Local News: Moore, OK 

 | 

Sign Up

 | 

Sign In

Advertisment

Women Challenge Oklahoma Abortion Law

Full story: News on 6 Tulsa

Two Oklahoma women are challenging a bill passed in 2009 that would require doctors who perform abortions to report a host of new information on the women seeking the procedure.

Read All 506 Comments

Comments

Showing posts 1 - 20 of506
< prev page
|
Go to last post| Jump to page:
Concerned

Lancaster, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1
Sep 30, 2009
 

Judged:

4

4

2

take birth control so you won't have to worry about this. they are free at the health department so you can't say it was too expensive. also every county has a health department and if you are indian you can go and get it for free from the indian clinic!! Please take the pill so you won't have to kill your baby
rican

Broken Arrow, OK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#4
Sep 30, 2009
 

Judged:

3

3

1

im so glad they pass bills that help absolutly noone. how about try to help oklahomans in a few ways before passing political useless bills that apease rite wing wakos. how about unemployment before the ten commandments. how about medical care before hunting pigs from helicopters. how about more dhs workers to deal with kids who need help now before we pass bills that serve no purpose other then make a few campain contributers happy
Miakoda

Tulsa, OK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5
Sep 30, 2009
 

Judged:

6

5

3

This is what happens when stupid uber-religious conservatives hold positions of power. Don't get me wrong, I DO NOT believe abortion should be used as a form of birth control, but this type of legislation infuses too much religious belief into law. I am a firm believer that church and state should be separate!
bill

Oklahoma City, OK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#6
Sep 30, 2009
 

Judged:

3

1

1

rican wrote:
im so glad they pass bills that help absolutly noone. how about try to help oklahomans in a few ways before passing political useless bills that apease rite wing wakos. how about unemployment before the ten commandments. how about medical care before hunting pigs from helicopters. how about more dhs workers to deal with kids who need help now before we pass bills that serve no purpose other then make a few campain contributers happy
I think its meant to protect children by discouraging the flushing of them down the drain. But you are right, a little DHS funding would be nice to.

Since: Aug 09

Tulsa, OK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7
Sep 30, 2009
 

Judged:

1

1

1

bill wrote:
<quoted text>
I think its meant to protect children by discouraging the flushing of them down the drain. But you are right, a little DHS funding would be nice to.
No, it's meant to accumulate a bunch of useless information so a government bureaucrat can have a job. SO much for privacy laws and HIPAA...
Against Abortion

Kingston, OK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#8
Sep 30, 2009
 

Judged:

3

3

2

Prolife is not a religious belief or issue. Abortion is a matter of life and death for a human being. The taking of a human life is murder, a crime punishable by law. This horrible practice should be absolutely abolished immediately.

“Greetings and Kind Regards”

Since: Apr 09

USA

ISP: Krebs, OK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#9
Sep 30, 2009
 

Judged:

2

2

1

Against Abortion wrote:
Prolife is not a religious belief or issue. Abortion is a matter of life and death for a human being. The taking of a human life is murder, a crime punishable by law. This horrible practice should be absolutely abolished immediately.
Your a dullard, i would rather see it(because it is not a child until later on in the process of pregnancy)not come to term, rather be mistreated or severly abused by the unwanting parents or parent, Be sides it is not your choice it is theirs stay out of it, and mind your own business worry about your own life!
And on a personal note i am not for abortion, but i do not feel it is my place to tell others how or what they should do
pro choice

Claremore, OK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10
Oct 1, 2009
 

Judged:

2

2

1

A neonate is not really a human being until it can move freely about on its own and feed itself. Until then, it is really no more than a parasitic organism, totally dependent on the woman who birthed it or some other adult human being for sustenance.

A woman should not be forced to sacrifice her personal nourishment to make milk for a neonate. She should not be forced to sacrifice her money to buy formula or other things the neonate might need before it is self-sufficient. A woman should not have to give up her career aspirations or other dreams or desires to care for an unwanted neonate, and she should never be forced to allow some stranger to raise her unwanted neonate just because the stranger cannot have a neonate of its own.

