Interview With A Condemned man: Charles Dean Hood

In response to the e-mail web talk you and the others discuss.

Those who like to vent, be opinionated concerning my case, and the circumstances. Since I can tell with the help from my friend those who believe their opinions as to what happened, You’re absolute WRONGE!

It goes to show how educated you are to this case, the investigation was so sloppy to say the least. At best it is mind boggling you don’t believe (people) didn’t lie in this case. So many committed perjury. Prosecution displayed performances that would win Hollywood Best award acting. They lied to the jury when they would not get Expert testimony to support their case or theory. And the illicit sexual affair with the trial judge did not support my case / cause, because what you didn’t know was most of my case was done in the Judges chambers without the court reporter keeping record of what is said. And also for the jury not to hear. So! What good was it for me to have a jury if the Judge and her lover the head Prosecution kept them from hearing certain parts from the case?

And since it ok that part. Why? Wouldn’t they let the jury hear evidence in this case, like the
(Death Threat Tapes) that Mr. Williamson was receiving, and recorded. That is why I was hired as his bodyguard. To accuse me of killing those folks is wrong!

My attorney at trial wouldn’t allow me to testify on my behalf. Or the jury would have heard my voice to know it was not ( ME ) on the 911 tape. They could have determined right then it wasn’t me. After being convicted. I filed a complaint to the Bar Association against my attorney expressing he wouldn’t have the voice analyses test done.( ie. Bar Association complaint number three, failure to have a voice print test done.) His comment to it was ( Him and other attorney made a tactical judgment about whether to pursue the issue. Assistant Javef Heifmiller told them to get it preformed, I quote: The attorney again, After being convicted he states don’t worry ( he will be executed.) Goes to show you what type of attorney I had at trial. He didn’t care about saving my life, nor did he care about presenting evidence to prove I was innocent.

So! Regardless what your opinion is on the 911 tape I tried, and continue to try to get it the test done through appeals attorneys. I cant do nothing from this prison cage ( cell ) I am in you must rely on your attorney to assist you, but when you have lawyers who are afraid to go through with it. What can you do? Your appointed a lawyer to put forth your case, but what society doesn’t know is attorneys work for the state. They will not bite the hand that feeds them, meaning that is their bread and butter. If they get you off Judges wont appoint cases for him/ her to represent. It a system you scratch my back, ill scratch your back. It is the good buddy system.

People are extremely ignorant as to the circumstances. Until you are in my shoes you have No-idea what the truth is, Or unless you believe the prosecution sleeping with the judge, and going to trial for the upcoming election you want to win the case regardless if you convict a innocent man.

Let me explain several things to you, to enlighten you.

^ Why was there blood at the crime scene that was not Mr. Williamson’s, or Tracie’s, or mine?

^ Why was there numerous fingerprints throughout the house, even on the safe that was broken into?

^Why wasn’t the hair tested that was found in Tracie’s hand?

^ Why wasn’t the rape test done on her?

^ Why do they say continue to say she was in a plastic bag when the crime scene video shows other wise?

^ Why do they say that only one thumb print was found on the bag,

^She (the female victim) was killed in the master bedroom clear across the house, yet no fingerprints were of mine in there, NO bloody ones either?

^ Why wouldn’t they prove what type of fingerprints they were?

One my lawyer was going over to the prosecutions office and giving up vital evidence pertaining to the case. Real good If a fingerprint is on the surface of something, and blood is splattered doesn’t that make a blood fingerprint? You must educate yourself before you pass judgment.

As for the checks, why didn’t they do a hand writing annalist test to prove I didn’t forge them? But instead the prosecution put on a Hollywood act for the jury instead. And how can I be in two places at the one time? I was at the cash express checking place with someone. The lady inside the cash express explained to them. I can not get that person to come forward, to help me.

There is so much you do not know.
I did not steal the car, watch, credit card, etc. And it could be proved also I didn’t.

And how stupid it sounded why don’t I get a polygraph test. Texas doesn’t recognize this test, it has no clout in the courts. Dame straight I would submit to one but it is inadmissible at court, or on appeal. They wont except it. I would of had it preformed long time ago. Back to the watch it wasn’t stolen, and I only had one credit card, and it was giving to me for use of keeping gas in the vehicles, and personal use, and when I was arrested in Indiana there was no girl in the car, or any girl having a stolen bracelet.

Excellent representation. Bull Shit. Get into this type of situation I am in, and ask yourself if I had a good lawyers.
representation Huh?

I do have a good attorney now, and hopefully. I do believe my case will be reversed. I’ll get another trial. To get a fair chance.

