'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate

Still waiting ;_-)

More proof BHO is not the one to lead us to prosperity. 522,000 leave the job market, with only 115,000 new jobs in April. The WH will tout the 8.1% unemployment rate, but with a real rate of 14.5% of potential job seekers unemployed it is an ongoing problem for the president. No wonder he is shucking & jiving with things like the college loan rate to distract from real issues like jobs.

Aristocles son of Ariston wrote:

<quoted text>
I'll vote for a "moromney" over a "InsaneHussein" any day!
I think hindsight is 20/20. so America will not be hearded like sheeple again.

"hearded" like sheeple

lmfao

You illiterate SOB.

its the economy stupid wrote:

More proof BHO is not the one to lead us to prosperity. 522,000 leave the job market, with only 115,000 new jobs in April. The WH will tout the 8.1% unemployment rate, but with a real rate of 14.5% of potential job seekers unemployed it is an ongoing problem for the president. No wonder he is shucking & jiving with things like the college loan rate to distract from real issues like jobs.

Romney made a living for 25 years shipping jobs to China and India.

He will do great!

lmfao

You dumbass.

Cornelius Scudmister wrote:

Still waiting ;_-)

...stand on one foot, then hold your breath 8-)

"Released" means "Released" Beta is another issue!

but I guess you made a mistake, It's understandable that the "Business Owner" which would support Obama and his team of Chicago Style Crooks would make a lot of mistakes...in judgement and in life!

wtf wrote:

<quoted text>"hearded" like sheeple
lmfao
You illiterate SOB.

Not perfect...human!
You pathetic, pedantic, puke!

CaptainObvious1 wrote:

<quoted text>
...stand on one foot, then hold your breath 8-)
"Released" means "Released" Beta is another issue!
but I guess you made a mistake, It's understandable that the "Business Owner" which would support Obama and his team of Chicago Style Crooks would make a lot of mistakes...in judgement and in life!

Anybody that would support Romney is for more jobs in China and Swiss Bank Accounts.

CaptainObvious1 wrote:

<quoted text>
...stand on one foot, then hold your breath 8-)
"Released" means "Released" Beta is another issue!
but I guess you made a mistake, It's understandable that the "Business Owner" which would support Obama and his team of Chicago Style Crooks would make a lot of mistakes...in judgement and in life!

I made no mistakes. Stop trying to squirm around language stupid. I said what I meant and meant what I said. It is not my fault you are too stupid to understand English,
LOL Nobody expected the screenshot, didn't for a minute think you really had it :-P

Cornelius Scudmister wrote:

Still waiting ;_-)

Of the IT related businesses with a physical location of newport...
one name (male) keeps popping up.
This person wrote a wordpressblog about "Google Search history on Google Apps", would this be you C.S.?

Where the LLEH did you ever come up with a pseudonym like Cornellius Scudmister?

CaptainObvious1 wrote:

<quoted text>
Of the IT related businesses with a physical location of newport...
one name (male) keeps popping up.
This person wrote a wordpressblog about "Google Search history on Google Apps", would this be you C.S.?
Where the LLEH did you ever come up with a pseudonym like Cornellius Scudmister?

No that wouldn't be me. I am from Newport and still live in the area, but neither I nor my business is located in Newport proper.
I cannot get too specific as my business is unique in this part of the country. If I say specifically what I do it wouldn't be hard to figure out who I am. Not a smart business move to let your politics be publicly known.
As for the name, it just came to me. Perhaps I saw it, or something simmular somewhere and it embedded in my subconscious.

Cornelius Scudmister wrote:

<quoted text>
No that wouldn't be me. I am from Newport and still live in the area, but neither I nor my business is located in Newport proper.
I cannot get too specific as my business is unique in this part of the country. If I say specifically what I do it wouldn't be hard to figure out who I am. Not a smart business move to let your politics be publicly known.
As for the name, it just came to me. Perhaps I saw it, or something simmular somewhere and it embedded in my subconscious.

I said this before...about your politics, and your argument was different then!

If you realise that it would be detrimental...don't you think you should revisit those ideas you have about Obama's effect on business and the economy?

If 90% of business is Anti-anything...you should consider those opinions carefully...don't you think?; at least for the sake of your business.

WorldNetDaily Exclusive
'Natural-born citizen' info vanishes off Wikipedia
In wake of Obama's release of his long-form birth certificate
Published: 05/01/2011 at 5:45 PM [LAST YEAR:al]

Reference to a key source cited by Founding Fathers in their development of the constitutional qualifications for the presidency is missing from Wikipedia’s entry on “natural-born citizenship” in the wake of Barack Obama’s release of his long-form birth certificate.