Women should be free to terminate all neonates up until the time that they are deemed self-sufficient by our elected officials. Of course, no one knows exactly when a neonate is self-sufficient, and the time may vary from case to case, so logically that date must be arbitrarily decided by officials. But once the date is set, it should be a legal and protected right for all women to terminate unwanted neonates without judgment or harassment from others.

I believe in all this, because I don't think any woman should be forced to do something she does not want to do, and neonates, as dependent organisms, are not really human after all. And anyone who thinks they are should stay out of it, because we don't want anyone trying to bestow rights on neonates!

(Oh yeah, a neonate... that's a newborn baby. And the difference between a neonate and a legally aborted baby is only a matter of weeks. Many aborted babies are at a more advanced gestational age than preemies who have been delivered and have survived and even thrived. But hey, we really don't want anyone defending those babies, because it is no one else's business, right?)

“Say it loud and proud.”

Since: Sep 08

Tulsa, OK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#11
Oct 1, 2009
 
And what are the new regulations for reporting? But I agree with the no sex-selection abortions people who do this should be so ashamed of themselves also no late term abortions.

“Say it loud and proud.”

Since: Sep 08

Tulsa, OK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#12
Oct 1, 2009
 
pro choice wrote:
A neonate is not really a human being until it can move freely about on its own and feed itself. Until then, it is really no more than a parasitic organism, totally dependent on the woman who birthed it or some other adult human being for sustenance.
A woman should not be forced to sacrifice her personal nourishment to make milk for a neonate. She should not be forced to sacrifice her money to buy formula or other things the neonate might need before it is self-sufficient. A woman should not have to give up her career aspirations or other dreams or desires to care for an unwanted neonate, and she should never be forced to allow some stranger to raise her unwanted neonate just because the stranger cannot have a neonate of its own.
Women should be free to terminate all neonates up until the time that they are deemed self-sufficient by our elected officials. Of course, no one knows exactly when a neonate is self-sufficient, and the time may vary from case to case, so logically that date must be arbitrarily decided by officials. But once the date is set, it should be a legal and protected right for all women to terminate unwanted neonates without judgment or harassment from others.
I believe in all this, because I don't think any woman should be forced to do something she does not want to do, and neonates, as dependent organisms, are not really human after all. And anyone who thinks they are should stay out of it, because we don't want anyone trying to bestow rights on neonates!
(Oh yeah, a neonate... that's a newborn baby. And the difference between a neonate and a legally aborted baby is only a matter of weeks. Many aborted babies are at a more advanced gestational age than preemies who have been delivered and have survived and even thrived. But hey, we really don't want anyone defending those babies, because it is no one else's business, right?)
You are almost beyond words.......Do you even know what a neonate is? I don't think you have a very good concept on the matter it's a newborn baby up to 28 days old out of the womb. Your context in which you use the term is incorrect. I am sorry but if you are suggesting is terminate a neonate? That's called murder cause the baby is already out of womb.....
What an oxygen theif....think before you speak cause you're looking pretty dumb from this point.

P.S. The term you are most likely looking for is fetus.

“A True Redhead”

Since: Sep 09

Tulsa, OK.

ISP: Tulsa, OK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#13
Oct 1, 2009
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Let's throw out the legislature, and put every issue to a vote of the people. (The problem with this suggestion, of course, is that we would have time to do nothing but vote 24 hours a day.) This is an onerous and invasive piece of legislation for any woman wishing to obtain an abortion (which is her legal right), for whatever reason she may have for doing so; I hope the lawsuit succeeds. But in this state success on the part of the suit is highly unlikely.

“A True Redhead”

Since: Sep 09

Tulsa, OK.