Everyone else who has judge me I say this to you. " GOD BLESS YOU "

Respectfully.
Charles D. Hood.

To those who wish to continue to hate me, wished I got executed etc. I say please continue to talk trash about me, all it is doing is giving someone else a break so you don’t move onto someone else you don’t even know and pass judgment upon them. I’m going to walk free, because off these ruthless corrupted officials who withheld evidence, and fabricated evidence to justify a conviction to assist their political status.



I say GOD bless to you.



Charles.





Yeah the execution dates sure do drive a person down, but I walk by faith, and continue to keep it in GODS hands. They are trying to circumvent the issue the tcca, but my attorneys are going to file something else, and if they still do not want to give the full reversal. They’ll take it to the Federal level. I’m just waiting to see what happens, at least no more executions dates that’s for sure. I believe it, as you do they know they have nothing on me, they wrongfully convicted me, and now it gonna be alright.



“God Bless you”



Your friend.



Charles.

I was over at a pro death penalty board call pro death penalty information. That has 15 pages of comments on the web page forum expressing that they wanted Charles Hood executed. I went to the site and asked some questions since they claim they have information on this case proving guilt. I will post what I posted on their site here. I was banned form the site for posting a statement that they removed. The one statements that never got removed they censored the entire statement. I will post the real post here also. The statement above form Charles Hood himself was removed on the grounds that they do not want to listen to anything he has to say. These people belonging to this forum want Mr. Hood executed, and don’t even know why! The link. Then go to forums

http://off2dr.com/modules/extcal/event.php...

Re: Charles Dean Hood - Texas Death Row - Sept. 10, 2008!« Reply #221 on: September 30, 2008, 07:27:26 PM »

What people do not know about his case, and legal experts are not saying that this is a slam-dunk if he gets a new trial. The 911 tape was never tested, no voice print test, and the fifth appeals court rejected his appeal on the grounds that his voice could be heard on that tape. Hood claims that is not his voices in the background. It was never proved through science.

The jury requested to listen to the 911 tape during deliberation, but Hood never testified for a comparison also.

The lead detective in the original investigation said "it was not Hood who committed the murders" he was removed from the investigation.

The Paraffin test was preformed. It proved Hood never fired a weapon. That was not introduced into evidence or court. The murder weapon was never found. Hood has an alibi witness that he was at the cash-checking machine 3 minutes after the murder.” An impossible drive from the house to the machine in the time in question, but it could be proved he was at the machine.

The car Hood was driving belonging to the male victim had no evidence of blood or DNA from the murder, he had permission to drive the car, not stolen as suggested by the state.

The check was not analyzes that he was trying to cash by experts, but suggested was a fraud.

Hood only had one credit belonging to the male victim,(not a bunch) that he had permission to use, and was actively using before, and after the murder.

Witness were being coach on what to say before testifying, and one witness gave five different stories on one event fact. When question she does not know which one is true.

A rape test was not preformed on the female victim,(she was found nude) the hair found on the female victims was not tested, EST.

Hood never stole the Rolex. That was a suggestion by the state through a witness, never proved.

Hood worked for the male victim, and had access to everything, he had no motive to murder these people, and was hired to protect them. The male victim was receiving death threats, that is why Hood got hired in the first place, and those threats are on tape, and reported to police.

They are alternative suspects with greater motive, that were not investigated, and one owned a weapon similar to the one used in these murders.

The bloody fingerprints belonging to Hood were never tested as splatter prints that blood gets on. Hoods prints were not in key areas of the home as the state suggested. Hood lived in the home, his prints will be in that house, but none were in the room the female victim was murdered, and no bloody ones also fact.

The appeals courts rejected Hoods appeals to have anything tested that could suggest an alternative outcome as not relevant.

This is just a little about the case that the American people do not understand. It will not be a slam-dunk, as some people believe. Hoods new lawyers would not be fighting for a new trial only to look like fools in a courtroom.

Re: Charles Dean Hood - Texas Death Row - Sept. 10, 2008!« Reply #229 on: October 01, 2008, 01:26:56 PM »

No. I just wanted the people to know that it is not a guarantee that Hood will be found guilty based on the evidence, or facts if he receives a new trial. It was my opinion about the TCCA, but everything else in my opinion is true from what I could find out about the case, but I am subject to being corrected also. I do not believe the people want the forum plastered with links, if anyone looks into these statements, and wants to clarify a specific statement. I will provide the source, or where I obtained the information with my opinion, and no I do not wish to continue a war with Jim or anyone. I know where to find him. I just read the thread on Charles Hood, and was surprised the opinions never covered certain aspect of the case. I covered the case over at life on the row as mentioned, so that will not happen here, if anyone is interested go over there and read the arguments, yes, I was corrected a few times about the investigation, but I believe in my opinion Hood has a very good defense if he does receive a new trial. Things can be introduced that was not tested from the original trial that under the appeals processes cannot be introduced under the new evidence argument or relevance. In my opinion Mr.Hood claims his voice is not in the background in the 911 tape introduced into evidence at the original trial, that evidence placed him at the murder as for the timeline. Mr. Hood claims he was at the check cashing place when that call occurred,

part 0ne.

