Sheehan protests George W. Bush’s Texas ranch

Ciny we feel for you and I know there is nothing that could compare to loosing your son. We don't have the draft, so I know he joined. He took an oath to defend his country just like the hundres of thousands before him. I have to ask why are you outraged at Bush and not Obama? Obama promised to end the war. All he is doing is moving the war. Again why was Bush wrong and Obama is right?

Huntsvillemike wrote:

Ciny we feel for you and I know there is nothing that could compare to loosing your son. We don't have the draft, so I know he joined. He took an oath to defend his country just like the hundres of thousands before him. I have to ask why are you outraged at Bush and not Obama? Obama promised to end the war. All he is doing is moving the war. Again why was Bush wrong and Obama is right?

That is a very good point.

Huntsvillemike wrote:

Ciny we feel for you and I know there is nothing that could compare to loosing your son. We don't have the draft, so I know he joined. He took an oath to defend his country just like the hundres of thousands before him. I have to ask why are you outraged at Bush and not Obama? Obama promised to end the war. All he is doing is moving the war. Again why was Bush wrong and Obama is right?

Casey Sheehan joined the military in peace-time (before 9/11) as a way to fund his college education (like hundreds of thousands before him). He took an oath to defend the Constitution from enemies, foreign AND DOMESTIC. He wound up in a war zone on the other side of the planet where he didn't belong as an instrument of illegal American aggression. The people who sent him there are the TRUE enemies of our Constitution: through false-flag terrorist operations they orchestrated (including the September 11 "attacks") and unconstitutional legislation that they wrote (like the Patriot Acts, John Warner Defense Authorization Act, Military Commissions Act, etc.), our criminal leaders have shredded our Constitution, drained our treasury and exploited our military for their own personal gain -- POWER!!

Bush and his advisors are war criminals and should be held accountable for their crimes. This is what Cindy Sheehan is saying. She NEVER said that "Obama is right." Obama is also a war criminal for continuing our illegal military aggressions in Iraq and Afghanistan and expanding them into Pakistan.

What good is Cindy doing stalking Bush,her son died for his country, let him rest in peace instead of dragging his name around like a leash.

Cindy, you should either get a life, or go to jail, we do not need you here in Dallas, go to Crawford.

I hope someone takes a shot at you're nappy old self, you shame you're son's memory.

GO HOME CINDY,CINDY.

Bill wrote:

<quoted text>
Casey Sheehan joined the military in peace-time (before 9/11) as a way to fund his college education (like hundreds of thousands before him). He took an oath to defend the Constitution from enemies, foreign AND DOMESTIC. He wound up in a war zone on the other side of the planet where he didn't belong as an instrument of illegal American aggression. The people who sent him there are the TRUE enemies of our Constitution: through false-flag terrorist operations they orchestrated (including the September 11 "attacks") and unconstitutional legislation that they wrote (like the Patriot Acts, John Warner Defense Authorization Act, Military Commissions Act, etc.), our criminal leaders have shredded our Constitution, drained our treasury and exploited our military for their own personal gain -- POWER!!
Bush and his advisors are war criminals and should be held accountable for their crimes. This is what Cindy Sheehan is saying. She NEVER said that "Obama is right." Obama is also a war criminal for continuing our illegal military aggressions in Iraq and Afghanistan and expanding them into Pakistan.

We must not forget the acts of terrorism committed on Sept. 11. While any lose of live is a tragedy can we consider that these brave souls that took the oath to serve and protect knew what maybe required of them? Can it be that they were concerned about something larger than themselves?

Honer the fallen wrote:

<quoted text>
We must not forget the acts of terrorism committed on Sept. 11. While any lose of live is a tragedy can we consider that these brave souls that took the oath to serve and protect knew what maybe required of them? Can it be that they were concerned about something larger than themselves?

Who committed the acts of terrorism on 9/11? What proof do you have to support your answer? Were the over one million Iraqis that have died as a result of the U.S. invasion responsible for the 9/11 attack and deserving of "retaliation?"

Saddam was responsible for state supported terrorism and we don't know what acts may have been committed by the Iraqi government. What they( the Iraqis) were guilty of was allowing criminals to take over their government. We are heading in the same direction in the U.S. We have a senior Sen. in congress that killed a young woman,tax cheats as cabinet sec. and so on. And our current president may be an illegal alien.

sentinel wrote:

Saddam was responsible for state supported terrorism and we don't know what acts may have been committed by the Iraqi government. What they( the Iraqis) were guilty of was allowing criminals to take over their government. We are heading in the same direction in the U.S. We have a senior Sen. in congress that killed a young woman,tax cheats as cabinet sec. and so on. And our current president may be an illegal alien.