Blogger Paul Smith points out that reference to the Swiss legal philosopher Emmerich de Vattel and his seminal definition of natural-born citizenship can no longer be found in the Wikipedia entry.

De Vattel defined natural-born citizenship in this 1757 treatise “The Law of Nations” as “those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.”

The definition is relevant to President Obama’s eligibility, because while his publicized birth certificate indicates he was born in the United States, it also shows that his father was Barack Obama Sr., a non-immigrant foreign student whose citizenship was Kenyan.

Screen capture of reference to de Vattel in Wikipedia entry April 10, via the Wayback Machine

De Vattel’s definition and the reliance on his work by Founding Fathers such as George Washington and Benjamin Franklin are crucial because the Constitution does not define natural-born citizenship, and the Supreme Court has not given Congress an authoritative definition with which to work.

Scholars generally agree that a natural-born citizen must be born of two U.S. citizens, but there is division over whether a person must also be born on U.S. soil. According to either definition, Barack Obama would not qualify.

(Story continues below)

The Founders were concerned that a president born of a foreigner might have divided loyalties.

De Vattel explained that “it is necessary to be born of a person who is a citizen, for if he be born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country.”

Screen capture of Wikipedia entry’s treatment of the case United States v. Wong Kim Ark, April 29, which no longer cites de Vattel.

A capture of the Wikipedia “Natural born citizen of the United States” entry by the Wayback Machine, which archives website pages at various points in time, shows a reference to de Vattel on April 10 in an account of the court case United States v. Wong Kim Ark.

In the current version, the reference in the text and two citations at the bottom are missing.

Wikipedia, however, has a separate entry for de Vattel that features his definition of “natural born citizen” from “The Law of Nations.”

THE BIG
LIST of eligibility ‘proofers’

THE FULL
STORY: See listing of hundreds of exclusive WND reports on the eligibility
issue

http://www.wnd.com/2011/05/293069/

Cornelius Scudmister wrote:

<quoted text>
No that wouldn't be me. I am from Newport and still live in the area, but neither I nor my business is located in Newport proper.
I cannot get too specific as my business is unique in this part of the country. If I say specifically what I do it wouldn't be hard to figure out who I am. Not a smart business move to let your politics be publicly known.
As for the name, it just came to me. Perhaps I saw it, or something simmular somewhere and it embedded in my subconscious.

Are you a "Nerd"?

Aristocles son of Ariston wrote:

<quoted text>
I said this before...about your politics, and your argument was different then!
If you realise that it would be detrimental...don't you think you should revisit those ideas you have about Obama's effect on business and the economy?
If 90% of business is Anti-anything...you should consider those opinions carefully...don't you think?; at least for the sake of your business.

Two BIG ""if"s there.
1. It is bad business either party (I have both democrat and republican customers)
2. The 90% claim you make has not been my experience.

Aristocles son of Ariston wrote:

<quoted text>
Are you a "Nerd"?

That would depend on your definition.
If you mean am I like the guys on The Big Bang Theory, I would have to say no.
If on the other hand you mean someone who has been highly involved with computer technology since childhood then yes, I am a nerd.

Aristocles son of Ariston wrote:

<quoted text>
Are you a "Nerd"?

Nahhhh. He's a NERDY "dwidioT"......;-)

Cornelius Scudmister wrote:

<quoted text>
That would depend on your definition.
If you mean am I like the guys on The Big Bang Theory, I would have to say no.
If on the other hand you mean someone who has been highly involved with computer technology since childhood then yes, I am a nerd.

Hasn't DONE you ANY good, for the REAL world!...;-)

American Lady wrote:

<quoted text>
Hasn't DONE you ANY good, for the REAL world!...;-)

I own a successful business, make what most would consider a very good living, have a nice home and a beautiful, happy family.
I've done okay for myself.

wtf wrote:

<quoted text>Romney made a living for 25 years shipping jobs to China and India.
He will do great!
lmfao
You dumbass.

Typical wtf stupidity, make a wild unsubstantiated claim and then name call. The figures speak for themselves and it is interesting that you don't even try to dispell the numbers.

Cornelius Scudmister wrote:

<quoted text>
I own a successful business, make what most would consider a very good living, have a nice home and a beautiful, happy family.
I've done okay for myself.

By the Grace of God......
NOT from "intelligence" re commonsense....;-)