ISP: Tulsa, OK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#14
Oct 1, 2009
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Against Abortion wrote:
Prolife is not a religious belief or issue. Abortion is a matter of life and death for a human being. The taking of a human life is murder, a crime punishable by law. This horrible practice should be absolutely abolished immediately.
Just out of curiosity, where do you stand on the death penalty? According to the standard you have set forth here, the state has been committing murder ever since the death penalty statute became law. Doctors guilty of malpractice, in cases where the patient dies under their care, should be prosecuted for murder under these guidelines. Where does this end?

“A True Redhead”

Since: Sep 09

Tulsa, OK.

ISP: Tulsa, OK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#15
Oct 1, 2009
 
Concerned wrote:
take birth control so you won't have to worry about this. they are free at the health department so you can't say it was too expensive. also every county has a health department and if you are indian you can go and get it for free from the indian clinic!! Please take the pill so you won't have to kill your baby
The only type of birth control available for free at the Health Department is condoms. Birth control pills must be prescribed by a physician. They are never "free". In addition, some women incur serious health risks from taking bc pills. These women are prescribed, and fitted with, a diaphragm or IUD. This procedure is never "free" either.
scott

Oklahoma City, OK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#16
Oct 1, 2009
 

Judged:

1

1

1

swandive wrote:
<quoted text>
You are almost beyond words.......Do you even know what a neonate is? I don't think you have a very good concept on the matter it's a newborn baby up to 28 days old out of the womb. Your context in which you use the term is incorrect. I am sorry but if you are suggesting is terminate a neonate? That's called murder cause the baby is already out of womb.....
What an oxygen theif....think before you speak cause you're looking pretty dumb from this point.
P.S. The term you are most likely looking for is fetus.
swandive wrote:
<quoted text>
You are almost beyond words.......Do you even know what a neonate is? I don't think you have a very good concept on the matter it's a newborn baby up to 28 days old out of the womb. Your context in which you use the term is incorrect. I am sorry but if you are suggesting is terminate a neonate? That's called murder cause the baby is already out of womb.....
What an oxygen theif....think before you speak cause you're looking pretty dumb from this point.
P.S. The term you are most likely looking for is fetus.
Neonate:
"A newborn infant, especially one less than four weeks old."
Okay? So there is the definition. This swandive person is bored, bitter, and has an issue with everyone. This "swandive" is someone to be ignored. The controversy over abortion will be debated well beyond our personal lifetime. People here are voicing their opinions. Without debate there would be no progress. The problem I have is when people like SWANDIVE take issue with people merely because he/she has personal issues that he/she should deal with on his/her own time.
Now that I've immersed myself in this subject here we go. Are Christians right and Jews wrong? Are the Buddhists right or are Hindu's right. OR>>>> is this all tradition. Is all this religion a human devise that has existed well beyond the birth of Christ? To believe that Christians are saved and everyone else isn't is proof of a persons false reality and total misunderstanding of religion as it is taught by ministers/priests/etc... The truth is that we are here, we need to get along, we need each other all races/sexes/religions/EVERYONE . Thats not to say that we need MORE people. WE ARE OVERPOPULATING and its the delinquent people that are making all the babies. No more Natural Selection, we are breeding at a destructive rate. If a girl/woman wants to abort......GIVE ME A FREAKIN BREAK...LET THE POOR GIRL ABORT!!!! Do you REALLY care about this fetus/neonate/ whatever. DO YOU REALLY CARE!!!??? REALLYY??? No NO NO you dont. These poor people go these sugar coated churches singing Kumbaya around a campfire while the priest molests a boy in the tent next door. The days of being self-ritious are over SWANDIVE!!!!!!!!!! OVER!!!! There are much larger issues at stake like global warming/depleting ecosystems/polar ice-caps/nuclear science/ H1N1 lab created virus scare tactics to pad the pockets of Baxter pharms and politicians. The worlds problems are much bigger than you swandive. Go find your fishing pole and go fishing or something. You are a waste of oxygen.

“Say it loud and proud.”