Henrik let me ask you a question; do you consider yourself to be a BRIGHT fellow like your friends Jeff, and Lloyd? Like in school were you the same as the other kids? The reason I ask is I am trying to figure out something related to common sense as to a statement made by yourself, and others on this death penalty information site.
I did look into this case intensively Henrik, and I base my opinions on this forum from judicial opinions, court appeals, judges written explanations, motions filed on appeal, court transcripts, Est. The great people on the forum would have you believe I read the news paper one day and came up with (((bright))) idea that Hood was framed, and based everything I believe from magazines clippings, AND a crime TV story movies on TV or something.
The truth is the validity of my posts have come into question as a defensive maneuver in my opinion to discredit the facts as we know them in this original investigation to be. That was my fault. The facts as I know them of this case, cannot, and will not be contradict by anyone on this forum. I could post links as I mentioned from judicial opinions, court transcripts, motions filed. It took me 5 minutes to locate the fifth appeals court ruling concerning the 911 tape on a regular search on the Internet, no special magic trick, just a basic search. In that ruling was the vality to the 911 tape in question.
I’m I supposed to believe “AS A BRIGHT FELLOW HEDRIK” that everyone on this “death penalty information forum” can not find out anything about this case? That I need to provide links like spoon-feeding an infant, that for the last 19 years no one on this death penalty information site has ever heard the fact the tape was never validated? Just myself when I looked into the case couple months back in June!!!
I was under the misconception that the people on this forum “pro death information” wanted only the guilty executed, not everyone the State produces through a Jury verdict.
If someone wishes to prove one statement of fact incorrect, all the power to them, reporters, and media do not post trial transcripts from there news articals they print, is everything they state about the investigation under scrutiny also? The facts of this case are public knowledge on public record, and the people on this forum know this. This is just a red herring to divert attention from the post I posted on here.

part two

Charles Hood has made media statements also concerning the investigation, and facts pertaining to the case, he is in a position that ever word he states is investigated to the fullest extent as for its validity. If he states that the 911 tape was not tested in the media as he has done, and this is a not true fact as we know it. It would be proved he is not credible, and everything else he states is most likely not true as well through investigators, media, the great people on the forum, EST. I could post an appeal through fifth district court if you like stating the appeal was rejected on the grounds that Charles Hood voice was identified on the tape. That was not stated proven through science analyses, but the word of a witness. The reason people are not posting contradictions to anything I post Hedrik, and removing, and editing my posts as Jeff does is because that is all they have! nothing but calling me names. If they could have ripped apart my first post with "Fowlly" believe me Hendik the gentleman complement would go flying out the window, as most likely this post will before you finish reading it by Jeff.
The pros as they calls themselves are like information paronias, they do not want me to validate the statement about the tape, they want me to provide information to validate a murder committed by Charles Hood. That is what they are asking for. That is all anyone is interested on here in my opinion, and I respect that fact as your opinion, not the same respect Hood received from here concerning a harmless statement from his death row cell to the great people on the forum, like Grandma ***** who most certainly will not be calling me a gentleman after reading this post, and flattering me with positive karma.
I do not believe I have anything left to say to the people here, except I will be looking forward to the new trial, but in all likely HOOD he is walking out the front gate a free man.
I had one last thought. If Charles Hood could be proven beyond a reasonable doubt innocent (not guilty) in a court of law with a jury of his peers could he become a member on here as I, or does he have a lifetime band on the fact he is on the hate list?
Thank you for letter me respond on this pro information forum.

Best regards.

It is my opinion that Charles Hood could be proved innocent in a new trial giving the evidence and the facts that were not introduced in the original trial. As for the question about how I know he is innocent, the same as the Jury who knew he was guilty. I know he is innocent giving the fact pertaining to the case that was not introduced or tested. I mentioned before if someone wishes to explain to me, why all this evidence was not introduced or tested, that could produced the truth, then perhaps my opinion will change, but I have not been presented with nothing, but the basic generic investigation proving Hood lived in the Home. Then all the propaganda Hollywood show, that was suggested, not proved through science, or anything, for an example: handwriting annalist of the checks,(never tested), handwriting annalist of the note left by the female victim (never tested) rape test on female victim (never tested) DNA in the car related to the murder, none (never entered), stolen car (suggested), stolen credit cards (suggested), stolen watch (suggested) Paraffin test clears Hood from firing a weapon (never entered) murder weapon (never found) motive (none) confession (none) This is just a little. I better stop. I could keep going. Fingerprints (never tested as splatter prints) EST, EST, EST. Alibi witness,(never asked to testify).

