|
“GOP motto?”
Since: Jul 08
Location, location, location
|
Please wait...
dem wrote: <quoted text> Have you seen chiefs Facebook yet Somebody was nice enough to provide a link. Yep, but weren't there actually two names and accounts for the two-faced borrower of Getty pics? Do you think his name is really Tom? I'm thinkin' there's an Elmer or Herman or Willard Mittens behind the saggy gray curtain...
|
|
Kat
Coffeyville, KS
|
lily boca raton fl wrote: <quoted text> I totally agree with you, these rightwingers are the most hateful vile beasts I have ever encountered. I really don't think you can group all rightwingers into the "hateful vile beast" category. I have met and happen to know some very nice rightwingers....I have also met and know some very vile hateful leftwingers and progressive liberals. It's a matter of the one person you are dealing with at the time. All this grouping everyone just based on their politics is really sad and misguided. And as far as the ones making rude comments to someone (in this case being this Carol) because of her having diabetes, it really takes a vile asshole to make fun of or be rude to anyone with a disease that none of us are safe from and none of us ask for or "deserve". There's a special place in hell for assholes like that, left or right "wingers".
|
|
“Kenyan Constitution Cannibal”
Since: Jan 12
Witchdoctor Head Shrinker
|
Please wait...
Jane Says wrote: STUCK ON "FAIRNESS" Obama on Capital Gains: EVERYBODY IS SUPPOSED TO LOSE "If you make more than $1 million a year, you should not pay less than 30 percent in taxes," asserted President Obama in his State of the Union speech. For those with predominantly investment income, that would effectively double their capital gains tax rate from the current 15 percent rate, producing a triple negative impact on U.S. economic growth and job creation by reducing the incentive for domestic investment, increasing the incentive to move more jobs and capital overseas, and directly reducing the amount of capital available in the private sector by way of greater transfers of income to the government. It's not hard to understand the disincentives to job creation in Mr. Obama's proposal. If the government wants more people to quit smoking, it increases taxes on cigarettes. Similarly, if the government wants more people to quit investing, the appropriate policy is an increase in taxes on investment income. And if the government really wants to kill job creation and new investment, it should double the tax on capital gains. So where's the common sense in this call for more roadblocks to investment, more disincentives for the financing of companies and start-ups in the private sector, when 12.8 million Americans by the government's calculations are already out of work, and millions more aren't counted as unemployed because they've given up looking for work and left the work force, and millions more are working at reduced pays or reduced hours. Currently, over 10 million part-timers are looking for full-time employment and can't find it. None are included in the government's unemployment number. Add it all up and the current jobless rate is 17 percent, double the official unemployment rate of 8.3 percent. So why would President Obama be pushing for such a counterproductive policy, a tax hike that's likely to slow economic growth when we're already growing too slowly, cut job creation when we're already breaking records in terms of long-run unemployment, decrease American investment and productivity when we're already reeling from increased global competition, and reduce government revenues when we're already hemorrhaging trillions in red ink? The answer, it seems, is that President Obama is stuck on "fairness," so much so that he gives short shrift to any negative consequences that will predictably flow from his repeated attempts to produce more economic leveling, more redistribution of wealth and income, and more "shared sacrifice." http://spectator.org/archives/2012/02/13/stuc... Great article, written so that even leftist morons should be able to comprehend. But they won't, of course. Sadly and despicably, the Kenyan roadkill's power-mad, Constitution-trampling, communist ideology goes beyond "fairness" on his communist highway to hell.
|
|
“GOP motto?”
Since: Jul 08
Location, location, location
|
Please wait...
carol wrote: <quoted text> What if it is, or not? Well, according to research (requires effort) you weren't "born that way," and it can be controlled by diet and exercise...so "Get up offa' that thang and dance" 'til others' insurance bill is cheaper...
|
|
Amazed
Winter Park, FL
|
Baba Yaga wrote: <quoted text> You should be more discreet. That's right Baba, don't let us know you Shagged Sheep but prefer Yaks.
|
|
lily boca raton fl
Boca Raton, FL
|
Jean wrote: <quoted text> Not to worry. Preventing gay people from getting married is gonna fix everything up. Yeah, and preventing women from obtaining contraception and abortions will too. It took Eric Cantor less than an hour to start lying about President Obama’s budget. Cantor and Republicans in Congress are so desperate to protect special tax breaks for billionaires and Big Oil companies that they’re falsely claiming that President Obama’s budget,“calls for massive tax increases on hardworking families and small businesses.” That’s a bold-faced lie and they know it. President Obama’s plan would simply ensure that the top 1% aren’t paying less in taxes than middle class families
|
|
Since: Feb 10
ny ny
|
Please wait...
