thinking from a far wrote:
I do not know this family and while I understand that it is none of my business, what kind of society, better yet, justice system do we have that can prosecute or think about prosecuting a family that did what was in their belief, the right thing. This boy was old enough to be tried as an adult in our legal system but not old enough to decide for himself that he didn't want a doctor? That is what is wrong with our society today, too many people trying to tell other people how to live. We do have freedom of religion in this country don't we, and yes freedom of speech as well but if it was your friend, son or brother that this had happened to, you wouldn't want other people that you didn't even know, butting their nose in your personal business. I wish nothing but peace for this family during this difficult time that is supposed to be private but is now the center of the news media and the courts who think that they can control all who live.
What do you think of religious tolerance when it involves an accidental death during a violent exorcism? How about female genital mutilation? Lines have to be drawn concerning appropriate conduct, whether religion is a factor or not.

Zakk's father stated he knew death was imminent, having seen it before- yet did nothing.

In addition, in this nation all are guaranteed equal treatment under the law. Making exemptions for religion sets a precedent that some are less equal than others. Not fair when anyone else would be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law, and make no mistake- If this was a family who was not Christian Scientist, Follower of Christ, or COFB they WOULD be prosecuted.

How many times must this happen before people take notice?