Michigan Felon Politician Ban Amendment, Proposal 2

rider wrote:

<quoted text> hate to chase you off, yet the country has listened to BS and hate from the likes of you long enough. Enough is Enough! hasn't got a chance of losing in 12. talk about looney, you neo-cons are complete idiots. You might think about getting educated instead of sitting back whining about blacks and jews just because they are more intelligent than you. You are sounding like your weeper of the house. hee hee! The neo=cons bombed USS Liberty and conviently used Israel as thier scapegoat and now they are scapegoating Israel again. The "9/11 Missing Links" trap..- YouTube
www.youtube.com/watch ...
Mar 8, 2009 - 10 min - Uploaded by theCharmingDeviant
called "9/11 Missing Links". The video was produced by a group of Neo-Nazi's at prothink.org , where it originated, but ... How to you like all the s**t the world is heaping upon you, it is poetic justice isn't it?

Hey more useless links that nobody is going to click on!

Big surprise!!

Sandynuts will never be able to get elected. Sandynuts is a Qboy!!

ineeds to be washen me sandynuts too. whats you be meanin q-bouy

2010 9/11 MISSING LINKS BUS IN 3 JULY 4TH PARADES http://www.youtube.com/watch ...

I feel that they should put them in Jail for 20 years not from allowing them to run for office again for 20 years, Now that is Justice at its finest.
20 years it should be 60 years they will never learn anything after 20 years but you make it impossible to ever run for office again, then we can say we really did show them a thing or two.

THE MARINE

Government Foe wrote:

<quoted text>
AMEN!
It sometimes amazes me how some people complain about issues such as the $10 theft when they shouldn't be stealing anything anyway. Also, if a potential politician overspends or can't balance a simple checkbook, would you really want him/her in office running your government on a bigger scale?

None of your current polititions seem to know how to balance a checkbook now, no matter how much money is in it!

Like

mi courts are over or under harsh on every thing, child predators do little time and drunk drivers face sometimes multiple years. for instance another fucked up issue, my cousin was charged with a 5 and 2 year felony for attempting to shoot himself, and ive seen a friend get 2 years probation and a felony for the bad chech thing because his boss didnt deposit his paycheck on time.

bmxrrr wrote:

mi courts are over or under harsh on every thing, child predators do little time and drunk drivers face sometimes multiple years. for instance another fucked up issue, my cousin was charged with a 5 and 2 year felony for attempting to shoot himself, and ive seen a friend get 2 years probation and a felony for the bad chech thing because his boss didnt deposit his paycheck on time.

In a small town its all on who you know,There are certain families that the cops would do anything to lock them up,and there are certain ones they do everything they can to help them out

In regards to drunk driving, they most certainly deserve time. Seen too many family members impacted by drunk drivers, most were repeat offenders. The safety of our family members and our friends on the roads is of utmost importance to us, to have their lives shattered by someone who feels it is necessary to drive drunk when there are other options is beyond wrong. Getting them off the streets and clean is truly important.

However, child predators deserve far more time than they are getting as well. Keeping our kids safe is critical as well. Change is necessary.

I have heard that the prosecutor refuses to prosecute certain cases, is it due to budgeting? Why can we not prosecute all offenders according to the law rather than pick and choose which case is more important?

@been there, i do agree drunk drivers deserve time but in some cases its as simple as being very little over the limit. MI is .08, some people can be over that from 2 beers, .09 makes you a criminal. thats what i dont agree with. in high school i participated in a police operated closed course [driving while intoxicated] program that the school/police put together, not all people drive drunk at .09-.13 blood alchohal contact. i do believe a high BAC is wrong but it should have limits or a graduating scale. a 250lb man is not influenced the same as a 115lb girl from a few drinks throughout the whole night, is all i was trying to say. sorry for not clarifying.

Against: for several reasons. Namely, I'm not so sure If I actually care. I imagine If it were a repeat offender or someone well off. What If they were allowed to hold a board to approve whether or not to allow a felon? This is actually something to think long and hard about. I will post a link to this forum on my website www.babblestuff.com
It's interesting.

Ahh, Sandynuts can't run. He's busy behind the Hobby shopp anyway.

They should also have this for Michigan Misdemeaner Politician Ban Amendment, Proposal 2.Just doing a Felony will not be enough.People who commit a Misdemeaner have still broken the law. Just ask any police officer. I talk from experience. I can't vote,because of a Misdemeaner that is on my record.I registered to vote,and was denied.

RWW wrote:

They should also have this for Michigan Misdemeaner Politician Ban Amendment, Proposal 2.Just doing a Felony will not be enough.People who commit a Misdemeaner have still broken the law. Just ask any police officer. I talk from experience. I can't vote,because of a Misdemeaner that is on my record.I registered to vote,and was denied.

hahaaha serves you right

Skeeter wrote:

Anarkie awaits due to a lack of leaders,now ?

sounds good to me

Most decent remaining countries just shoot the gold brick non contributing felons.

