Gingrich Blasts Obama's Birth Control Policy as 'Outrageous Assault' on Religion

Judged:

7

6

5

cantmakeitup wrote:

<quoted text>
Really?? A fetus and a bag of flower? That that might just be the worst comparison I have ever seen.

Judged:

3

3

3

Seattle Slew wrote:

<quoted text>The comparison was fine. If something has potential to become something, it isn't "IT", until proper steps are taken and conditions are made. If you'd like to present a better comparison, fine...Otherwise you're showing a BIAS, without presenting ANYTHING of value... Again, you "can" be/do better.

Judged:

7

5

4

cantmakeitup wrote:

<quoted text>
So can you. Comparing a living organism to a bag of flower is ridiculous. But to use your analogy, egg and sperm would be equivalent to your flower and water and yeast. Once they meet up, you have a living organism that begins cell division. The beginning of potential. It could potentially abort spontaneously, it could potentially divide and become two or more organisms, it could potentially mutate and become a 12 toed fetus. But once conception takes place, the process begins and there is always potential.

Judged:

7

5

4

Say What wrote:

<quoted text>So you have nothing to add except a tactic that democrats are well aquainted with when talking about GWB? And let me point out that I did not vote for him either time.

Judged:

1

Miz Airy wrote:

<quoted text>
That doesn't answer my question, and I didn't say it was OK. And why is it OK for those who have no children to pay for public schools? Those who don't drive pay for roads?We ALL pay for something we don't want to.
Those who accept public funds in any form can't have it both ways. If they're dumb enough to accept public money, they are going to be dictated by the government how to utilize those funds. Religious organizations walk up to Uncle Sam with their hand out shouldn't be shocked or surprised when an administration such as the current one bullies them into throwing away their principles. Stop taking public money, and they can do with their private money as they please.
Unless it's as I asked to begin with: does this apply only to those organizations that accept public money, or all religious organizations? With all the articles I've read on this, I can't seem to get that answer.

Judged:

3

2

2

woodtick57 wrote:

<quoted text>Hardly. not a liberal and not a baby unless it has a place to grow.

Judged:

1

1

1

Casey wrote:

<quoted text>
With all due respect: by voting for Wellstone because of his environmental stance you put that above your religious stance, making you the "Buffet Catholic" I mentioned. I don't have a dog in the race so I can't congratulate you on your "come to Jesus moment." I gave up the Catholic thing when I was in my teens and haven't looked back.

Judged:

4

3

2

Say What wrote:

<quoted text>Not a liberal?!?! Please, you're just fooling yourself. It's time for you to come out of the closet. Political and otherwise.

Judged:

4

4

2

Say What wrote:

<quoted text>This Catholic begs to differ. Yes, I did vote for Wellstone the first time he ran. This was mostly based on his enviromental stance. But after that I re-learned a lesson I apparently forgot. Never trust a politician, but NEVER trust a politician that's a democrat.
I should clarify that I'm not a registered Republican. But I do consider myself as a conservitive.

Snake Dr wrote:

<quoted text>
i agree with you i bet he caves in. too bad he should stand his ground.

Judged:

1

1

1

Say What wrote:

<quoted text>It appears that you're trying to compare education, ect., to the taking of a life. An innocent life to boot.
As far as walking up with their hands out, do you have any idea of all the goodwill and charity, that the Catholic Church provides to those in need? Did you know, for example, that the Mayo clinic was started by Catholic nuns? The list goes on and on.
I bring up the Catholic faith first and foremost because the "Yes we can" administration has most assuredly set their sights on us. But I'm fairly sure it isn't limited to just us. I think the Muslims are free and clear though. One only has to recall the outcry from the liberal camp when they, the Muslims, wanted to build a "recreation center" near the site of the twin towers.
Now please note the total and complete lack of support from these same fine, upstanding citizens when Christianity is under attack. Again.
I hope I've answered your question.

Seatle SLEW wrote:

I really like Newt's "virginity reward program" for high school girls, wonder why it doesn't apply to guys NAILING THE TEACHER ??? WHAT A HYPOCRITE ! Probably setting up a "back-up job", if the presidential thingy doesn't work out.... or perhaps HIS NEXT AFFAIR !??
WHO PICKED THESE IDIOTS !??

Judged:

1

Say What wrote:

<quoted text> If you put any faith in anything these Republicans are spewing out to try and get elected, you would be a fool.

Judged:

2

2

2

Miz Airy wrote:

<quoted text>
Do you always deliberately miss the point or are you that dense? I'm not comparing education to taking a life. As I clearly explained in the post you are responding to there are ALWAYS going issues we don't believe we should have to pay for.
And to your point of all of that wonderful charity Catholic's give, if it's government, which was my point, how is that the Catholic's charity? That's MY charity if it's used with tax dollars. And, that brings me back to my original point: If public money isn't accepted to begin with, they don't have to be dictated to on how to use. As the saying goes, if you dance with the devil, expect to get burned.

Judged:

1

1

1

OCCU_PUPPY wrote:

Mr. What, please except my invitation to join my boycott of Topix this Wednesday to protest the virus from Seattle.
Seems to me you did nothing to offend her, yet she attacks you.