What drives our genes? Researchers map the first complete human epigenome

Divine Alien wrote:

Definitely, it's not a car engine or steam engine or locomotive engine or rocket engine etc..

Noodly James wrote:

Well, I basically put up interesting research which may be only quasi related to evolution so that people (especially the drive by's ) can find it easily.(I also post the same stories in the science, biology, and paleontology forums in an attempt to pull scientists to the forum.)
-
The topics typically get saved and used as fodder against the common enemy.

Lil Ticked wrote:

<quoted text>good luck with that.

Noodly James wrote:

Well, I basically put up interesting research which may be only quasi related to evolution so that people (especially the drive by's ) can find it easily.(I also post the same stories in the science, biology, and paleontology forums in an attempt to pull scientists to the forum.)

Noodly James wrote:

<quoted text>
Gee thanks!!!!

just an allusion wrote:

<quoted text>
And yet it is that I have, on more than one occasion, demonstrated that you do not know a damn thing about that which you profess to be so fluent in, be it on the subject of "science, biology [or] paleontology"...Imagine THAT!
So is it that you just wish to pick the minds of ACTUAL scientists, biologists &/or paleontologists for your own personal gain, or is it that you have an as of yet unrealized desire to prove just how big of an idiot you are? Seriously!

Kong_ wrote:

<quoted text>
This is absolute horsecrap.
But just to humor you.....what IS the Theory of "Intelligent Design"?

just an allusion wrote:

<quoted text>
You, Kong, I've demonstrated to be one of the most idiotic, so why do you insist on badgering me? Haven't you had enough already?
Look, I'm not trying to bash on either you or 'noodly', I just do not appreciate people that profess to be knowledgeable on a given subject only to then be proven that they do not know jackshit about it and are only talking out of their arses.
Tell you what though, you open an thread on a topic that you are actually literate in and I will come along and engage in a lively discussion with you on it, if it is in my ability to do so,but please, PLEASE, stop engaging in conversations about which you know little at best while all the while erroneously professing to be quite knowledgeable...It doesn't do anything for your credibility and is as embarrassing for me as it is for you.

just an allusion wrote:

<quoted text>
You, Kong, I've demonstrated to be one of the most idiotic, so why do you insist on badgering me? Haven't you had enough already?
Look, I'm not trying to bash on either you or 'noodly', I just do not appreciate people that profess to be knowledgeable on a given subject only to then be proven that they do not know jackshit about it and are only talking out of their arses.
Tell you what though, you open an thread on a topic that you are actually literate in and I will come along and engage in a lively discussion with you on it, if it is in my ability to do so,but please, PLEASE, stop engaging in conversations about which you know little at best while all the while erroneously professing to be quite knowledgeable...It doesn't do anything for your credibility and is as embarrassing for me as it is for you.

Kong_ wrote:

<quoted text>
..........
And where specifically have you shown me to be "the most idiotic"?
..........

Kong_ wrote:

<quoted text>
And where specifically have you shown me to be "the most idiotic"?

just an allusion wrote:

<quoted text>
...So is it that you just wish to pick the minds of ACTUAL scientists, biologists &/or paleontologists for your own personal gain, or is it that you have an as of yet unrealized desire to prove just how big of an idiot you are? Seriously!