Judged:
1
Posted in the Murray Forum
Comments (Page 2)
|
Judged: 1 |
|
|
Judged: 1 1 1 |
|
|
Judged: 1 1 1 or on welfare. So dont go be successful dont reach for the stars dont worry about getting left behind if you sit on your lazy ass because liberals will make sure everyone goes down to take care of you. Yea that sounds like a great place to live. |
|
|
Judged: 1 1 1 The middle class has been brainwashed to worry about the people beneath them, rather than the people above them! Some people argue that these corporations provide jobs and other benefits. I wonder if these same people realize that corporations hoard money, whereas people on welfare immediately inject the money they receive right back into the economy. Trickle down economics hasn't worked in 10+ years! Our government would rather cut programs that help people to give the money to corporations that don't need it, don't recirculate it, and only use it on themselves! We need to cut military spending, cut farm subsidies, tax churches, and get rid of corporate welfare! |
|
That's actually an oxymoron "Dumb Liberal" considering the definition of Liberal is the opposite of dumb... Conservative is the word that would be most associated with being dumb. Besides, judging by the way you spell you're one of those mailbox check dependents. And in reality a libertarian would be considered a liberal, so get your facts straight. |
|
|
Libs are the bomb
|
|
At least he is consistent. You could make a video of Romney where he is taking opposite stances on each issue. |
|
|
United States |
We need to get rid of dumb ass's like you! cut tax's on every one but you. shut the government back to part time. put in term limets and let working people keepwhat they earn! all but you that is. you like big government so you support it by your self! |
. You're kidding right. You do see the coralation that he's done nothing for nearly four years. Really. |
|
|
If Republican policies are so right for the U.S., why are so many "red" states that vote mostly Republican so poor, rank near the bottom in education, and provide such low levels of average income?
We've had lower and lower taxes on the high income groups since 1980, interuped by Clintons four years of slightly higher rates (producing historic economic growth and actual surpluses), and except for the Clinton years, the result has been that the middle class is shrinking and the median income dropping since Clinton left office. All this while the poverty rolls swell and the very rich get much richer. There's only one logical outcome if it continues and it is going to be ugly for everyone inside the borders of the U.S. |
|
|
Since: Jan 11
|
Judged: 1 Hey, moron, check your facts. National debt has increased more under Republican Presidents than Democrats. |
|
United States |
Better question why are those red states not running in the red? And for the most part have lower unemployment then blue states? |
Most all states are not allowed to run deficits. Instead, they cut services until they don't. And who said red states have lower unemployment than blue states? |
|
|
United States |
maybe we should do the same thing at the fed, levil. and U.S. labor stat reporting service. look it up. |
In a addition to being bad economic policy, requiring a balanced budget at the federal level would mean that we would have to stop making war on brown people and cut the military down to some kind of rational level. You know, like to defend against another country who actually might attack us? What should happen is surpluses in good economic times and deficits in recessions resulting in a balance over the long run. Again, that won't happen while we try to run an empire. Here's a link to a map of unemployment by state. The correlation is more by region than by party, although the entire southeast (republican states) is in the bottom half of employment rates. Remember, you were the one who stated that red states had lower unemployment rates. That obviously isn't true. http://images.search.yahoo.com/images/view... |
|
|
Since: Oct 09
|
Because they receive more in Federal tax dollars than they send up? |
|
Tell me when this thread is updated: |
|
Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.
| Topic | Updated | Last By | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
6 min | wtf | 35,603 |
|
|
7 min | wtf | 90,164 |
| Larry Elkins?? | 14 min | Wonder | 11 |
| Carter-sivills affair | 57 min | Really | 1 |
| Dexter hill | 1 hr | okay | 2 |
| wreck on scyamore street | 1 hr | okay | 3 |
| Karma Police | 1 hr | okay | 7 |
|
|
15 hr | Voter | 43 |
|
|
Wed | on another thought | 788 |