|
Malonian
Malone, NY
|
There is not enough money for buyouts, and buyouts are cheaper than dredging. So again, Howard will make noise and accomplish nothing. Something needs to be done and should be done. Unfortunately for those home owners, it will take more brain power than our current Supervisor possesses. It is important we elect local officials with real ability. It is past time for a change.
|
|
Not From This Side
Malone, NY
|
Yup wrote: Yes, something needs to be done. Surely there is some way of taking care of these people... I wonder if the town has done anything whatsoever to access the necessary funds, from the DEC fines or anywhere else? We can't be talking about all that much money. I understand that it's more than the town has right now, but surely there is a way to do this. Anyone with any leadership skills whatsoever would start by working with Congressman Owens' office, if for nothing more, to survey the possibilities. You'd think that sooner or later local voters would learn that not everything is a popularity contest (although in Maneely's case I'll never understand how he's even remotely likable), or about who is related to who. We need leaders with ABILITY, likable or NOT. Related to half the town or NOT. I think there IS a reasonable solution out there. Malone desperately needs leadership who can access and implement solutions. Who DON'T think the poorer neighborhoods are nothing to worry about. if that's what's happening here, that's just SICK. I am not sure Howard continues to get elected. I think the job will also get harder and impossible for Howard to try to bluff his way through. I think that there are at least 2 people on that board who can do a better job. I think Paul Walbridge and Mary Scharf have both shown leadership during this year.
|
|
Question
Bethlehem, CT
|
Does anyone else think this is the same person talking to himself/herself?
|
|
Malonian
Malone, NY
|
Does anyone else think this is another idiot from out of the area talking to themselves? And desperate for us to listen...
|
|
watt
Malone, NY
|
Not From This Side wrote: <quoted text> I am not sure Howard continues to get elected. I think the job will also get harder and impossible for Howard to try to bluff his way through. I think that there are at least 2 people on that board who can do a better job. I think Paul Walbridge and Mary Scharf have both shown leadership during this year. I disagree-Walbridge does nothing but spout cliches and Malone's version of sound bites. He's also not averse to starting and spreading malicious unfounded rumors about those he dislikes, then hiding behind a facade of false contrite innocence.
|
|
NiMo
Hamilton, NY
|
National Grid may have paid fines but in my opinion the onus is on them to dredge it out. It was their silt to begin with and they were found at fault by the DEC. Why should we have to shoulder the financial burden of their screw-ups and lack of attention to the environment? Why weren't those fines they paid put towards the clean-up? Where did that money go? It's time for some answers. The DEC is a great one for holding people to the law but I wonder just how they actually "help" the environment by fining people. It doesn't fix a thing when they do. They need to hold the responsible parties to doing the right thing in this case and clean the damn thing up. People have a right to live there and have for many years. If I owned property down there I'd look into a class action suit against National Grid. for remedial compensation in a civil action.
|
|
hmmmmm
Malone, NY
|
Yup wrote: There would seem to be a consensus that Howard Maneely is incompetent. How does he keep getting elected? Gee, could it be because the PROCESS is RIGGED? From what's posted here is would seem that the village is irrelevant. Could THAT be because DISSOLUTION is a foregone conclusion?? Huh. Imagine that. wrong on both counts, get your paranoia treated.
|
|
Malonian
Malone, NY
|
Me again wrote: <quoted text> No one wants the job. Do you have anyone in mind that's capable of doing better? We'd all like an option at the next election. We don't get much outside help because, let's face it, Malone is just a blip on the ass of the Adirondacks and nobody gives a good rat's butt about it. It's not like we carry a lot of political clout. Capable of doing better? That is NOT a serious question! It's tough to get through the Caucus in both Democrats and republicans. The charmers who control the caucus, Nichols and Ellis, are desperately into control. Therefor the number one issue is that no candidate can threaten their control. Which means they support only fools or sycophants. We need to remove both Nichols and Ellis for the community to advance. That being said, the opportunity we have to move forward is Scharf for Supervisor. Skill, ability and ethics. Or you could go the other direction and push Dan Clark, Tim Lashomb, or even the truly wonderful Dick Lavigne. Nice choice, no? LOVE to know your opinions, because it does in fact matter. And the two options are very different.
|
|
|
|
Alrighty Then
Albany, NY
|
Mary Scharf would be an excellent supervisor.
|
|
Wichita
Malone, NY
|
Question wrote: Does anyone else think this is the same person talking to himself/herself? excellent observation.
|
|
Alrighty Then
Albany, NY
|
The problem with Maneely is he has too many special interests attached to him.
|
|
Malonian
Malone, NY
|
And though crafty, and adept at disrupting projects he doesn't control, he actually is not very bright. Local government is vital, and requires a modicum of intelligence.
|
|
Malonian
Malone, NY
|
Alrighty Then wrote: Mary Scharf would be an excellent supervisor. maybe of a small Daycare.
|
|
Malonian
Malone, NY
|
Oh look Mommy, the little Sleazy Creep is trying to imitate me again. Isn't he cute! Now run away little Sleazy, and go play with your slime mold friends. So Yup is right about the Nuts Yup/Fake Me. It is one of the local Republican elite. Well don't worry little Sleaze, Mary won't hurt you much, and Howard would make a perfect Republican - not very bright, cunning, desperate to be in charge. You can have him.
