George W. Bush NOT WELCOME at Republican National Convention

ohyea wrote:

<quoted text>
As long as its his money who cares?
The tax payers fund the trips and partying going on in DC.
Bid difference

The taxpayers are also funding Romney. DC is DC and the same DC it's always been. Obama didn't invent DC either.

Possibly you could learn to type English before you start giving Forum advice......"bid difference". ha

As far as it being Romney's money...no it isn't. It's money he acquired through costing people their jobs, using govt. loan monies before filing bankruptcie, income generated from nonUSA accounts and the savings in tax dollars he "didn't earn" from offshore accounts that were tax havens. All his money was taken from somewhere else. It's that damned redistribution of wealth thing your team is so opposed to! Would you have thunk it?

SpeakUp wrote:

<quoted text>
The taxpayers are also funding Romney. DC is DC and the same DC it's always been. Obama didn't invent DC either.
Possibly you could learn to type English before you start giving Forum advice......"bid difference". ha
As far as it being Romney's money...no it isn't. It's money he acquired through costing people their jobs, using govt. loan monies before filing bankruptcie, income generated from nonUSA accounts and the savings in tax dollars he "didn't earn" from offshore accounts that were tax havens. All his money was taken from somewhere else. It's that damned redistribution of wealth thing your team is so opposed to! Would you have thunk it?

all of your shit spewing for obama will not gain him any leverage in ky especially in eastern ky southestern ky george w bush could beat obama in the southern states and thats just how it is.

George w bush is welcome in my home any day of the week i likeed his policies and his stand against terrorist waterbord til they talk and then lock their asses up.

GEORGE w BUSH was a force to be reckoned with he flushed the terriost out of hidding so the next president could get enough balls to kill them not do what Clinton did hit and run ball but hit and keep on hitting. he would have been a good govoner in il. he would have wiped the corruption out that ruins chi-town.

conleypeningtonhillwacher wrote:

George w bush is welcome in my home any day of the week i likeed his policies and his stand against terrorist waterbord til they talk and then lock their asses up.

I agree with you 100%.

GEORGE W BUSH A MANS MAN and unlike the sitting pres.or the golfing pres.he had balls big balls and nancy pelois loved watching him walk the runway to board airforce one and look to all her democrats and say that man has balls.

conleypeningtonhillwacher wrote:

George w bush is welcome in my home any day of the week i likeed his policies and his stand against terrorist waterbord til they talk and then lock their asses up.

bush talked like a cowboy and did nothing, Obama nailed their asses. So much for your phony tough guy whose policies destroyed us. Who got bin laden?

conleypeningtonhillwacher wrote:

GEORGE W BUSH A MANS MAN and unlike the sitting pres.or the golfing pres.he had balls big balls and nancy pelois loved watching him walk the runway to board airforce one and look to all her democrats and say that man has balls.

Get real, little georgie was a failure, so bad romney won't appear with him. Mission accomplished, my rump. The war in Iraq was a disaster, and he could not even get Bin Laden. Typical weak republican, all bs, no substance or guts. Like Cheney he avoid Viet Nam because he did not have the balls to serve in combat. Easy to send a bunch of poor kids, when you failed.

conleypeningtonhillwacher wrote:

GEORGE w BUSH was a force to be reckoned with he flushed the terriost out of hidding so the next president could get enough balls to kill them not do what Clinton did hit and run ball but hit and keep on hitting. he would have been a good govoner in il. he would have wiped the corruption out that ruins chi-town.

Speak English lately..."govoner"?? ? What's that? Something you eat? Yeah and I bet anything you'd give Bush credit for Newt being able to built his Moon Colony also? lmao

Oh and btw, where did Bush flush 'em to since they were in Pakistan all along? You'll help us with that, right. Right.

The Real Just Me wrote:

<quoted text>I agree with you 100%.

Why...thank you!

Get Real wrote:

<quoted text>
Get real, little georgie was a failure, so bad romney won't appear with him. Mission accomplished, my rump. The war in Iraq was a disaster, and he could not even get Bin Laden. Typical weak republican, all bs, no substance or guts. Like Cheney he avoid Viet Nam because he did not have the balls to serve in combat. Easy to send a bunch of poor kids, when you failed.

Cheney's deferrments? About 9 to be exact. What a total coward. He didn't even have the ba--s to support his own gay daughter during his term. He had to wait until his term was finished to say "I love her". He did however, not receive deferrment to appoint Ken Lay of bankrupt Enron fame to his secret Energy Commission and to make sure Halliburton and all it's blind subsidiaries got all the contracts in Iraq~....what a man!

conleypeningtonhillwacher wrote:

<quoted text>all of your shit spewing for obama will not gain him any leverage in ky especially in eastern ky southestern ky george w bush could beat obama in the southern states and thats just how it is.

Now that really tears me up since Ky. don't mean shit in a national election. However, if it makes you feel good...do it to it!

