Obama: US has 'very good' intelligence on Iran

http://news.yahoo.com/obama-us-very-good-inte...

Would this be the same as the "very good intelligence" the US had on Iraq and the WMD's or perhaps the "very good intelligence" the US had on the location of Osama Bin Laden for like, 9 years?

cantmakeitup wrote:

Would this be the same as the "very good intelligence" the US had on Iraq and the WMD's or perhaps the "very good intelligence" the US had on the location of Osama Bin Laden for like, 9 years?

I'm thinking that depends on what Obama decides next. However, that is exactly what I thought of too after reading the story!

Trolls <quoted text>
I have probably lied thousands of times in my life, care to elaborate on which one you are talking about?

HORSES "MOUTH" LMAOROTF !

The seattle psycho is just begging for attention haha

The Saint Paul putz, thinks name calling is an important part of your daily regiment, as you LIE your way to (NEVER) being an adult.

I just crapped in my pants.

We know john, we see the IP and juvenile announcements are so YOU !

Again, I have nothing better to do but sit at my keyboard and act juvenile. The subject matter doesn't matter as long as I can pick on soneone.

(soneone) Yeah, until I get a fish on, I can "pick" on morons, boi.

(soneone) Hmmm ? Which would make your efforts REALLY amusing ! LMAOROTF ! I'm sorry I have time while fishing, is my time your business ? As for the subject matter, Glad to see you picked ME ! LMAOROTF !

I just crapped in my pants again.

Why is everyone ignoring me?

Mommy? Mommy?

The only "intelligence"
O-Bomb-ya has on Iran is what the chickenhawk warmongers and neocons tell him. The CIA's National Intelligence Estimate ("NIE") has found no evidence of Iranian nuclear weapons. Several ex-chiefs of Israel's Mossad are against attacking Iran.

The GOP candidates Gingrich, Santorum, and Romney are scumbag chickenhawks. Support Ron Paul.

If someone else started disclosing our foreign intelligence strengths and weaknesses, they could be charged with treason.

Keep your cards down.

Seattle Slew wrote:

I just crapped in my pants again.
Why is everyone ignoring me?
Mommy? Mommy?

We know, but you're a poser wannabee, from the wrong IP, boi. I own a "little man's" head ! LMAOROTF !

WISH I had some intelligence , anyone know where I can get some?

If for no other reason, this man needs to be replaced for allowing US policy to be spoken by him on a Regular Basis.

"Commander-in-Chief" implies that "he" is in command, not subjegated to the assorted "Victim Groups" that are represented within his Admainistration!

Consistent wrote:

If for no other reason, this man needs to be replaced for allowing US policy to be spoken by him on a Regular Basis.
"Commander-in-Chief" implies that "he" is in command, not subjegated to the assorted "Victim Groups" that are represented within his Admainistration!

(subjected administration)Are you drinking again !? How's the Antabuse working ?(Ps. Fyi. The "victim group" from a welfare, drunk bum...not working for ya...)

Thank you Mr President for doing the such a great job on fighting terror.

Dick Cheney and I were too busy fighting the more important things like gay marruage to worry ourselves with terror.

Thanks again.

GW

Seattle Slew wrote:

I just crapped in my pants again.
Why is everyone ignoring me?
Mommy? Mommy?

Go back to Walgreens and double your dosage.....