McGreevey's ex-wife Dina Matos comes out against gay marriage

I guess she wants everyone else to marry closeted gay men like she did. Why would you want them to marry each other when they can pretend to be straight and marry women!!!!

Barry wrote:

I guess she wants everyone else to marry closeted gay men like she did. Why would you want them to marry each other when they can pretend to be straight and marry women!!!!

...and destroy both their lives in the process. I recently downloaded a study from the web site of the APA regarding the true sexual orientation of homophobic men. It showed that nearly all exhibited arousal when shown homo-erotic pictures despite all their insistence of being heterosexual. I haven't seen any similar study of homophobic women but just imagine what living with her, as a closeted gay man, might be like. She already knows what living with a closeted gay man is like and, yet, she hasn't learned anything from it.

“We have the civil union law in place, which I think is wonderful,” Matos said.

Of COURSE she would think it's "wonderful". It doesn't APPLY to her!

Why, I wonder, does anyone give a hoot what this woman has to say? Isn't the issue complex enough without giving news space to the ramblings of an idiot?

Thats because she isnt worth a damn and she know it now.. she's worthless property.

She was raised a Catholic.... B.S.!!! Well, based on the Catholic teachings, married couples should not divorce. So, for as long as you are a man and a woman, you can divorce and marry as many as you can??? That is this tormented woman's definition of traditional marriage and being a Catholic.

Dina is being vindictive. She is being VERY INAPPROPRIATE (lol. sound familiar?)! Wouldn't recognition of same-sex marriage prevent more men from feeling forced to marry the opposite gender for social acceptance therefore decreasing her chances of marrying another closeted gay man?

Dina, just because your husband was an unscrupulous jerk doesn't mean you should want the whole gay community punished with denial of equality.

Does the former Mrs. McGreevey know the difference between CIVIL and RELIGIOUS marriage?

Oh, and you all are high and mighty because you have walked in her shoes..and seen the pain that her innocent child had to endure...and will have to endure in the future.

Do any of you ever respond by first thinking...you know, something intelligent and decent people try to do before ripping the head and heart off of people they never met.

And you wonder why we have so many bully kids...gee, ya think it might be from their parents??????

Sir Andrew wrote:

Why, I wonder, does anyone give a hoot what this woman has to say? Isn't the issue complex enough without giving news space to the ramblings of an idiot?

No, it's not comples at all. It's about JUSTICE.

Which part of that word do you not understands ?

Mary K wrote:

Oh, and you all are high and mighty because you have walked in her shoes..and seen the pain that her innocent child had to endure...and will have to endure in the future.
Do any of you ever respond by first thinking...you know, something intelligent and decent people try to do before ripping the head and heart off of people they never met.
And you wonder why we have so many bully kids...gee, ya think it might be from their parents??????

And by what logic would you say she is justified in opposing marriage for one group of people just because of what her husband did to her?

It's a shame that so many gay and lesbian people marry str8 people. It seems to be a very common thing.