Basically in my opinion it come downs to Science, and DNA. The Science will prove through voice annalist on the tape played to the jury (That was never tested) that someone other than Hood was in the home 4 minutes before the male victim was murdered. The state suggested it was Hood reinforced with witness testimony. That was the identification the court stated (witness testimony, not credible, never redirected by defense through witness testimony) as fact LOL. The state felt that a witness is more credible than science, and the original defense never called one witness to contradict the testimony, so somehow that is defined as identified in a trial, and legal system looking for TRUTH. Impossible is the answer.

That is why I believe Hood never was proved guilty, but found guilty, by a jury who decided to listen to the suggestions of the truth, and ignore the fact nothing is conclusively valid, and should hold no merit according to a jury oath.(My opinion)

Vince.

Posted on Campaign to End All State Executions
The CEASE board.

Posted on Life on The Row. The Death Penalty Debate.

It is my opinion that Charles Hood could be proved innocent in a new trial giving the evidence and the facts that were not introduced in the original trial. As for the question about how I know he is innocent, the same as the Jury who knew he was guilty. I know he is innocent giving the fact pertaining to the case that was not introduced or tested. I mentioned before if someone wishes to explain to me, why all this evidence was not introduced or tested, that could produced the truth, then perhaps my opinion will change, but I have not been presented with nothing, but the basic generic investigation proving Hood lived in the Home. Then all the propaganda Hollywood show, that was suggested, not proved through science, or anything, for an example: handwriting annalist of the checks,(never tested), handwriting annalist of the note left by the female victim (never tested) rape test on female victim (never tested) DNA in the car related to the murder, none (never entered), stolen car (suggested), stolen credit cards (suggested), stolen watch (suggested) Paraffin test clears Hood from firing a weapon (never entered) murder weapon (never found) motive (none) confession (none) This is just a little. I better stop. I could keep going. Fingerprints (never tested as splatter prints) EST, EST, EST. Alibi witness,(never asked to testify).

Basically in my opinion it come downs to Science, and DNA. The Science will prove through voice annalist on the tape played to the jury (That was never tested) that someone other than Hood was in the home 4 minutes before the male victim was murdered. The state suggested it was Hood reinforced with witness testimony. That was the identification the court stated (witness testimony, not credible, never redirected by defense through witness testimony) as fact LOL. The state felt that a witness is more credible than science, and the original defense never called one witness to contradict the testimony, so somehow that is defined as identified in a trial, and legal system looking for TRUTH. Impossible is the answer.

That is why I believe Hood never was proved guilty, but found guilty, by a jury who decided to listen to the suggestions of the truth, and ignore the fact nothing is conclusively valid, and should hold no merit according to a jury oath.(My opinion)

Vince.

posted on " life on the row "

Essentially it comes down to the fact that Texas was going to execute a man based on the word of witnesses (voice identification), and a Jury’s interpretation of manufactured propaganda. The key elements (the thefts, and frauds where never proved but suggested.)

The irony the same system that was going to execute Hood will let him walk a free man rather than face the embracement of trying to fool the citizens of United States with another Hollywood show based on the fact that Hood now has VALID representation.

This case proves that people are being executed with little or, no evidence, and even less evidence in the Davis murder conviction. Where again it comes down to the word of one witness testifying.

The Federal Court once the appeals has reach that level will make a ruling, set Hood free or give him a new trial within 120 days. That is the way it will work. I am guessing it would be better to let Hood walk a free man as in the Tankleff appeal. It does not make any sense to waist taxpayer’s good money on a trial that shouldn’t even warrant a charge, never mind any real expectation of a conviction.

why don't you "vincent" support a starving child in africa or help a correctional officer raising her children alone or perhaps visit the elderly at a nursing home {they are lonely like inmates}
the only difference is they deserve a visit or a monetary donation. Please stop helping condemned murderers!!!!!!!!!!
Create a fund for fallen officers and let these bastards rot in there,,,,and for gods sake
"GET A LIFE"

I would love to help a correctional officer raising her children alone, just leave contact information, one of my good friends has been a correctional officer for over fifteen years. I know it took a toll on his family, and now he is left raising 3 children alone. I have all the respect in the world for what you people go through.