Baba Yaga wrote: <quoted text> I suppose all of you hurling the insults at Carol are in perfect health, at your perfect weight, and ready to adorn the cover of a magazine? The hypocrisy here is stifling. Isn't anonymity wonderful? Insults?? If repeating back to Carol her very own statements/ sentiments is considered an insult I'd suggest she tell the truth. Just because someone is lucky enough to have healthcare shouldn't be a free pass to abuse one's health while complaining about others less fortunate and their bad habits and how much it costs. Complaining about entitlements for some while taking advantage of it yourself is hypocritical. Carol does both. Carol wants to call the shots. Delegate who gets what, according to her rules. If it's insulting to tell the truth so be it. You are right, the hypocrisy here is stifling.
|
|
Since: Feb 10
ny ny
|
Please wait...
Judged:
2
Kat wrote: <quoted text> I really don't think you can group all rightwingers into the "hateful vile beast" category. I have met and happen to know some very nice rightwingers....I have also met and know some very vile hateful leftwingers and progressive liberals. It's a matter of the one person you are dealing with at the time. All this grouping everyone just based on their politics is really sad and misguided. And as far as the ones making rude comments to someone (in this case being this Carol) because of her having diabetes, it really takes a vile asshole to make fun of or be rude to anyone with a disease that none of us are safe from and none of us ask for or "deserve". There's a special place in hell for assholes like that, left or right "wingers". It ain't about the "diabetes"...." Kat".
|
|
|
Kat
Coffeyville, KS
|
leosnana wrote: <quoted text>Well, according to research (requires effort) you weren't "born that way," and it can be controlled by diet and exercise...so "Get up offa' that thang and dance" 'til others' insurance bill is cheaper... Well thank goodness that being an ahole is not covered and hopefully is not hereditary (we have enough in this world now). If we had to pay for aholes like yourself our premiums would be out of this world!!! I don't think a dance,walk, or any exercise at all can change an ahole.
|
|
Jean
Poughquag, NY
|
Kat wrote: <quoted text> I really don't think you can group all rightwingers into the "hateful vile beast" category. I have met and happen to know some very nice rightwingers....I have also met and know some very vile hateful leftwingers and progressive liberals. It's a matter of the one person you are dealing with at the time. All this grouping everyone just based on their politics is really sad and misguided. And as far as the ones making rude comments to someone (in this case being this Carol) because of her having diabetes, it really takes a vile asshole to make fun of or be rude to anyone with a disease that none of us are safe from and none of us ask for or "deserve". There's a special place in hell for assholes like that, left or right "wingers". That vile a shole would be Carol and her republican friends who screamed " let him die" to someone with Aids who didn't have heath insurance . That vile a shole is Carol who gives lectures on personal reponsibility to that dying victim of AIDS who didn't have health insurance. You must be a rightwinger. You don't get it.
|
|
“NANA FAUX TEACHER”
Since: Feb 12
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
Nana lie. Nana bad! Nana not pregnant. Nana fat. Nana yelling from basement again. Bad Nana. Bad!
|
|
lily boca raton fl
Boca Raton, FL
|
Kat wrote: <quoted text> I really don't think you can group all rightwingers into the "hateful vile beast" category. I have met and happen to know some very nice rightwingers....I have also met and know some very vile hateful leftwingers and progressive liberals. It's a matter of the one person you are dealing with at the time. All this grouping everyone just based on their politics is really sad and misguided. And as far as the ones making rude comments to someone (in this case being this Carol) because of her having diabetes, it really takes a vile asshole to make fun of or be rude to anyone with a disease that none of us are safe from and none of us ask for or "deserve". There's a special place in hell for assholes like that, left or right "wingers". I didn't make fun of Carol's diabetes, that's not my style. I don't think anyone "made fun" of it, just used it as an example to prove a point of the hypocrisy so rampant on the right. Rude and hateful comments come from the rightwingers on here; i.e. when Grey mentioned his cancer treatments; fred said he hoped he would die. That's rightwing hate. Rightwing hate is Jane, who has admittedly followed the homeless to make sure they're homeless and has documented their movements and is contemptuous of the money they beg for. I could go on and on, read the posts from rush10 and eman... When I say rightwingers, I am mainly referring to the people on here in our own little forum.
|
|
fred
Milford, CT
|
Jean wrote: <quoted text> I never claimed that you insufferable hypocrite liar. The Kenyan lizard's gambit to plant wedge between women and the church not polling well. America recognizes the danger of a communist dictator ripping up the constitution. February 14, 2012 6 in 10 Catholics disapprove of Obama by Paul Bedard There goes the Catholic vote. Nearly four years after President Obama won 54 percent of Catholic voters, their support has plummeted to just 40 percent in the first poll conducted after he imposed a new birth control mandate on employers, including Catholic agencies. In a new Rasmussen poll, 59 percent of Catholics now disapprove of the president's job. Rasmussen reports that 44 percent strongly disapprove. About 40 percent at least somewhat approve of Obama's job.
|
|
“democraticpassel .com”
Since: Oct 11
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
yepperz wrote: <quoted text> It ain't about the "diabetes"...." Kat". Carol is a Plutogligacrat. Dont touch her Medicare!
|
|
fred
Milford, CT
|
lily boca raton fl wrote: <quoted text> I didn't make fun of Carol's diabetes, that's not my style. I don't think anyone "made fun" of it, just used it as an example to prove a point of the hypocrisy so rampant on the right. Rude and hateful comments come from the rightwingers on here; i.e. when Grey mentioned his cancer treatments; fred said he hoped he would die. That's rightwing hate. Rightwing hate is Jane, who has admittedly followed the homeless to make sure they're homeless and has documented their movements and is contemptuous of the money they beg for. I could go on and on, read the posts from rush10 and eman... When I say rightwingers, I am mainly referring to the people on here in our own little forum. lily = vodka swilling liar. fred said he thought ghost was lying about having cancer.
|
|
“Constitutionalis t”
Since: Dec 10
Conroe, TX
|
Please wait...