George Bush (and now Barack Obama) was responsible for state supported terrorism (a major U.S.-orchestrated false flag operation was executed on his watch, and two wars of aggression followed, along with the shredding of our Constitution), and we have a very good idea what acts were committed by the elements within the U.S. government and military. Since you think collective punishment of the Iraqi people is justified because of crimes committed by their leaders, then you must also think that the American people are legitimate targets for those wronged by our leaders?

Cindy Sheehan is calling for the prosecution of George Bush and other members of his administration for war crimes. In other words, she is doing what George Bush didn't do: forgo a violent solution and pursue a peaceful means of drawing attention to a leader's crimes with the intent of prosecuting him through existing legal structures rather than indescriminate fire-power.

Her son would probably be ashamed of her, and he was raised by his Dad, not her. So if you think Bush should be tried for war crimes, I guess you think that "The Vietnam War spanned the years of 1959 to 1975. Ergo, the US Presidents during this time were: Dwight Eisenhower, John Kennedy, Lyndon Johnson and Richard Nixon and Gerald Ford should also be tried for war crimes. Maybe President Franklin D. Roosevelt and Truman for the war with Japan, I could go on but its really stupid. War happens sad to say and people are killed and injured, but in order to remain a free country and able to speak out just like she is doing, you have to fight for our freedom to remain. Those countries over there have been fighting since Biblical times, and always will. They do not understand peaceful anything, its beheading, burning, killing and in an inhumane way. So Bill, why don't you and Cindy go talk to the Al Quida, Hezbollah and Hamas since you think it could be pursued in a peaceful manner. We will be watching for you on TV as they parade you around before or after your torture. Good Luck.

Momaw46 wrote:

Her son would probably be ashamed of her, and he was raised by his Dad, not her. So if you think Bush should be tried for war crimes, I guess you think that "The Vietnam War spanned the years of 1959 to 1975. Ergo, the US Presidents during this time were: Dwight Eisenhower, John Kennedy, Lyndon Johnson and Richard Nixon and Gerald Ford should also be tried for war crimes. Maybe President Franklin D. Roosevelt and Truman for the war with Japan, I could go on but its really stupid.

I'm not following your logic. Bush should be tried for war crimes BECAUSE he committed war crimes. Are you suggesting that Vietnam-era crimes legitimize Bush's crimes? Are you suggesting that because the U.S. has launched wars of aggression and committed genocide before, it is entitled to do so forever? Can we not prosecute Bush until we prosecute all the dead presidents you listed?

Momaw46 wrote:

War happens sad to say and people are killed and injured, but in order to remain a free country and able to speak out just like she is doing, you have to fight for our freedom to remain.

Murder happens, sad to say, but does this mean we have to tolerate it and shouldn't prosecute murderers? The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have done nothing to preserve our freedoms. In fact, as the wars rage on our constitutional protections have been completely dismantled under the Bush administration with the passing of the Patriot Acts, the Military Commissions Act, the John Warner Defense Authorization Act, etc. Cindy Sheehan is out there challenging such anti-American B.S. as the "free-speech zones" that confine protesters to out-of-the-way cages. Has our military challenged such an obvious violation of free-speech? No, our military is busy killing poor people on the other side of the planet whose threat to us is negligible in comparison to the threat posed by our own leaders.

Momaw46 wrote:

Those countries over there have been fighting since Biblical times, and always will. They do not understand peaceful anything, its beheading, burning, killing and in an inhumane way. So Bill, why don't you and Cindy go talk to the Al Quida, Hezbollah and Hamas since you think it could be pursued in a peaceful manner. We will be watching for you on TV as they parade you around before or after your torture. Good Luck.

So you think that there's a "humane" way of killing? You don't think American munitions burn and behead and otherwise shread human beings? Al Qaeda, Hezbollah and Hamas ALL receive funding and training from foreign intelligence agencies (including the U.S.). If you want to get rid of "terrorist" groups, a great place to start is with the Pentagon's and State Department's budgets.

And a bit of advice: stop watching TV -- it's destroying your ability to think critically, in my humble opinion.

Iraq was the easiest target of the surrounding countries and they've always been used by foreign countries to make a point. I'm glad I don't live in Iraq.

Bill wrote:

<quoted text>
George Bush (and now Barack Obama) was responsible for state supported terrorism (a major U.S.-orchestrated false flag operation was executed on his watch, and two wars of aggression followed, along with the shredding of our Constitution), and we have a very good idea what acts were committed by the elements within the U.S. government and military. Since you think collective punishment of the Iraqi people is justified because of crimes committed by their leaders, then you must also think that the American people are legitimate targets for those wronged by our leaders?
Cindy Sheehan is calling for the prosecution of George Bush and other members of his administration for war crimes. In other words, she is doing what George Bush didn't do: forgo a violent solution and pursue a peaceful means of drawing attention to a leader's crimes with the intent of prosecuting him through existing legal structures rather than indescriminate fire-power.

I think the American people will be punished enough for electing Obama.