Local News: Livingston, TN 

 | 

Sign Up

 | 

Sign In

Advertisment

Obama's Frightening Insensitivity Following Shooting

Posted in the Livingston Forum

Comments

Showing posts 1 - 20 of109
< prev page
|
Go to last post| Jump to page:
illegal kenyan

Livingston, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1
Nov 6, 2009
 

Judged:

4

3

3

President Obama didn't wait long after Tuesday's devastating elections to give critics another reason to question his leadership, but this time the subject matter was more grim than a pair of governorships.

After news broke out of the shooting at the Fort Hood Army post in Texas, the nation watched in horror as the toll of dead and injured climbed. The White House was notified immediately and by late afternoon, word went out that the president would speak about the incident prior to a previously scheduled appearance. At about 5 p.m., cable stations went to the president. The situation called for not only his trademark eloquence, but also grace and perspective.

But instead of a somber chief executive offering reassuring words and expressions of sympathy and compassion, viewers saw a wildly disconnected and inappropriately light president making introductory remarks. At the event, a Tribal Nations Conference hosted by the Department of Interior's Bureau of Indian affairs, the president thanked various staffers and offered a "shout-out" to "Dr. Joe Medicine Crow -- that Congressional Medal of Honor winner." Three minutes in, the president spoke about the shooting, in measured and appropriate terms. Who is advising him?

Anyone at home aware of the major news story of the previous hours had to have been stunned. An incident like this requires a scrapping of the early light banter. The president should apologize for the tone of his remarks, explain what has happened, express sympathy for those slain and appeal for calm and patience until all the facts are in. That's the least that should occur.

Indeed, an argument could be made that Obama should have canceled the Indian event, out of respect for people having been murdered at an Army post a few hours before. That would have prevented any sort of jarring emotional switch at the event.

Did the president's team not realize what sort of image they were presenting to the country at this moment? The disconnect between what Americans at home knew had been going on -- and the initial words coming out of their president's mouth was jolting, if not disturbing.

It must have been disappointing for many politically aware Democrats, still reeling from the election two days before. The New Jersey gubernatorial vote had already demonstrated that the president and his political team couldn't produce a winning outcome in a state very friendly to Democrats (and where the president won by 15 points one year ago). And now this? Congressional Democrats must wonder if a White House that has burdened them with a too-heavy policy agenda over the last year has a strong enough political operation to help push that agenda through.

If the president's communications apparatus can't inform -- and protect -- their boss during tense moments when the country needs to see a focused commander-in-chief and a compassionate head of state, it has disastrous consequences for that president's party and supporters.

All the president's men (and women) fell down on the job Thursday. And Democrats across the country have real reason to panic.

http://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/politics/A-Di...
Get Real

Rickman, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2
Nov 6, 2009
 

Judged:

3

2

2

Like I said get real. If he had not done the speech at the Tribal Nations Conference then you would be whining and complaining about that.
Local

Livingston, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#3
Nov 6, 2009
 

Judged:

3

1

1

illegal kenyan wrote:
President Obama didn't wait long after Tuesday's devastating elections to give critics another reason to question his leadership, but this time the subject matter was more grim than a pair of governorships.
After news broke out of the shooting at the Fort Hood Army post in Texas, the nation watched in horror as the toll of dead and injured climbed. The White House was notified immediately and by late afternoon, word went out that the president would speak about the incident prior to a previously scheduled appearance. At about 5 p.m., cable stations went to the president. The situation called for not only his trademark eloquence, but also grace and perspective.
But instead of a somber chief executive offering reassuring words and expressions of sympathy and compassion, viewers saw a wildly disconnected and inappropriately light president making introductory remarks. At the event, a Tribal Nations Conference hosted by the Department of Interior's Bureau of Indian affairs, the president thanked various staffers and offered a "shout-out" to "Dr. Joe Medicine Crow -- that Congressional Medal of Honor winner." Three minutes in, the president spoke about the shooting, in measured and appropriate terms. Who is advising him?
Anyone at home aware of the major news story of the previous hours had to have been stunned. An incident like this requires a scrapping of the early light banter. The president should apologize for the tone of his remarks, explain what has happened, express sympathy for those slain and appeal for calm and patience until all the facts are in. That's the least that should occur.
Indeed, an argument could be made that Obama should have canceled the Indian event, out of respect for people having been murdered at an Army post a few hours before. That would have prevented any sort of jarring emotional switch at the event.
Did the president's team not realize what sort of image they were presenting to the country at this moment? The disconnect between what Americans at home knew had been going on -- and the initial words coming out of their president's mouth was jolting, if not disturbing.
It must have been disappointing for many politically aware Democrats, still reeling from the election two days before. The New Jersey gubernatorial vote had already demonstrated that the president and his political team couldn't produce a winning outcome in a state very friendly to Democrats (and where the president won by 15 points one year ago). And now this? Congressional Democrats must wonder if a White House that has burdened them with a too-heavy policy agenda over the last year has a strong enough political operation to help push that agenda through.
If the president's communications apparatus can't inform -- and protect -- their boss during tense moments when the country needs to see a focused commander-in-chief and a compassionate head of state, it has disastrous consequences for that president's party and supporters.
All the president's men (and women) fell down on the job Thursday. And Democrats across the country have real reason to panic.
http://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/politics/A-Di...
If duba was pres now he would not have known of the shootings until today.

