created by: CitizenTopix | Oct 11, 2010

Oklahoma

1,306 votes

OK Health Care Freedom Amendment, State Question 756

Click on an option to vote

  • Yes
  • No
  • Other (explain below)

Comments (Page 951)

Showing posts 19,001 - 19,020 of62,145
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Reality

Oklahoma City, OK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#19538
May 13, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Liberal silliness doesn't stand up to everyday life, unless you want a life under a failed government of the European slaughterhouse.

(Remember where two world wars were started?)
Packing Heat

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#19539
May 13, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Just'an'Idiot let me address some of your ignorant postings. While this thread is more than a book full of your liberal bullshit, I will attempt at what you addressed at me ONLY IN PART. I may address more if I choose but that is entirely up to me. You are very much like a hemorrhoid; both irritate anyone's ass if not properly treated

Page 949 - Like I said there Meat trying to distract with Obamacare-socilalized.....bull shit again. Problem he has, he never explains how buying insurance is socialism. Right now the uninsured just goes to the hospital and wants us to pay for it. Now that is what?
** Not distracting, pointing out the ultimate goal of this bullshit legislations! Single Payer System is Obama's ultimate goal this bullshit and full government control. Overwhelm the insurance industry with bankrupting regulations and Government own when it fails you stupid moron. Who gives a damn what you want or think, not I.**

Page 949 - Oh...Meat..your little buddy is waiting for you to back him up on voter fraud facts...you going to leave him hangin....yes you are...you just go back and rinse and repeat the same old tired Republican talking points..what new.
** Look Maggot, I have no buddies on Topix and absolutely no one waiting for me to back them up on anything they post. And You! You maggot, have nothing or no one to back up any bullshit you posted beyond a liberal blog and absolutely nothing worthy of note!

Page 949 - Gee, in your world this shouldn't be too much of a problem.
** In my world that is exactly how it is! Don't like it? Kiss my ass!
Packing Heat

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#19540
May 13, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Just'an'Idiot let me address some more of your ignorant postings. While this thread is more than a library full of your liberal bullshit, I will attempt at what you addressed at me ONLY IN PART. I may address more again if I choose but that is entirely up to me. You are very much like a hemorrhoid, both irritate anyone's ass if not properly treated and I doubt this treatment will change anything about you when you refuse to face the truth.

Page 949 - If mandates are ruled unconstitutional, whats to stop hospitals from throwing off their mandate of treating patients without insurance?
** Congress is stopping them, but I would like to see that mandate over thrown as well and force those who don't have coverage to address their problem and not make it mine. Being stupid and too lazy to be self-supportive first instead of always a handout from the Government (TAXPAYER) for all your support out of the pockets of others is absolute bullshit on its face.**

Page 949 - After all isn't that your mantra that nobody is entitled to health care?
** Any individual in this country has a right to purchase any medical service they desire but… what they do not have a right to… force someone else to pay for it! That is the law Liberal Loonies want to enforce! That's right, my mantra is no one is entitled to it, they have a right to purchase it however they can pay for it. THIS IS NOT AND WILL NOT BECOME A SOCIALIST NATION FOR ALL, YOU TWIT, no matter how many times you say it or wish it!

Page 949 - We could go even further, why should ambulances come out for the injured in the patient has no insurance?
** We could and we should but we have progressive socialist fighting us every step of the way.**

Page 949 - They still get treatment. All you do is push off the costs onto the insured and the taxpayer. Forced socialism.
** No I don't, that is a law progressives pushed through and I want it repealed. No one is entitled to anyone else's labor or service for free. Never should have had a law like that to start with!
Page 949 - Either you are for treating the uninsured and giving us the means to force the ones who can afford insurance share the costs or leaving the uninsured to die.
** I am against treating the uninsured at the expense of those insured. This bill only drives up the cost for those that pay and still gives those that don't a free ride. The only thing that has changed is it will bankrupt this insurance industry and then the Government at the expense of everyone.
Page 949 - That's why your argument against Obamacare never takes it to it's logical conclusion. You leave the costs of the uninsured in limbo so you can rail against the costs but offer no solutions.
** The Ryan Plan is the best solution on the table at the moment and it has been passed with bi-partisan support in Congress. It is the Democrat Senate that will not compromise and that is what will get fixed in 2012 as well as boot Obama's ass out. WATCH!

Page 949 - Because what you want is barbaric.
** Call it what you like, it is fair and it force those that free ride to pay or do with out. That is their choice without penalizing those that take care of their business. You're right, I don't give a damn what you think, you're nothing more than entertainment for me!
GET USED TO IT!

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#19541
May 13, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Hey Tam, Minute and I disagree on more than we agree with, gay-marriage, cause of global warming, Mid-East, guns, fracking, but we both are in good judgment going to vote for Obama.

Have you decided yet who you are gonna give it up to? You know you are anonymous here, well almost.

Key for me is the Court system and in that, Republican policy must not prevail, and of course it is esential that we have national healthcare.

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#19542
May 13, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Republicans love humanity but hate people.

Democrats love people but hate humanity.
Justaminute

Edmond, OK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#19543
May 13, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Well, at least Democrats and people like me are not so self righteous and pious that they use some wording from the bible to ruin other people's life time here on earth. And then turn around and talk about THEIR freedoms and government interference in THEIR life. Their the ones that can really go off on Muslims and then turn around and use the Bible to justify their assault on other peoples life. It's the hallmark of a hypocrite and their seems to be quite a few on these boards.
Packing Heat

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#19544
May 13, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

You are "The Third Row" Citizen…

The person talking is Michael Berry is from Houston... he has a talk show on an AM station 740am in mid morning. Many in the Houston area listen to him while driving in the am to get the traffic reports in Houston as well.

The lady, Sheila Jackson Lee (Houston Democrat Dumbass) that is shown early in this clip is a missing idiot from a village down that way.

The very sad part about this posting is, that not all who read this will tell about it to those they are connected with. Some will take a look at it, and then ignore it because it MAY be controversial or someone may say you're just racist. And that is the problem with the world we live in today is many want to make one size fit all and that Government (Politicians) always know best.

Think about this.
Everyone of you reading this are in the eyes of Democrats and Politicians in general nothing more than "The Third Row Citizen" they have to contend with in order to keep power for their own financial gain. Think about that for a moment. It is all about power and money to them.

Click here to see what I mean: http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup...
Packing Heat

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#19545
May 13, 2012
 
WMCOL wrote:
Hey Tam, Minute and I disagree on more than we agree with, gay-marriage, cause of global warming, Mid-East, guns, fracking, but we both are in good judgment going to vote for Obama.
Have you decided yet who you are gonna give it up to? You know you are anonymous here, well almost.
Key for me is the Court system and in that, Republican policy must not prevail, and of course it is esential that we have national healthcare.


Hey TAMARA, is this right? Obama is your choice to lead unproductive seniors off the cliff? I respect your choice as everyone should respect everyone's free right and choice that they vote for. It is rather funny I never saw you post up that you have decided Obama was your "out of good judgment" choice but… I could have missed with all that garbage "Just'an'Idiot" has been piling on. Can you point me toward your posting of this decision please?

Thank you and best regards,
"Packing Heat" everywhere I go.
Tamara

Edmond, OK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#19546
May 13, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Packing Heat wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey TAMARA, is this right? Obama is your choice to lead unproductive seniors off the cliff? I respect your choice as everyone should respect everyone's free right and choice that they vote for. It is rather funny I never saw you post up that you have decided Obama was your "out of good judgment" choice but… I could have missed with all that garbage "Just'an'Idiot" has been piling on. Can you point me toward your posting of this decision please?
Thank you and best regards,
"Packing Heat" everywhere I go.
Not this time as the way things are going today. I gave Obama my vote last time and I am not happy with the way things stand today. But I will be fair like time and listen to both sides till it is time to vote. I just hope Romney is smarter than McCain and pick wisely a running mate.
Justaminute

Edmond, OK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#19547
May 13, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

WMCOL wrote:
Republicans love humanity but hate people.
Democrats love people but hate humanity.
What does that even mean?
Packing Heat

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#19548
May 13, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Tamara wrote:
<quoted text>Not this time as the way things are going today. I gave Obama my vote last time and I am not happy with the way things stand today. But I will be fair like time and listen to both sides till it is time to vote. I just hope Romney is smarter than McCain and pick wisely a running mate.


I thought that was what I read last time you commented on that decision. I guess WMCOL was just bearing false witness again as usual but again I could have as easily missed something amongst all that liberal gibberish non-sense Just'an'Idiot has clogged this thread with too! I'll remember that when I see WMCOL or Just'an'Idiot try to pass on another lie about you again.
Best regards
Justaminute

Edmond, OK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#19549
May 13, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Cocked Hat wrote:
You wasted a lot of writing on the supremacy clause. You still don't understand what I wrote. Qnd you still don't understand or accept the power the people of this nation were afforded. You are so used to living under the lie of a big government that you recoil at the supremeacy of the right of the people. The government does not rule us, we rule them.
Justaminute, are you Arab or from India? Those are the only people I have ever met who will ignore what is said and argue with a rock until the rock gives up.
Your mind is too closed to understand what you are reading. You're like Clinton asking what the definition of "is" is.
Well, I don't see people lining up to vote in someone that expresses your political thought. That's why you call yourself a neo-revolutionary but who identifies themselves in that way anyway? Someone who can't get the majority to go along with them and wants to use a like minded band (maybe at the most .0004% of the population) to overthrow the government or something along that line.

You called me a liar on voter fraud and when I produced the evidence off you go on another tangent about something else. Your just an ignorant political gadfly that picks up talking points off where, Free Republic maybe.

You know there's a reason why President Obama was elected, because the majority voted him into office that's why.

The only candidate that you and Meat have running for office that seems to endorse what you believe, at least at this moment but maybe not tomorrow, is Romney. That's it. You say your not for Romney, so basically you have no one. Your evidently a neo-revolutionary without a candidate. Well that will take your cause far, ha ha ha. It seem to me that if your political thought was in the mainstream you'd have at least one to be able to back.

It looks like my candidate President Obama will be a shoe in for the next election and gay rights may very well become the law of the land the way LBJ gave us civil rights. And that will be just fine with a majority of Americans. And just like the pollster for the Republicans says that the inability to evolve on gay rights will give the Republicans minority status for a generation.

I love the fact that as this story hit the blogsphere, Romney was addressing Liberty U where they teach a course that Mormonism is a cult but that's seems to be just hunky dorrey with the Mittster.

So it'll be fun to stick around and watch you guys wail and cry about YOUR freedoms being abused. And yes even with Obamacare's mandate maybe in jeopardy eventually like the rest of the civilized world we will get to some form of universal health care. Well maybe you can comfort yourself with the thought that probably Jesus would prefer Obamacare over the outright callousness of the previous health care insurance options we had before Obamacare which left millions without it.

So keep spinning away little Conked Hat but this is Oklahoma and it sure doesn't carry much weight in election or has legislation that seems to try and reflect your point of view that can stand up to judicial review since it gets kicked out due to being Unconstitutional. Oh, that's right, if you don't get your way it's called activist judges. It'll be fun to watch Obama get to nominate at least 2 or 3 to the Supreme Court in his next term.

So you go ahead and post your thoughts about that but that's about as far as it looks like it will go, on a Topix board..LOL
Justaminute

Edmond, OK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#19550
May 13, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Packing Heat wrote:
<quoted text>
I thought that was what I read last time you commented on that decision. I guess WMCOL was just bearing false witness again as usual but again I could have as easily missed something amongst all that liberal gibberish non-sense Just'an'Idiot has clogged this thread with too! I'll remember that when I see WMCOL or Just'an'Idiot try to pass on another lie about you again.
Best regards
What lie did I pass on about Tamara? I always knew she was more Republican than Democrat. I mean she'd have to be to side with you as much as she does.

You talk about false witness, LOL, how sanctimonious of you!
Justaminute

Edmond, OK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#19551
May 13, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

All the words Jesus Christ spoke about gay people in one place

That right, Jesus said nothing.

And here are all the jobs created by banning gay rights and harassing gay people along with all the dreams achieved by allowing gay kids to be bullied in school.

More nothing.

Conclusion:

Gay people should be treated as equals, same thing for everyone.

Being gay isn't a lifestyle choice but being a bigot is.
Justaminute

Edmond, OK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#19552
May 13, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

I've come to the conclusion that that term marriage should be left to the church like baptism.

Churches can preform marriages but they aren't legal and recognized by the state unless they are accompanied by a license.

So really we should leave the word marriage as a church thing and with no legal meaning unless a license is obtained. Just as baptism is. Your baptismal record sure can't take the place of a birth certificate even if you are called "born again."

It think if you need a nice word to define it maybe "A Joining". Which every couple no matter what the sex is can use. Because that is really all marriage is a legal partnership.

Because today most marriages are not entered into in a church. And thanks to the internet anyone can complete the obligation to perform one and not be a pastor, so that has already been taken out of the churches hands.

So to actually comply with the separation of church and state let the term marriage be separated from the church and state.

Because a couple should be able to join together as a legal entity just as much as any corporation. But no matter how religious your are that church service still needs a license from the state.

And I'm sure that if a gay couple still needs the word 'marriage' that there will be plenty of churches spring up to fulfill their needs. But the legal aspect of their joining will be fulfilled by the state as fully fledged American citizens who are due the privileges of all that entails.
Justaminute

Edmond, OK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#19553
May 13, 2012
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Justaminute wrote:
I've come to the conclusion that that term marriage should be left to the church like baptism.
Churches can preform marriages but they aren't legal and recognized by the state unless they are accompanied by a license.
So really we should leave the word marriage as a church thing and with no legal meaning unless a license is obtained. Just as baptism is. Your baptismal record sure can't take the place of a birth certificate even if you are called "born again."
It think if you need a nice word to define it maybe "A Joining". Which every couple no matter what the sex is can use. Because that is really all marriage is a legal partnership.
Because today most marriages are not entered into in a church. And thanks to the internet anyone can complete the obligation to perform one and not be a pastor, so that has already been taken out of the churches hands.
So to actually comply with the separation of church and state let the term marriage be separated from the church and state.
Because a couple should be able to join together as a legal entity just as much as any corporation. But no matter how religious your are that church service still needs a license from the state.
And I'm sure that if a gay couple still needs the word 'marriage' that there will be plenty of churches spring up to fulfill their needs. But the legal aspect of their joining will be fulfilled by the state as fully fledged American citizens who are due the privileges of all that entails.
Then you wouldn't need a divorce and that cold be just a dissolution of a legal partnership. And if a church was true to bible teaching marriage in church couldn't be preformed as the New Testament states that couples remarrying after divorce are committing adultery. So let the church and Christians live with their hypocrisy on the subject of divorce.

I also think it would be great that the only tax deduction Churches could take are 'Charitable Deductions' like helping the poor and needy and not building their mega churches or to gather more of their flock. Proselytizing is a biblical duty not a state duty and shouldn't require a tax deduction to do it. Remember your reward is in heaven not with a tax deduction.
Packing Heat

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#19554
May 13, 2012
 

Judged:

12

12

12

Newsweek cover coming May 21st: Obama ‘first queer president’.

It won't be nearly as controversial as Time magazine's breastfeeding cover, but Newsweek's May 21 issue declares Barack Obama the country's "first queer president."

Andrew Sullivan, the most disgusting perverted and openly queer political hack around, wrote the cover story. The magazine even gives the commander-in-queer a rainbow halo.

Sullivan wrote, "Obama had to discover his black identity first and then reconcile it with his white family and just as all queers discover their homosexual identity and then have to reconcile it with their heterosexual family."

The full cover story is not yet online, but in a blog post published earlier this week, Sullivan wrote that Obama's support of queer marriage brought him, a queer to tears.

I just can't stop laughing. Seriously, "First Queer President" this is priceless. I'm sure Obama wanted his legacy to be that he was the first queer in the Whitehouse and may all your children grow up to be queer like your fearless leader.

Dang you just can't make this stuff up!

It's a fine mess Obama has us in here. Now we have skin color versus skin color, gender versus gender, sexuality versus sexuality, not to mention, political party versus political party. So much, for "bringing everyone together now." How, in the world, did Obama get this country so frickin' out of hand and how many jobs will this create. Talking about avoiding the issues that concerns everyone more! This moron doesn't have a frickin clue!
Justaminute

Edmond, OK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#19555
May 13, 2012
 

Judged:

5

5

5

Justaminute wrote:
<quoted text>
Then you wouldn't need a divorce and that cold be just a dissolution of a legal partnership. And if a church was true to bible teaching marriage in church couldn't be preformed as the New Testament states that couples remarrying after divorce are committing adultery. So let the church and Christians live with their hypocrisy on the subject of divorce.
I also think it would be great that the only tax deduction Churches could take are 'Charitable Deductions' like helping the poor and needy and not building their mega churches or to gather more of their flock. Proselytizing is a biblical duty not a state duty and shouldn't require a tax deduction to do it. Remember your reward is in heaven not with a tax deduction.
That would be even better if Marriage is ordained in the Bible and they lay claim to it. The Divorce should be obtained by Christians in a Church. After all God says he is the Alpha and the Omega. Marriage begins in church and if it ends with the term Divorce let it end their too.

Joining of 2 individuals is already legally empowered by the state and dissolution is already left to the state not the Church. And the state can't discriminate on what the sex of the two individuals happens to be. After all in business a partnership can be described by two idividuals of the same sex. But we can make Joining restricted to two. Problem solved.
Justaminute

Edmond, OK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#19556
May 13, 2012
 

Judged:

5

5

5

Gee, Packing, how long did it take you to give yourself those 6 each little icons. I guess you are in desperate need of approval.
Packing Heat

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#19557
May 13, 2012
 

Judged:

5

5

5

Why was the queer fired from the sperm bank?
He was caught drinking on the job.

What's the difference between a fridge and a queer?
A fridge doesn't fart when you pull your meat out!

What does AIDS stand for?
Always In Deep Shit!

Why are they having trouble finding a cure for Aids??
The scientists can't get mice to butt fuck.

What do you call a lesbian with fat fingers?
Well-hung!

When a man and woman get married they need a marriage license. What do Lesbians need??
A licker license.

What's the definition of confusion?
Twenty blind lesbians in a fish market.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 19,001 - 19,020 of62,145
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Other Recent Muldrow Discussions

Search the Muldrow Forum:
Topic Updated Last By Comments
New Muldrow Police Chief 2 hr Ashley 10
Who do you support for Governor in Oklahoma in ... (Oct '10) 5 hr Indian 2,357
OK The "English is the Official Language of Oklaho... (Oct '10) 5 hr JAG 11,263
what happened to the burned baby?!??! 5 hr bob 7
Bethel a bad choice 8 hr citizen 5
Taylor 14 hr info 101 3
Review: Kxmx Mix 105.1 (Sep '13) Tue Roland native 16
•••
•••
•••
•••

Muldrow Jobs

•••
•••
•••

Muldrow People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••