Amy Senser Walks

JTY wrote:

<quoted text>
He had cocaine in his system, they are going to do whatever they can to plant reasonable doubt.

There was a legal "expert" on KFAN yesterday, he said that whether or not the victim was under the influence has no bearing on the legal case. It does, however, have bearing on the civil case. So they didn't really need to bring it up now. Her current LEGAL charges won't be changed by him being/not being under the influence.

Wade Gustafson wrote:

<quoted text>
Are you trying to say it was a Senser daughter that hit and killed that man and her mother is taking the fall?

I am reading it as him saying that Amy hit him and then 40 min later her daughter (who did not have a driver's license btw) went back to the accident scene.

Trolls wrote:

<quoted text>
There was a legal "expert" on KFAN yesterday, he said that whether or not the victim was under the influence has no bearing on the legal case. It does, however, have bearing on the civil case. So they didn't really need to bring it up now. Her current LEGAL charges won't be changed by him being/not being under the influence.

Her civil case is already underway as well.

JTY wrote:

<quoted text>
Her civil case is already underway as well.

Didn't realize that, interesting.

Remember when I offered you 10k per kid in scholarship money, to show proof you "claimed" you had ? Remember you tried to ignore the offer, because you're a POS liar ??? Good times, huh ???

Trolls wrote:

<quoted text>
Didn't realize that, interesting.

It started almost immediately after she admitted it, but then it was put on hold for four months. It has just restarted.

JTY wrote:

<quoted text>
He had cocaine in his system, they are going to do whatever they can to plant reasonable doubt.

That's right. Wrong place at the wrong tims. If he wasn't drugged up he might have noticed the gas gauge.

JTY wrote:

<quoted text>
It started almost immediately after she admitted it, but then it was put on hold for four months. It has just restarted.

So what's you best guess to the outcome? Is she going to pull an OJ and be found not guilty legally, but pay millions for the civil case?

Trolls wrote:

<quoted text>
So what's you best guess to the outcome? Is she going to pull an OJ and be found not guilty legally, but pay millions for the civil case?

My guess is that the world will end in December 2012 and we will never know the outcome.

If as a motorist you hit and kill a pedestrian, unless you the driver are drunk or otherwise under an influence or have broken a traffic law like running a red light, will not be found guilty of anything.

If the pedestrian was at all at fault and the driver broke no law there will be no charges against the driver and of course the pedestrian being dead would not be charged.

In this case whomever the driver of the Sensor vehicle was in all probability was driving illegally and would have been charged for their illegal driving activity. Once charged they would have been more suceptable to losing a court battle civil or crimminal.

However the Sensors rallyed around the driver and did the smart thing, called a lawyer. The lawyer was a good one and suggested the plan of attack, eliminate evidence of wrong doing and then admit to hitting something, not knowing the object hit was a human.

The evidence of wrong doing was perhaps a drunk driver, confusing stories from the alledged driver, witness gathering and story development etc.

All I can say is that if I were driving illegally and hit a pedestrian I would drive home conceal my vehicle and call the attorney the Sensors used.

When you consider all the cases of hit and run with fatalities or serious injuries just think of the potential for reduced punishment for the violators.

This case is another good example of how the wealthy are able to manipulate our legal system and skate away with no or reduced punishment that a poor person would be locked up for a long time.

BTW, the rich also can pay for the use of the MnPASS lanes, you poor suckers can sit in traffic, LOL.