Since: Sep 08

Tulsa, OK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#17
Oct 1, 2009
 

Judged:

1

1

scott wrote:
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
Neonate:
"A newborn infant, especially one less than four weeks old."
Okay? So there is the definition. This swandive person is bored, bitter, and has an issue with everyone. This "swandive" is someone to be ignored. The controversy over abortion will be debated well beyond our personal lifetime. People here are voicing their opinions. Without debate there would be no progress. The problem I have is when people like SWANDIVE take issue with people merely because he/she has personal issues that he/she should deal with on his/her own time.
Now that I've immersed myself in this subject here we go. Are Christians right and Jews wrong? Are the Buddhists right or are Hindu's right. OR>>>> is this all tradition. Is all this religion a human devise that has existed well beyond the birth of Christ? To believe that Christians are saved and everyone else isn't is proof of a persons false reality and total misunderstanding of religion as it is taught by ministers/priests/etc... The truth is that we are here, we need to get along, we need each other all races/sexes/religions/EVERYONE . Thats not to say that we need MORE people. WE ARE OVERPOPULATING and its the delinquent people that are making all the babies. No more Natural Selection, we are breeding at a destructive rate. If a girl/woman wants to abort......GIVE ME A FREAKIN BREAK...LET THE POOR GIRL ABORT!!!! Do you REALLY care about this fetus/neonate/ whatever. DO YOU REALLY CARE!!!??? REALLYY??? No NO NO you dont. These poor people go these sugar coated churches singing Kumbaya around a campfire while the priest molests a boy in the tent next door. The days of being self-ritious are over SWANDIVE!!!!!!!!!! OVER!!!! There are much larger issues at stake like global warming/depleting ecosystems/polar ice-caps/nuclear science/ H1N1 lab created virus scare tactics to pad the pockets of Baxter pharms and politicians. The worlds problems are much bigger than you swandive. Go find your fishing pole and go fishing or something. You are a waste of oxygen.
So I rest my case....you talk about me being bitter...ha ha ha.....look who's talking at least I do happen to care what happens to babies they are people too if they are out of the womb then they count you dont' get to choose if a child lives or not once it's born. You are correct a woman gets to choose while she's pregnate but once it's out it's still murder if you kill it.
Legal Czar

Tulsa, OK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#19
Oct 2, 2009
 
Miakoda wrote:
This is what happens when stupid uber-religious conservatives hold positions of power. Don't get me wrong, I DO NOT believe abortion should be used as a form of birth control, but this type of legislation infuses too much religious belief into law. I am a firm believer that church and state should be separate!
You misuse of the German language & equating "lifers" as "nazis" is PATHETIC & sick.

Why?

Hitler was PRO ABORTION on HIS demand; it is called EUGENICS & was/is whole-heatedly supported by & a founding principal of Planned Parenthood (BARF).

Don't beleive me?

Fine.

Do some research on Margret Sanger. I DARE you to learn!

Be glad YOUR parents weren't "choicers" LOL
Legal Czar

Tulsa, OK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#20
Oct 2, 2009
 
shovelhead72 wrote:
Let's throw out the legislature, and put every issue to a vote of the people.(The problem with this suggestion, of course, is that we would have time to do nothing but vote 24 hours a day.) This is an onerous and invasive piece of legislation for any woman wishing to obtain an abortion (which is her legal right), for whatever reason she may have for doing so; I hope the lawsuit succeeds. But in this state success on the part of the suit is highly unlikely.
"Let's throw out the legislature, and put every issue to a vote of the people. "

"This is a REPUBLIC, if you can keep it" Ben Franklin

Your point on "The problem with this suggestion, of course, is that we would have time to do nothing but vote 24 hours a day." is well received & spot-on.

" This is an onerous and invasive piece of legislation for any woman wishing to obtain an abortion (which is her legal right ..."

Ok.

Weak case-law agrees w/you; but there is 0 codified law (as is the NORM in a Republic to be followed, as no new law should EVER be "judge made law"!)

