killing Americans.You still want to vote for Obama? You get who you vote.

OMG, the sky is falling !

Has anyone noticed that when Hillary or her daughter are addressing a tough question (which is seldom) that "bob" their heads in agreement with what they are saying ? Reminds me of the "bobbers" sitting in the rear windows of cars. Their comments also utilize. "well, you know" extensively while they are searching for the proper words when off their memorized speeches. Both are dummer than bricks.

Paul wrote:

<quoted text>
TRUTH VS YOURSELF!

Yes, I'll stand by the truth about the Clintons. Furthermore, your' comments about Bush and the rest are true also. The candidates, all of them, are a pitiful bunch to take the reigns of this country. Do the research and find out for yourself what is true and what is not. The Bush family history is online for all to see. There's never been a surprise coming from the Bush camp. Our country is a pawn in the hands of those who, for their own reasons, have already driven all of us into the ground. To regain the power and respect that America once held in the world...who really has the interest of American people as their priority? None. These candidates do not have the qualifications to lead this country out of the mess we are in. Who to vote for? It's a toss-up.

Do you care about your free speech rights?
http://www.nab.org/AM/aspcode/fcccomments/FCC...

Telling it like it is
/Blackmail and the Clintons' pervasive corruption/
Blackmail is an ugly deed, especially when used to conceal crimes,
political wrong-doing and abuse of power. Nevertheless, the reek of
blackmail coming from the White House and enveloping the Beltway is
unmistakable. No one in Washington's public arena privately disputes
that Clinton aides copied from 900 misappropriated FBI files enough
damaging material to silence most of their Republican critics.
Recall how the White House attempted to destroy the reputations and
credibility of Senators Hyde and Burton by releasing information
revealing their indiscretions.
No wonder George Stephanopoulos confidently bragged the "long-term
strategy" of the White House could be "explosive". The idea that
blackmail is at the heart of White House strategy was strengthened
by rumours that Clinton aides held very private meetings with Barney
Frank, Democratic representative from Massachusetts and expert
blackmailer.
Frank brought his expertise in to play when he found his career
threatened by the scandal of putting Steve Gobie on his payroll.
Answering a personal ad in the homosexual Washington Blade, Frank
met with Gobie, a male prostitute with convictions for theft, drug
trafficking and sodomising a child. They certainly must have hit it
off on their first meeting because shortly afterwards Gobie moved in
to Frank's house, from where he ran a male prostitute business among
other things. To cut this squalid tale short, Frank escaped the
consequences of his action by threatening to reveal the identities
of closet homosexuals. What Frank knows is what some Clinton aides
wanted to combine with the information they stole from the FBI. They
had hopeed that this information would have given them the
"explosive" they needed to get their boss off the impeachment hook.
Anyone who thinks the above is far fetched does not know Clinton.
This is the man who made Patsy Thomasson - chief lietenant of
convicted cocaine dealer Dan Lasater - White House chief of
personnel. This appointment did not surprise those who knew of the
Clinton/Lasater drug connection that many believe existed before
Clinton became governor. The connection might also explain the
extraordinary expansion of mob activity that occurred after Clinton
became governor. That the FBI was concerned about the rise of the
'Arkansas mafia' under Clinton and its drug running operations and
prostitution rackets is no big secret.
That Clinton 'was' a frequent cocaine user is a well known fact that
the media chooses to ignore, even though his brother, Roger, a
convicted dealer,was taped during an anti-drug operation saying:
"Got to get some for my brother. He's got a nose like a vacuum
cleaner". That Clinton was linked to cocaine smuggling in the 1980s
is already part of sworn testimony. That his association with the
drug-trafficking Lasater is connected with the gunning down in 1993
of Clinton's chief of security (the man who knew too much?) in

Little Rock is assumed as given by many of that city's good citizens.
So bad is the situation that it was immediately assumed that the
killers would never be arrested. They never were. How could they be,
whispered critics, when one of the first acts of the Clintons was to
replace all US Attorneys "with our people." An unprecedented and
dictatorial act that gave the Clintons control over the
prosecutorial machinery of the federal government in every judicial
district in the country. To top this off, the Clintons even
maneuvered to get Webster Hubbel installed as Attorney General -
before he went to jail where he threatened to cooperate with Starr.
However,$US700,000 plus in hush money, clumsily disguised as
consultancy fees.
To strengthen their control further they had William Sessions,
Director of the FBI, removed. Sessions was noted for his integrity
and opposition to political interference in the Bureau's affairs.
(No wonder he had to go.) Clinton groupie Louis Freeh was made
Director of the FBI. Rumour now has it that FBI agents have withheld
sensitive information from Freeh in the belief, rightly or wrongly,
that it would be passed on to the White House which is now
considered, to put it mildly, a security risk.
The irony and added danger for the Clintons is that Freeh might
start taking his job seriously, unless they have something on him
too. That this may be so is why some people believe Freeh refused in
May 1998 to prevent the New York Times blowing an FBI operation that
centered on Johnny Chung, a Clinton fundraiser, thus endangering his
life. Any wonder it is now thought that the White House fed the
details of the undercover operation to so-called hot-shot NYT
reporters Don Vanatta, Jeff Gerth and David Johnston, confident in
the knowledge that Freeh would not intervene. No wonder the NYT was
able to smugly claim it would have postponed the story for a couple
of days if only Freeh had asked it to do so. Yep, there's one hell
of smell round there.
What is really shocking is how the media, with a few brave
exceptions, literally covers for the Clintons, even enthusiastically
assassinating the characters of his critics, impugning their motives
and smearing their reputations. These media storm troopers subjected
the likes of Tripp and Jones to the most appalling abuse and
constantly vilified Starr while defending the Clintons' corrupt
practises.
There is literally no arm of government that has not been infected
by this morally diseased administration. However, the Democratic
Party and the mainstream media only remain untouched by Clinton's
corruption because their moral collapse had take place decades ago.
It was this collapse that made the Clinton administration possible.
Editor: Australia's media, particularly the Murdoch press, has stood
four square behind the Clinton presidency, making a mockery out of
the media's public's-right-to-know doctrine.
from TPDL 2000-May-1, from the Washington Post 2000-Apr-29 p.B3, by Cindy Loose: