Who do you support for U.S. Senate in New York in 2010?

Biden That wrote:

<quoted text> Pray to Obama for a remedial special ed. English course to teach the difference between gone and went, as in Obama will be gone in January, and Obama went back to Chicago after losing the election; in January, you will say, "Obama has gone back to Chicago." Also, pray to Obama quickly, as your ignorance has NOT GONE; it is creating Obamanistic Wrightisms, one of the dreaded diseases caused by over-worship of false idols, such as Obama and John/Geoff. It occurs mainly in lowlife ghettos in Massena and Binghamton.

You people need some SERIOUS help. I find it terrifying to contemplate that you guys will be helping to elect the next leader of the free world.

to your ass,sorry my views are not in harmony with yours.but i am a vet and proud of it.just because you disagree with me,doesn't mean i didn't spend 70-71 in that paradise called S.Viet-Nam,sorry about that.

Please vote for obama this nov..romney is wrong for america and will do it great harm.

I seond what teddy said.i voted for obama in 2008 and will do so again this coming Nov.please send him a donation.

I 3rd that.Obama is doing a great job.Glad i supported hom in 2008,will do so again in Nov.Please show your support by sending him a check to helps re-election,i know i have.

again i'd like to apologize for my preceeding remark.it's been a roller coaster ride with my anti-psych meds.again to show how sorry i am.i'm sending 50 dollars to help re-elect obama.would you please help me and do the same?

sorry for the mistake,i even spelled my own post name wrong.again please supprt pres. obama

none!

I haven't been feeling like my old self,since yesterday,when in a moment of anger,with someone who dared to disagree i let slip the fact that i think nam draftees were trash.i don't feel bad that i think this way,i feel bad that people now know the depth of my distain for those to poor to avoid getting drafted and sent to nam.

My meds are doing it again.Damn they make me look stupid.Oh well,back to looking down my nose at the little people,or better yet trashing former draftees.I wonder what the rules are in an online disagreement?Does only one side get to decide what the code of conduct is,or is the other side allowed to put in his 2cents?Is posting under anothers name really any different then posting and making the name look almost like anothers?Do i get to call people fools or idiots and expect them to throw praise my way?When i call people that were drafted during the Viet-Nam war trash,do i act surprised when they react.?It's a tough question.

Maybe if people wouldn't be so quick to enage in name calling when somone disagrees with them,the internet would be a better place to discuss things.But people are to quick to call others names,that they wouldn't say in person.It's called the courage of the anonomous.As for myself I have had enough of topix and will not be back.So go back to trashing vets and any others who disagree.

De Oppresso Liber wrote:

My meds are doing it again.Damn they make me look stupid.Oh well,back to looking down my nose at the little people,or better yet trashing former draftees.I wonder what the rules are in an online disagreement?Does only one side get to decide what the code of conduct is,or is the other side allowed to put in his 2cents?Is posting under anothers name really any different then posting and making the name look almost like anothers?Do i get to call people fools or idiots and expect them to throw praise my way?When i call people that were drafted during the Viet-Nam war trash,do i act surprised when they react.?It's a tough question.

Of course only one side gets to decide the code of conduct, and when you pay your fair share, you will, too! Pay your taxes; Massena ObamaFailure is alive, but not well!

civilityisnice wrote:

Maybe if people wouldn't be so quick to enage in name calling when somone disagrees with them,the internet would be a better place to discuss things.But people are to quick to call others names,that they wouldn't say in person.It's called the courage of the anonomous.As for myself I have had enough of topix and will not be back.So go back to trashing vets and any others who disagree.

anonomous ... LOL ... You mean obscurejude, xuan loc, mad dog uni, mos35charlie, and leftwinger and proud ... all one of you ... are threatening to go bye-bye, yet again!!!...Bwhahahahahahahahah aha ... Massena ObamaFailure!

Pray my family doesn't find all my child pornography after I die.

Biden That wrote:

Pray my family doesn't find all my child pornography after I die.

Imagine the Binghamton imposter John/Geoff making false allegations of child porn; the Binghamton imposter John/Geoff must be a convicted child porn felon. Pray to Obama for your immediate incarceration! Binghamton John/Geoff ObamaFailure!

Peace

Romney 2012

Anyone who supports that lightweight Gillibrand can go to hell.

This should increase ridership for Buses and Trains:

NEW YORK (CBSNewYork)— A legal fight over freedom of speech is spilling into New York’s subway tunnels. A sign about “Jihad” is set to debut next week. The Metropolitan Transportation Authority says it crosses the line, but a judge disagrees.

WCBS 880&#8242;s Paul Murnane On The Story

On the region’s subways and buses, most ads we see don’t get much attention. But that may change with a pro-Israel ad that will soon grace MTA property which reads:“In any war between the civilized man and the savage, support the civilized man. Support Israel. Defeat jihad.”

The ad is a clear swipe against radical Muslims.

“It’s going to create problems for no reason, you know?” Maguid El Ghazzawi of Astoria told CBS 2’s Sean Hennessey on Wednesday night.

At a Manhattan Mosque, not all were pleased with the fact the ad will soon go public.

“It is negative, not positive,” Harlem’s Abdus Khan said.

“I think it is something stupid. For somebody they are very ignorant,” El Ghazzawi said.

For almost a year, the MTA fought the running of the ad, saying the words “savage” and “jihad” demean a group, but in the lawsuit a federal judge ruled that barring the ad violated the First Amendment and the “….fundamental importance of the free flow of ideas…”

“What the court said,‘no demeaning’ is too general a phrase,” said Leon Friedman, a constitutional law expert at Hofstra University.“Government just can’t say ‘I like this ad, I don’t like that ad.’ They just can’t do that.”

While the MTA said its hands are tied, the ad’s sponsor celebrated the victory.

“Political speech is the most protected speech,” said Pamela Geller of the American Freedom Defense Initiative.

Geller said the ad isn’t anti-Muslim, but a response to an anti-Israeli ad the MTA ran last year.

I think the special man in my life, PP, would do GReat. If only the other PP would leave the "race".