Hope you enjoy this wonderful day, realizing that your parents were OBVIOUSLY not "choicers"!
Well then

Bixby, OK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#21
Oct 2, 2009
 

Judged:

2

2

1

I read a refreshing article today...

Popular support for abortion rights has dropped seven points in the past year due in part to the election of a pro-choice Democratic president, the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life said Thursday.

In the largest shift in sentiment since pollsters began asking about the topic in 1995, support dropped from 54 to 47 percent in one year. Opposition rose from 40 to 44 percent and the percentage of undecided rose from 6 to 9 percent.

"It's pretty unusual," senior Pew researcher Greg Smith said of the change in public attitudes about abortion rights." In 2007 and 2008, supporters of abortion clearly outnumbered opponents by a 14-point margin. Now the margin is 3 percent. Basically, they are evenly divided."

Pew's findings square with a similar Gallup Values and Beliefs survey in May that showed more Americans consider themselves to be pro-life (51 percent) than pro-choice (42 percent).

They also square with a Pew survey released in May showing an even larger drop of 8 percentage points - 54 to 46 percent since August 2008 - of abortion rights advocates. The biggest drops in support were among white mainline Protestants and men. Approval among both groups fell by 10 percent.

Click here to read the full story at the Washington Times.
Legal Czar

Tulsa, OK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#22
Oct 2, 2009
 

Judged:

1

1

shovelhead72 wrote:
<quoted text>
Just out of curiosity, where do you stand on the death penalty? According to the standard you have set forth here, the state has been committing murder ever since the death penalty statute became law. Doctors guilty of malpractice, in cases where the patient dies under their care, should be prosecuted for murder under these guidelines. Where does this end?
Death penalty = any eye for an eye; the unwarranted/wanton taking of another human's life has NEVER been sanctioned in any society, now has it? The death penalty is society's way of deterring murder.

un·war·rant·ed (n-wôrn-td,-wr-)
adj.
Having no justification; groundless:

unwarranted -
Adjective
not justified or necessary

Does Abortion on demand (not including rape/incest/mothers life issues, which make up >5% of ALL abortions) not fall under "unwarranted" by definition?

Hhhmmmmmmmmm.

Since when did the baby "offend" that standard?! Pray, do tell.

"Doctors guilty of malpractice, in cases where the patient dies under their care, should be prosecuted for murder under these guidelines."

They DO get sued for that; I have attorney friends who specialize in that field.

"Where does this end?" When people take responsibility for their CHOICES before conception, my fellow biker!

(assuming you OWN a Harley, as your "screen name" would indicate ... BTW: What Year? Mine's an '81 shovelhead.)
Legal Czar

Tulsa, OK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#23
Oct 2, 2009
 

Judged:

1

1

shovelhead72 wrote:
<quoted text>
The only type of birth control available for free at the Health Department is condoms. Birth control pills must be prescribed by a physician. They are never "free". In addition, some women incur serious health risks from taking bc pills. These women are prescribed, and fitted with, a diaphragm or IUD. This procedure is never "free" either.
Good points.

Wait ... we agree?

LOL

BTW: The "choice" of Abstinence is still FREE.
Would you like us to alert you when someone adds a comment?
(registration is not required)
Showing posts 1 - 20 of506
< prev page
|
Go to last post| Jump to page:
Type in your comments to post to the forum
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Cars [ See all ]

Moore Jobs

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
Apartments [ See all ]
Moore Dating

more search filters

less search filters

Moore People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Moore News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Moore

Daily Horoscope for December 24

Cancer

Take things gently otherwise you'll end up running round in ever-decreasing circles. Yes, you may still have a lot to do but you won't achieve very much if you develop butterfingers or waste all your energy on a full-blown panic. Maybe you could rope someone into helping you, rather than doing your Cinderella act in the kitchen while everyone else takes it easy?

Get your Horoscope »