Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Here Is One wrote:

<quoted text>
The abnormals are people like you and the rose ho who defend two guys having sex in front of children........LOL

When have I done that? Posting on topix is not like flinging a turd against the wall and waiting to see of it sticks. Now post the link where I said that!

Here Is One wrote:

<quoted text>
Once again you show that you are too stupid to look for anything but demand everyone cater to you..........ROTFLMAO
Here ya go.....LOL
Post # 10004 here.......www.topix.com/forum /state/ca/TDATRML20BSIND6T2/p4 65

Sorry moron your link does not work. Here is a clue if you post a link and it ain't blue, well you screwed it up. Try again, BTW is it this thread?

Hey Old Gray wrote:

<quoted text>
That procreation is not a requirement of matrimony...?
:0\
Did you have some sort of point, because that IS the reality.
[Jeezus Criste! What an idiot...!]

96% of marriages involve children, that's because marriage has always involved a male and female. Core distinctions from all other relationships.

Just like saying something a thousand times doesn't change reality, nor does sarcasm (smile).

KiMare wrote:

<quoted text>
Honey, your thinking is why you are where you are at. Maybe you should get yourself straight before you try to give others advice.

Dontcha just hate it when a nice lady biotch slaps ya?

Here Is One wrote:

<quoted text>
Not on the mexican government issued certificate and I posted links for you to read.........LOL

As I requested before, repost the links. This should be much easier for you to do than for me to trawl through dozens of pages of topix to find your link.

Wow

Liberals Are FREAKS wrote:

<quoted text>
HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHHAH AHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!
And homosexuality was illigal in this country. It is still a crime punishable by death in many countries today

Homosexuality was never illegal, you dumbass.

Mona Lott wrote:

<quoted text>
Homosexuality was never illegal, you dumbass.

Used to be... The Supreme Court struck down the law as a minority oppression issue. However, many states still have sodomy laws on the books. Only a man can perform the act, but anyone can be on the receiving end of the act, men and women both. Personally, I see NO sense in sticking a man's parts into the sewer system, the cesspool, the disease ridden garbage dump of the body. Anything in a homosexual relationship is OK by me except for this ONE thing which I find totally abhorrent. I hope this doesn't make you moan a lot.

don't get me started tonight.....

Jonah1 wrote:

<quoted text>
Why do you jokers keep telling yourself that we are "pissed off" by your constant strawman arguement? You can discuss it all you want. Doesn't bother me or any of the other gays here. Not one little bit.
Polygamy, polygamy, polygamy.
Still doesn't have anything to do with this string.
Polygamy, polygamy, polygamy.
Shout it with me everyone!! P O L Y G A M Y !!!
<quoted text>
Genetics of marriage!! Yeah, that's it. Damn you are stupid.

It wasn't too long ago that chanting same sex marriage, same sex marriage, same sex marriage was considered nonsense and dismissed as "never gonna happen"..

Just remember that when you dismiss polygamy.

Mona Lott wrote:

<quoted text>
Homosexuality was never illegal, you dumbass.

Really?? Why all the fuss over sodomy laws then?

Dee wrote:

don't get me started tonight.....

Ok, I will hide the keys.

If you think radically redefining marriage is popular, why doesn't Obama favor it? He's running for reelection, claims 'evolving' views, and still believes marriage is only between man and woman.

I think Obama is more likely to support the NOM marriage protection pledge, than come out for same sex marriage.

The Great Sly_Clyde wrote:

<quoted text>When have I done that? Posting on topix is not like flinging a turd against the wall and waiting to see of it sticks. Now post the link where I said that!

I posted the link for the rose ho now you go back when you are sober and look when you did the same

The Great Sly_Clyde wrote:

<quoted text>Sorry moron your link does not work. Here is a clue if you post a link and it ain't blue, well you screwed it up. Try again, BTW is it this thread?

the link works for me
But you have shown that you can't even look at a posting yet alone click on the link

Winston Smith wrote:

<quoted text>As I requested before, repost the links. This should be much easier for you to do than for me to trawl through dozens of pages of topix to find your link.

done it more than enough times
Why should I take the time to post them again when I have posted them dozens of times and there is always some moron that will refuse to look at them and then demand that I post them again

Brian_G wrote:

If you think radically redefining marriage is popular, why doesn't Obama favor it? He's running for reelection, claims 'evolving' views, and still believes marriage is only between man and woman.
I think Obama is more likely to support the NOM marriage protection pledge, than come out for same sex marriage.

You OBVIOUSLY know nothing about President Obama's views.......especially when it comes to the right to marry for Same-Sex Couples......that's for starters.......secondly, the right to marry IS NOT an important reelection talking point.....at least not for me......what should be more important for many Americans is our economy, the housing market and ending wars that should have NEVER been started in the first place!!!

100one

99one