I am only concerned for a fair Justice system for the citizens, and a fair trial for the accused. That never happened in the Charles Hood murder trial, and his family can not afford to visit Texas to witness the execution during this festive season.

Vincent or whatever name he is going by now, is mentally ill. He's been run off a number of boards, including Topix, for his obscene blatherings. He lies, pretends to be other people, and harasses the family of victims. He's an all around POS.

***My attorney at trial wouldn’t allow me to testify on my behalf.***

No attorney can stop a defendant from testifying. Hoods attys advised him not to testify because one, they knew he was a lying sociopath and would hang himself. Two, it would open the door to additional negative evidence coming in. And last but most importantly: HIS ATTYS BELIEVED HOOD WAS GOING TO LIE ON THE STAND UNDER OATH AND THEY WOULD HAVE AN ETHICAL OBLIGATION TO REPORT THE PERJURED TESTIMONY TO THE COURT.

***Or the jury would have heard my voice to know it was not ( ME ) on the 911 tape. They could have determined right then it wasn’t me.***

One, the jury heard your voice on the tape. Two, the jury heard your voice because you shot off your big fat lying mouth through out the trial. Three, the prosecution put on a witness familiar with your voice who testified under oath that it was you speaking on the 911 tape. Four, Williamson referred to Dean while the other person was standing there and could be heard. You’re Dean. That's also authication.

***After being convicted. I filed a complaint to the Bar Association against my attorney expressing he wouldn’t have the voice analyses test done.***

One, your atty is familiar with your voice and heard the tape and knew it was you. Two, he couldn’t even put a witness on saying it wasn’t your voice because then he would be subjorning perjury. THREE, VOICE ANALYSES TEST ARE NOT ADMISSIBLE. YOU KNOW THAT. YOU’VE BEEN TOLD THAT A MILLION TIMES. BUT YOU KEEP LYING ABOUT IT HOPING TO SUCKER IN THE UNINFORMED.

***Goes to show you what type of attorney I had at trial. He didn’t care about saving my life, nor did he care about presenting evidence to prove I was innocent.***

A much better attorney than you deserved and one who was ethical enough not to lie to the jury to save you slimey lying murdering ass.

I don't have time to counter all the lies Hood tells. Just be assured, everything he says from "a" to "the" is a lie.

vincent wrote:

That I need to provide links like spoon-feeding an infant, that for the last 19 years no one on this death penalty information site has ever heard the fact the tape was never validated?

The tape was authenticated as required by law and was admitted into evidence. Stop lying.

The tape was authenticated by a witness testifying, not science, but an opinion (guess) based on an evaluation of a voice on a tape. The death threat tapes that have been proven NOT to be Mr. Hoods voice, could be compared to the 911 tape that was admitted into evidence at the original trial as the idenatal voice on both tapes, that is who committed these murders for anyone who cares about real justice, and as we stated not Mr. Hoods voice is on any tapes admitted or not admitted into evidence. This fact will be presented into evidence, and authenticated as required by law removing Mr. Hood from the timeline in question when the murders accorded. The fact Mr. Hood was somewhere else when the call occurred. The alibi witness placing Mr. Hood at the check cashing location will further validate that Mr. Hood could not have possibly have been in two places at the same time, and giving the fact of the tapes impossible to have been in the home in the time in question, and also to reradiate drive from the murder location, to the cash checking location in the time in question that has been validated an impossible drive giving the timelines. That fact alone again removes Mr. Hood as the person who committed the murders based on that one fact alone as who voice is on the tape?!!!! It can be proved he was cashing a check at the same time the 911 call occurred.

As for the checks they are not forged, and never proved to be forged, as the state would have you believe through suggestion as for a motive, nothing was analysed that was presented into evidence relating to notes being hand written or checks being hand written again in the trial for Mr. Hood life it was suggested as valid. This case proves that people are being executed with little or, no evidence, again it comes down to the word of one witness testifying, and peoples suggestions or opinions on which voices are on tapes when the science is available.

Mr. Hood has agreed, and submitted to two private-polygraph exam sessions, theses tests where conducted through an experienced expert examiner, this convincing evidence cleared Mr. Hood, Both the exams cleared Mr. Hood with flying colours as telling the truth. The polygraph exams are not admissible in a court of law, but I repeat passed these tests for the people of Texas.

Mr. Hood will be testifying in the new trial.

Sorry, jackass. You and Hood lose. His voice was identified as the second person heard on the tape and it was self authenticating. You can't lie your way out of it. There will be no new trial. Let's start the new year right! Hood should be a man and hang himself.