|
|
Malonian
Malone, NY
|
Of course Big Tim, Tricky Dan and The Dick all fit the bill too.
|
|
Not From This Side
Malone, NY
|
Malonian wrote: Oh look Mommy, the little Sleazy Creep is trying to imitate me again. Isn't he cute! Now run away little Sleazy, and go play with your slime mold friends. So Yup is right about the Nuts Yup/Fake Me. It is one of the local Republican elite. Well don't worry little Sleaze, Mary won't hurt you much, and Howard would make a perfect Republican - not very bright, cunning, desperate to be in charge. You can have him. I agree. Howard is a wannabe Republican. He has hurt Malone and needs to go. Scharf is the likely candidate. She is honest and hard working. She does her homework and when dealing with an issue it is not what is good for her and her buddies but what is good for Malone.
|
|
watt
Malone, NY
|
Yup wrote: <quoted text> Perhaps because the party caucuses are HOAXES and what really matters is the SMOKE FILLED ROOM with BOTH PARTY HACK ESTABLISHMENTS PRESENT, WORKING IN COLLUSION, VERY MUCH AGAINST THE LAW, TO DENY FREE AND FAIR ELECTIONS AND THWART DEMOCRATIC PROCESSES. You know... deciding who runs unopposed, who runs under opposed, and who is most easily kept under the collective thumbs of the HACKS. BOTH of these local 'parties' are nothing but ORGANIZED CRIMINALS. Their aim is to hold on to what they perceive as 'power', for as long as they possibly can. The irony is that as long as they maintain their grip, this entire area just keeps getting sicker and sicker, year after bloody year. You want to make a difference? LAND FILL LAKE TITUS. It's also infinitely ironic that the party hack STALKER SHRILL in here who constantly complains about what people "demand", when they suggest actions that could actually shed a bit of the light of day on the situation, beyond their feudal control, then DEMANDS that people who are NOT slimy politicians take it upon themselves to run for office. As if THAT were some qualifier of citizenship or something. This STALKER SHRILL is using civic pride as a CLUB to beat down good citizens. THAT noise is very much symptomatic of the worst of what goes on here. And neither will THAT continue. I am, perhaps, one of the Shrills you rave about. Have you taken any of the actions you "suggest?" Didn't think so. Call it what you will (and the word I think you're looking for is "shill"), you are the poster who is the epitome of shrill....and boring. Now, as to your complaint regarding the political parties, I have 2 words for you--third party.
|
|
watt
Malone, NY
|
Yup wrote: <quoted text> Perhaps because the party caucuses are HOAXES and what really matters is the SMOKE FILLED ROOM with BOTH PARTY HACK ESTABLISHMENTS PRESENT, WORKING IN COLLUSION, VERY MUCH AGAINST THE LAW, TO DENY FREE AND FAIR ELECTIONS AND THWART DEMOCRATIC PROCESSES. You know... deciding who runs unopposed, who runs under opposed, and who is most easily kept under the collective thumbs of the HACKS. BOTH of these local 'parties' are nothing but ORGANIZED CRIMINALS. Their aim is to hold on to what they perceive as 'power', for as long as they possibly can. The irony is that as long as they maintain their grip, this entire area just keeps getting sicker and sicker, year after bloody year. You want to make a difference? LAND FILL LAKE TITUS. It's also infinitely ironic that the party hack STALKER SHRILL in here who constantly complains about what people "demand", when they suggest actions that could actually shed a bit of the light of day on the situation, beyond their feudal control, then DEMANDS that people who are NOT slimy politicians take it upon themselves to run for office. As if THAT were some qualifier of citizenship or something. This STALKER SHRILL is using civic pride as a CLUB to beat down good citizens. THAT noise is very much symptomatic of the worst of what goes on here. And neither will THAT continue. p.s.you are always the one who DEMANDS change, but you are never the one who offers to actively seek it. If I am the worst, then rise up and do something about me, no one's stopping you. Otherwise, you are as big a part of the problem as you accuse me of being. So, in our own way, using your logic, we are both slimy politicians, implementing our slimy policies. Didn't the Supreme Court just discuss "activity" and inactivity?" You seem be within their radar-interesting. Finally, btw, I am not a politician, though, unlike you, I do try to stay active in organizations and causes that interest me.)
|
|
No to YUP
Hamilton, NY
|
Shut up Yup. We're sick of seeing you. Go away. You're not impressing anyone. Watt's right. You spout all this rhetoric to have things done but never offer a solution that's practical. Just go away you hypocrite.
|
|
Malonian
Malone, NY
|
Not From This Side wrote: <quoted text> I agree. Howard is a wannabe Republican. He has hurt Malone and needs to go. Scharf is the likely candidate. She is honest and hard working. She does her homework and when dealing with an issue it is not what is good for her and her buddies but what is good for Malone. I'm sorry, I disagree. I think she would "melt-down" under pressure.
|
|
Tell me when this thread is updated:
(Registration is not required)
Add to my Tracker
Send me an email
|