Did you notice who Obama threatened when he wasn't getting his way on raising the debt ceiling?

He threatened to not pay:

Social Security Retirees,

Military Retirees,

Social Security disability and Federal Retirees.

&#65533;

Now.. Let this sink in really good -

He did not threaten to stop payments to illegal aliens

He did not threatened to take frivolous benefits such as Internet access away from violent inmates

He did not offer to fire some of the thousands of unnecessary federal employees that he hired

He did not offer to cut down on his or his wife's frivolous gallivanting around

He did not threaten to not pay the senators and representatives or any of their staff

He did not threaten to take benefits away from welfare recipients

He did not threaten the food stamp programs

He did not threaten to not pay foreign aid

He did not threaten to cut back on anything that involves his base voters

The list could go on and on. He is in full political re-election mode!

Crystal Ball wrote:

Did you notice who Obama threatened when he wasn't getting his way on raising the debt ceiling?
He threatened to not pay:
Social Security Retirees,
Military Retirees,
Social Security disability and Federal Retirees.
&#65533;
Now.. Let this sink in really good -
He did not threaten to stop payments to illegal aliens
He did not threatened to take frivolous benefits such as Internet access away from violent inmates
He did not offer to fire some of the thousands of unnecessary federal employees that he hired
He did not offer to cut down on his or his wife's frivolous gallivanting around
He did not threaten to not pay the senators and representatives or any of their staff
He did not threaten to take benefits away from welfare recipients
He did not threaten the food stamp programs
He did not threaten to not pay foreign aid
He did not threaten to cut back on anything that involves his base voters
The list could go on and on. He is in full political re-election mode!

Actually, all those things he did not threaten have been budgeted and to prevent them would take an ACT of CONGRESS.(good luck with that)

hehe
Step away from the Kool-Aid, stop believing the Right-Wing-Nut eMails. Learn to think for yourself.
hehe

hehe wrote:

<quoted text>
Actually, all those things he did not threaten have been budgeted and to prevent them would take an ACT of CONGRESS.(good luck with that)
hehe
Step away from the Kool-Aid, stop believing the Right-Wing-Nut eMails. Learn to think for yourself.
hehe

Actually I DO - you are the one eat up with the crap the current administration is dishing out!

Crysttal Ball wrote:

<quoted text>
Actually I DO - you are the one eat up with the crap the current administration is dishing out!

Actually, you have let to post a single original thought.
You've simply continued to re post whiny things other whiners have already whined about
(Take away the Internet from violent offenders ?? whine whine whine)

hehe

Actually the difference between me & the hehe..I pay close attention to the news, & read newspapers! Then listen to the words and phrases that proud Liberals use to promote their causes. Then, compare the words of the left to the words and phrases I hear from those evil, heartless, greedy conservatives. From the Left you will hear "I feel." From the Right you will hear "I think." From the Liberals you will hear references to groups -- The Blacks, the Poor, the Rich, the Disadvantaged, the Less Fortunate. From the Right you will hear references to individuals. On the Left you hear talk of group rights; on the Right, individual rights.

That about sums it up, really: Liberals feel. Liberals care. They are actually the pack animals whose identity is tied up in group dynamics. Conservatives think -- and, setting aside the theocracy crowd, their identity is centered on the individual.

Liberals feel that their favored groups have enforceable rights to the property and services of productive individuals. Conservatives, I among them I might add, think that individuals have the right to protect their lives and their property from the plunder of the masses. Case closed hehe!

As I stated earlier -
NOT A SINGLE ORIGINAL THOUGHT !
http://www.google.com/search...

Case closed dumbass GOP brainwashed repeating Mule

hehe

Crystal Ball wrote:

Actually the difference between me & the hehe..I pay close attention to the news, & read newspapers! Then listen to the words and phrases that proud Liberals use to promote their causes. Then, compare the words of the left to the words and phrases I hear from those evil, heartless, greedy conservatives. From the Left you will hear "I feel." From the Right you will hear "I think." From the Liberals you will hear references to groups -- The Blacks, the Poor, the Rich, the Disadvantaged, the Less Fortunate. From the Right you will hear references to individuals. On the Left you hear talk of group rights; on the Right, individual rights.
That about sums it up, really: Liberals feel. Liberals care. They are actually the pack animals whose identity is tied up in group dynamics. Conservatives think -- and, setting aside the theocracy crowd, their identity is centered on the individual.
Liberals feel that their favored groups have enforceable rights to the property and services of productive individuals. Conservatives, I among them I might add, think that individuals have the right to protect their lives and their property from the plunder of the masses. Case closed hehe!

Bullchit!!

SpeakUp wrote:

<quoted text>
Now that really tears me up since Ky. don't mean shit in a national election. However, if it makes you feel good...do it to it!

it makes me feel real good .will acorn be stealing votes this election?only way obama has a rats ass chance is to steal the electoral vote .