RealDave wrote: <quoted text> You left out the part where the Democrat LBJ escalated the war against the very same communists you say he loved. Now really, aren't you just being silly here. Wait, you also forgot where the Democrat JFK stopped the communists from putting missiles in Cuba? Now why would that communist loving JFK do that? CRA was under Bush? Really? I just love the way you bozos rewrite history. Allow me to elaborate. Like I said, it took the Democrats about 20 years to recover from the Alger Hiss conviction. This brings us to the mid 60s. Johnson came to power in the period where the communists suffered the severe defeat of the Alger Hiss conviction. If you recall history, by 1968 the so-called "mainstream" media began promoting the first lie in a system of lies about Vietnam, "the war is unwinable." The resumption of the communists' control of the Democratic Party is evidenced by Johnson's quitting the office of President. Again, if you recall Johnson is seeming agony about the Marines at Khe Sanh, if they were overrun, then the US will pull out of Vietnam just like the French did after Dien Bien Phu. The Marines didn't get overrun. The next thing Johnson does is quit, like he was told to do. This is when the Democrats begin duping the population into thinking the war is the Republicans' fault. Again, if you recall history, immediately after the next election, another lie is invented by the Democrats - "Nixon's War." With Nixon in office, the Democrats weren't able to give South Vietnam to the communists easily. They had to get rid of Nixon first. All during this time, the so-called "most trusted man in America" is duping the population with the lies the Democrats are inventing about Vietnam. It was 1973 before the Democrats could deliver South Vietnam to the communists in a defeat of the United States. After the South Vietnamese defeated the single largest invasion of the war without any assistance from US ground combat units, which had been removed from Vietnam the previous year, the Easter Offensive of 1972, the Democrat-controlled congress of 1973 cur off all funding to the country and government of South Vietnam. Additionally, they passed the Case-Church Amendment which prevented any transfer of aircraft, weapons, munitions and supplies from US Armed Forces to South Vietnam. As a result of the 1973 Democrat-controlled congress, the communists invaded a disarmed and defenseless South Vietnam. Since, there has not been an election in Vietnam. Since, the statistically worst case of mass murder in the history of civilization occurred in Southeast Asia. Had the Democrat-controlled congress only allowed the South Vietnamese to re-arm after they defeated the single largest communist invasion of the war in 1972, there is no reason to believe South Vietnam would be any different than South Korea today, with a vibrant economy and democracy.
|
|
“fairtax.org”
Since: Dec 08
gauley bridge wv
|
Please wait...
Wartime VII wrote: <quoted text> Great article, written so that even leftist morons should be able to comprehend. But they won't, of course. Sadly and despicably, the Kenyan roadkill's power-mad, Constitution-trampling, communist ideology goes beyond "fairness" on his communist highway to hell. 'Season ticket on a one-way ride'
|
|
“democraticpassel .com”
Since: Oct 11
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
Kat wrote: <quoted text> Well thank goodness that being an ahole is not covered and hopefully is not hereditary (we have enough in this world now). If we had to pay for aholes like yourself our premiums would be out of this world!!! I don't think a dance,walk, or any exercise at all can change an ahole. Kat=Plutogligacrat
|
|
fred
Milford, CT
|
lily boca raton fl wrote: <quoted text> I didn't make fun of Carol's diabetes, that's not my style. I don't think anyone "made fun" of it, just used it as an example to prove a point of the hypocrisy so rampant on the right. Rude and hateful comments come from the rightwingers on here; i.e. when Grey mentioned his cancer treatments; fred said he hoped he would die. That's rightwing hate. Rightwing hate is Jane, who has admittedly followed the homeless to make sure they're homeless and has documented their movements and is contemptuous of the money they beg for. I could go on and on, read the posts from rush10 and eman... When I say rightwingers, I am mainly referring to the people on here in our own little forum. lily and comrade Jean are a volcano of hate on this forum. Trying to excuse themselves for the venomous hate they spew shows the liberal double standard in action. America does not forgive.
|
|
“Kenyan Constitution Cannibal”
Since: Jan 12
Witchdoctor Head Shrinker
|
Please wait...
Nanasleo wrote: Nana lie. Nana bad! Nana not pregnant. Nana fat. Nana yelling from basement again. Bad Nana. Bad! Illegal Aunt Zeituni and illegal drunken Uncle Onyango are on the way to help Nana. They bring good drugs from nephew.
|
|
Tell me when this thread is updated:
(Registration is not required)
Add to my Tracker
Send me an email
|