P-2
Many bloggers and Liberal commentators think the only way their respective states are going to get gay marriage is to have it imposed by judical or legislative means, against the will of the voters ( Maryland, for example, where a gay activist was quoted: "...it would be 'irresponsible' to leave this issue in the hands of the voters..." [!!!!]) a gay proponent suggests Legislature impose gay marriage on the Land, quite independant and indifferent to the will of the voters. "Irrational fears" was one sentiment in an interview I read giving reasons why the Populace doesn't support gay marriage. That their irrational bias keeps them from being able to fully embrace what's best for them, and that progressive and "enlightened" leaders must "modernize" them to basically save them from their own ignorance. One example already (Dave Parker, Massachusetts) reveals how they use this tool to snowball power in the Culture, using gay marriage as the verdict against the freedom against parents being allowed to opt their children out of pro-gay social engeneering in Ma. schools.
Gay marriage is but a public-relations tool- advancing and legitimizing the legacy of a demonstrably disordered lifestyle with the official, authenticating stamp of Government approval, and to be used as a platform to snowball the momentum of a Movement that's drunk with power. Gay activists then repackage it in the guise of social justice and civil rights (having read the article, you're privy to what I'm describing).One example already reveals how they use this tool to snowball power in the Culture, using gay marriage as the verdict against the freedom of parents being allowed to opt their children out of pro-gay social engeneering in Ma. schools.http://www.massresista nce.org/docs/parker/
And among all those tainted apples,-those examples- one could indeed find rare cases of perennial, celibate and committed gay couples that could put most straight marriages to shame. Those are the one's the Media is trying to pass as the most typical form - like possessing a pest-ridden, diseased fruit tree and then carefully selecting the few unblemished apples among the tarnished to take to your friends so you can brag about how good your harvest will be.
Shoddy. Deceptive. Devious.
Can't we execute social-engeneering without falsehoods?
On this matter, no.