I don't like this ban

This law should also go after school officials who steal money from school districts. Anyone caught should not work in education related business anymore not only in Michigan but also in the whole nation.

http://www.mountainmarttreks.com

Kangchenjunga base camp trek

Kangchenjunga base camp trek is one of the challenging nature adventure in Nepal. Kangchenjunga (8586m) is a massive and independent mountain of rock and ice, which sits astride the Nepalese-Sikkim/Indian border. It rises on a N/S axis, roughly at right angles to the main Himalayan chain – and linked to it by ridges. Secondary ridges lie in east/west direction which together creates the four glaciers that flow from its five summits. For 15km, the southern border-ridge is nowhere less than 7500m in height. Only Everest and K2 are higher.

The Kangchenjunga Conservation Area (KCA) can be reached by either road or air. Taplejung (near the new airport at Suketar) is the most convenient place to begin a trek. From there, a two week trek to the southern base camp near Ramche on the Yalung glacier; three week trek to the northern base camp at Pang Pema on the Kangchenjunga glacier; or a four week combined trek which includes a crossing of the five-pass Mirgin La (4663m) range between Tseram and Ghunsa. From the high passes, magnificent views of such giants as Everest, Makalu, Chamlang and Kangchenjunga are possible. The mountain views beyond Ghunsa are breathtaking, even by Himalayan standards.

Kangchenjunga is not only large enough to create its own weather, but also receives the full force of the south-west monsoon crossing the plains of Bengal. This results in an extraordinary variation of vegetation and climate within a small region. 65% of the KCA’s area is covered by rocks and ice. The region also offers a rich cultural diversity with the Limbu people living in the lower regions and Tibetans higher up. The paths between the villages lead through picturesque farmland, magnificent forests and rugged valleys.Facilities for trekkers are limited, but the welcome is always warm. Tents are essential for use towards the base camps.

The reward for the hardship is the chance to trek through unspoiled Himalayan landscapes, far from the trappings of the modern age. The Kangchenjunga Base Camp trek has still not been touched by mass tourism. This trek is both culturally fascinating and geographically spectacular. It’s a trek you need to do once in a lifetime for adventure madness!
Trekking Itinerary

Day 01 Arrive Kathmandu (1,300m/4,264 ft)

Day 02 Kathmandu valley sightseeing & trek preparation (1,300m/4,264 ft)

Day 03: Fly Kathmandu – Biratnagar (45 minutes flight)

Day 04: Fly Biratnagar – Suketar – Lali Kharak Kharka (2220 m/7300 ft) 3-4 hrs trek

Day 05: Lali Kharka – Sinchewa Bhanjyang (2240 m/7400ft) 5-6 hrs trek

Day 6: Sinchewa Bhanjyang – Phumpe (1780 m/5900ft) 5-6 hrs trek

Day 7: Phumpe – Yamphudin (1690 m/5600 ft) 5-6 hrs trek

Day 8: Yamphudin – Amji Khola (2340 m/7800 ft) 4-5 hrs trek

Day 9: Amji Khola – Torontan (2990 m/9900 ft) 5-6 hrs trek

Day 10: Torontan – Tseram (3870 m/13900 ft) 4 -5 hrs trek

Day 11: Tseram – Ramche (4620 m/15400ft) 2-3 hrs.

Day 12:Ramche – Visit Oktang (viewpoint)– Chukkung Pokhari (4450m/14600ft) 5-6 hrs trek.

Day 13: Chukkung Chhuchung Pokhari – Sinelapche La (4640m/15224ft)– Mirgin La (4650m 4480?/15256ft)-

Day 14: Rest day in Ghunsa

Day 15: Ghunsa – Kambachen (4150m/13650ft) 3-4 hrs trek

Day 16: Khambachen (Kambachen)– Lonak (4790m/15900ft) 4-5 hrs trek

Day 17: Lhonak – Pangpema base camp (5160m/17200ft) 3-4 hrs trek

Day 18: Excursion day in Pangpema Base Camp.

Day 19: Pangpema – Kambachen: 5-6 hrs trek

Day 20: Kambachen – Ghunsa – Phale: 5-6 hrs trek

Day 21 Phale – Amjilosa (2140m/7100ft) 5-6 hrs trek

Day 22: Amjilosa – Chiruwa (Chirwa)(1190m/3900 ft) 5-6 hrs trek

Day 23: Chirwa – Linkhim (1520m/4985ft),5-6 hrs trek

Day 24: Linkhim – Suketar (2700 m/8856ft.) 5-6 hrs trek.

Day 25: We take the morning flight to Biratnagar and an onward flight to Kathmandu. After checking in at the group hotel, a free afternoon in Kathmandu.