Obamas Popularity is Waning

"Progress is a peace plan based on false hope and change"

Sheepeople sez: OBAAAAAAAAAAMA

MoonBat Hunter wrote:

If Obama serves two terms the United States will cease to exist as we know it.

I hope so, things could always get worse but I think they're bad enough. We need to restore our greatness.

The Goverment should not dictating to a "free market" They should not be giving OUR money away.
Far as the choosen ones rattings slump
gee there's a surprise!! Don't try blaming it on
Bush. He had a better ratting that NaziPelosi and
her buds in congress in the finnal years of Bush.
And they sat on their hands and did nothing.
only moved to point fingers.

ONG wrote:

According to the recent MSNBC poll, yes MSNBC! I find it hard to believe they even posted it. Obama had a 55% unfavorability rating and its dropping at at increasing rate. Most were D's and F's. Thats a huge drop in little over 3 months for the one who was going to bring CHANGE and save the world.

It will never get as low as bush's

Tony wrote:

Maybe Wagoner of GM should have been let go but not by the government, but by his own board of directors.
Barney Frank's gay lover/husband is a big wig at Fannie Mae and Frank should be thrown out of Congress for conflict of interest.
This Democratic Pelosi/Reid/Frank/Dodd led Congress is going to sink this country irregardless of what Bush or Obama did or will do. We need to vote them out in 2010 if it's not to late by then.

"IRREGARDLESS" technically not a word. You shouldn't use it. People of intelligence will automatically dismiss everything you say after using that word.

Is anybody aware of the prophecy where the world will end as we know it on DEC 20th 2012? That is either just after Obama gets reelected, or just after his only term in office where is screws things up so bad the world comes to an end shortly after.

Sorry... where he screws things up. not where is.

I'm amused to see "ratting" and "Bush" used in the same post.

The Original Lowell Guy wrote:

<quoted text>
Blappity, blappity, blap!!! That's all I hear. Yawn.

Once again another Liberal is confronted with facts and they have no common sense response.

Feel free to make as big of an a$$ out of yourself as you like.

KILLKILLKILL wrote:

<quoted text>
"IRREGARDLESS" technically not a word. You shouldn't use it. People of intelligence will automatically dismiss everything you say after using that word.

Actually, it is in Websters, look it up, had the same bet with someone and got proven wrong, it is a word.

This nation is already on the road to ruin and has been for some time. Morality is at an all time low, + a totally alienated military. That alone in allot of countries would trigger mass protests, and violent ones at that.

The Original Lowell Guy wrote:

<quoted text>
This must be that new math they talk about.

Please come out of your "Virtual Coma"
and notice that it was posted on the MSNBC website, it is not new math.

Titanic wrote:

" If Pelosi and Obama were on a boat in the middle of the ocean and it started to sink, who would be saved?....... AMERICA!"

Ahh one can dream

DIEDIEDIE wrote:

Is anybody aware of the prophecy where the world will end as we know it on DEC 20th 2012? That is either just after Obama gets reelected, or just after his only term in office where is screws things up so bad the world comes to an end shortly after.

Prophecy? Please.

Eric Stratton III wrote:

<quoted text>
Actually, it is in Websters, look it up, had the same bet with someone and got proven wrong, it is a word.

"Ain't" is in the dictionary as well. That doesn't make it a word.
I have a friend who is a tech writer....and he was incensed when they started including irregardless. Ah,, the dumbing down of the language.

Yah, it's a word but that doesn't make it a good one.
If you are using Websters to defend it you should understand their stance on it:
"Its reputation has not risen over the years, and it is still a long way from general acceptance"
American Heritage, which is a better resource (IMHO) has a fabulous commentary on it:
"Irregardless is a word that many mistakenly believe to be correct usage in formal style, when in fact it is used chiefly in nonstandard speech or casual writing. Coined in the United States in the early 20th century, it has met with a blizzard of condemnation for being an improper yoking of irrespective and regardless and for the logical absurdity of combining the negative ir– prefix and –less suffix in a single term. Although one might reasonably argue that it is no different from words with redundant affixes like debone and unravel, it has been considered a blunder for decades and will probably continue to be so. "

stfu wrote:

<quoted text>
It will never get as low as bush's

Wth are you talkin about. Please wait to see if we even survive as a nation while Nobama is president.

ONG, how about you wait and see if we thrive.

What! Vote them out and do what? Put Senile McSame,his daughter expense account" Palin, Boehner, Mitch McConnell, Steve King. Bring back Cheney, Condi Rice, karl Rove, and VP George Bush,Jr. They did a heck of a job.

President Obama is making more progress in 56 days than the Republicans did in 8 years.

What exasctly was it that PRESIDENT Obama did wrong again?

Wait just one second...

1. This "poll" is almost a month old.
2. The only "news" source "reporting" on this is the lunatic WorldNetDaily.
and

3. It was a freakin' unscientific internet poll that was obviously manipulated or "freeped" by the irrational shutins who do this for their dead end "cause".

To all those haters and by real polls, your numbers are dwindling, sit back, relax and let Obama and the Democrats put this country back on track after your ilk nearly drove it to ruin.