California faces more serious risk of sea level rise than other areas

There's some GOOD news to be gotten from this report. If these projections are correct, our great grand-children will live in a world where Marin City is underneath 10 feet of water, part of the bay.

Also, the Canal. I would imagine.

GREAT news.

Professor Steve wrote:

There's some GOOD news to be gotten from this report.

I'm not an English professor.

Professor Steve wrote:

There's some GOOD news to be gotten from this report. If these projections are correct, our great grand-children will live in a world where Marin City is underneath 10 feet of water, part of the bay.

This shit we post here on the internet is going to stay on here forever. Or at least until mankind is overtaken and ruled by apes. Who will then destroy all of mankinds' technology. As predicted in the movie "The Planet of the Apes". But, if you're reading this in, say, the year 3012, before that happens, you can tell me. Was I right? Or, was I right?

Professor Steve wrote:

<quoted text> Was I right? Or, was I right?

Well, I've been dead for at least fifty years now, so it really aint no thang. All I'm sayin...

Hey, one thing I DID want to ask you Future Dwellers. Did Jim Nabors ever do a follow up album to his last one, "Jim Nabors Sings Some Gospel"? Man, I love...I mean loved...that guy...

I'm glad we have the chance to have this serious conversation about the upcoming sea level rise.

Professor Steve wrote:

There's some GOOD news to be gotten from this report. If these projections are correct, our great grand-children will live in a world where Marin City is underneath 10 feet of water, part of the bay.

won't that make property that is the new beach front more valuabl

Professor Steve wrote:

I'm glad we have the chance to have this serious conversation about the upcoming sea level rise.

Hi Ricky.

The revolutionaries *(now in power)* lack moral authority. This is just another of their attempts to incite hysteria among the public for the purpose of distracting attention away from their failed 60s 70s era social and economic programs.

Ronald

Commander Bunny wrote:

<quoted text>Hi Ricky.

Huh. Uh, how could you tell?

Yep yep yep.

RICKY RAT wrote:

Yep yep yep.

Gloop.

Professor Steve wrote:

<quoted text> But, if you're reading this in, say, the year 3012, before that happens, you can tell me. Was I right? Or, was I right?

Clearly, I'm no math professor, either. Because 3012 would be a THOUSAND years down the road. What I MEANT was 2112. A hundred years from now.

Professor Steve wrote:

<quoted text>Clearly, I'm no math professor, either. Because 3012 would be a THOUSAND years down the road. What I MEANT was 2112. A hundred years from now.

Time is the Great Equalizer. By the year 2112, most of us will be dead. But, if somehow you've managed to make it that far, and I don't care how fricken BEE UTE IF UL you were at one time, by the year 2112, you'll be a little, shriveled-up, wrinkly old fart.

Professor Steve wrote:

<quoted text> by the year 2112, you'll be a little, shriveled-up, wrinkly old fart.

According to my calculations.

Professor Steve wrote:

<quoted text>Time is the Great Equalizer. By the year 2112, most of us will be dead. But, if somehow you've managed to make it that far, and I don't care how fricken BEE UTE IF UL you were at one time, by the year 2112, you'll be a little, shriveled-up, wrinkly old fart.

You ever been to one of them old folks' homes'? There aint no BEE UTE IF UL peoples' sections in them old folks' homes...

There's just the little, shriveled-up, wrinkly old fart section...

Professor Steve aint no BEE UTE IF UL peoples, in case you were wondering...