Who do you support for U.S. Senate in North Carolina in 2010?

Arnold-Ziffel wrote:

<quoted text>
I can only wish that it would have been you displaced from your home, and you know what? You may just get your chance someday. You would be the first to be screaming to high heaven about your government benefits and entitlements. You can bet on that.

waco1909 wrote:

Damn Arnold keyboard bad asses are a dime a dozen! He should come and meet me so we could have some fun.Or she? Sounds like a girl I think.

Judged:

1

1

Makin bacon wrote:

<quoted text>
Mike, I should have made myself clear. I was referring to the part of the post where TSF was talking about under educated, and under skilled workforce. There are still plenty of people in their 40's, 50's and 60's that perform the jobs I mentioned without a high school diploma and make a pretty good salary. I'm not saying don't get an education, but these people aren't children of a lesser god because didn't complete high school. They're working, keeping up their families and paying their taxes. I don't have a problem with funding for tech school or any skilled or nonskilled labor.
BTW, you people whine all the time about no money being spent on education and I'm speaking at the college level. My daughter has a couple of friends that have been the recepients of enough college funding that could be on the "Lifestyle of the Rich (forget famous), and you know what they do with their tuition funding; they're band groupies. It funds them following bands from the U.S. to eastsouth Jesus. Dang big pack of them too. On the other hand we have Seven (I know we bust his chops), but the kid's working, keeping a roof over his head and going to school, hey give him some help, I don't mind. My daughter has another friend that decided to go back to school because she didn't complete her degree, she works two jobs and goes to school fulltime with very little funding. If Seven and my daughter's friend can do this, what's wrong with other college kids doing this? If people can't work a job and go to school when they're young, and full of energy, they won't be worth a plug nickel to any employer when they get in the job market.

Judged:

1

Robert Stowe wrote:

<quoted text>You are the ultimate ignoramus!

Arnold-Ziffel wrote:

<quoted text>
I can only wish that it would have been you displaced from your home, and you know what? You may just get your chance someday. You would be the first to be screaming to high heaven about your government benefits and entitlements. You can bet on that.

Judged:

1

Illuinati wrote:

<quoted text>
TSF = T0TALLY STUPID F00l

TSF wrote:

I met several volunteers who loaded up their tools, trucks and supplies and headed to N.O. to help,--for free. They were stopped, turned around and sent back to NC by Blackwater agents and La guardsmen. The government didn't want any free help. It interferes with no bid contracting and kickbacks to corrupt government officials.. The poor and distressed saw very little of the huge sums of government money that poured into La faster than the flood waters.. Prime example of republicans running the government.
<quoted text>

Judged:

1

1

Pro-American wrote:

<quoted text> But why are they poor and why do they not have cars? It's their own fault. Many people escape the ghettos everyday, the ones who don't are either to lazy or have grown accustom to relying on the govt.
As Herman Cain has proved many times, it's the democrats who have succeeded in keeping the poor on the proverbial plantation thru entitlements/handouts while ensuring guaranteed votes.
You can't help someone who doesn't want to help themselves first.

Illuminati wrote:

<quoted text>
DISHONEST SOCIALIST PROPAGANDIST heard from again

Illuminati wrote:

<quoted text>If you could bottle and sell your stupidity, you would become rich beyond your wildest dreams.

Judged:

1

1

Silvercoastcorks wrote:

<quoted text>
I know man, bad bad republicans. I am certain mike, when we win in November, you will say Romney rigged the election or bought off some one, because there isn't rich democrats or democrat super pacs.
Always the same thing with you. Take off the tinfoil hat man.

Judged:

1

Mike Duquette wrote:

<quoted text>Such an articulate rebuttal. Zero substance is a trend of republicans.

Arnold-Ziffel wrote:

<quoted text>
Thank you for your ususal intelligent response. As always, very enlighening.

Illuminati wrote:

<quoted text>
I refuse to waste my time arguing with a dishonest fool.

Illuminati wrote:

<quoted text>
You have been on this thread for many months and hundreds of posts and all you ever do is spout garbage, hurl insults, and call people names. You have not said anything intelligent yet. Circular logic seems to be your best friend.

Mike Duquette wrote:

<quoted text>You do not have a problem funding tech training? Great, one day if you ever tell a republican congressman to do that, we can have some progress. Until then, your republican party is not doing as you wish on this front. They are the party of no. No funding for any advanced education. They do not really even want to fund elementary education.
And as always, you see a couple of examples of abuse of the system and that is all you talk about. That is all the republican representatives hear from you guys. So they just cut, cut, and cut funding to education.
I have no doubt your perception of the kids you speak of spending all their tuition money on being groupies is flawed, as all of your stories are.
But I am sure there is some abuse, but that is life in the big city.

Mike Duquette wrote:

<quoted text>So by your twisted logic, they deserve to die because they are poor?
You have openly admitted you discriminate upon certain peoples. Now you claim they all have fair chance at success. How can one have fair chance if he is being discriminated upon?
Not everyone can get a loan from their parents to start their own business, as Mitt suggested. Mitt is out of touch, and clearly so are you.