Since: Aug 09

Cookeville, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#4
Nov 6, 2009
 

Judged:

2

1

1

illegal kenyan wrote:
President Obama didn't wait long after Tuesday's devastating elections to give critics another reason to question his leadership, but this time the subject matter was more grim than a pair of governorships.
After news broke out of the shooting at the Fort Hood Army post in Texas, the nation watched in horror as the toll of dead and injured climbed. The White House was notified immediately and by late afternoon, word went out that the president would speak about the incident prior to a previously scheduled appearance. At about 5 p.m., cable stations went to the president. The situation called for not only his trademark eloquence, but also grace and perspective.
But instead of a somber chief executive offering reassuring words and expressions of sympathy and compassion, viewers saw a wildly disconnected and inappropriately light president making introductory remarks. At the event, a Tribal Nations Conference hosted by the Department of Interior's Bureau of Indian affairs, the president thanked various staffers and offered a "shout-out" to "Dr. Joe Medicine Crow -- that Congressional Medal of Honor winner." Three minutes in, the president spoke about the shooting, in measured and appropriate terms. Who is advising him?
Anyone at home aware of the major news story of the previous hours had to have been stunned. An incident like this requires a scrapping of the early light banter. The president should apologize for the tone of his remarks, explain what has happened, express sympathy for those slain and appeal for calm and patience until all the facts are in. That's the least that should occur.
Indeed, an argument could be made that Obama should have canceled the Indian event, out of respect for people having been murdered at an Army post a few hours before. That would have prevented any sort of jarring emotional switch at the event.
Did the president's team not realize what sort of image they were presenting to the country at this moment? The disconnect between what Americans at home knew had been going on -- and the initial words coming out of their president's mouth was jolting, if not disturbing.
It must have been disappointing for many politically aware Democrats, still reeling from the election two days before. The New Jersey gubernatorial vote had already demonstrated that the president and his political team couldn't produce a winning outcome in a state very friendly to Democrats (and where the president won by 15 points one year ago). And now this? Congressional Democrats must wonder if a White House that has burdened them with a too-heavy policy agenda over the last year has a strong enough political operation to help push that agenda through.
If the president's communications apparatus can't inform -- and protect -- their boss during tense moments when the country needs to see a focused commander-in-chief and a compassionate head of state, it has disastrous consequences for that president's party and supporters.
All the president's men (and women) fell down on the job Thursday. And Democrats across the country have real reason to panic.
http://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/politics/A-Di...
Seems clear where the focus of whoever wrote this was. Also seems clear where it should be.
ino u2

Hilham, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5
Nov 6, 2009
 

Judged:

2

1

1

its another muslim terrorist attack
Billy

Cookeville, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#6
Nov 6, 2009
 

Judged:

3

3

2

Local, wake up Duba ain't prez no more you can't blame this one on him. Bammy will have to take this one. This sort of stuff never happened under Duba's watch. If Bammy would give more support to our troops things like this could be advertived. I guess we know who you supported, therefore I hope you shoulder some of the blame and bow you head in disgrace.

Since: Jun 09

Livingston, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7
Nov 6, 2009
 

Judged:

3

2

2

illegal kenyan wrote:
President Obama didn't wait long after Tuesday's devastating elections to give critics another reason to question his leadership, but this time the subject matter was more grim than a pair of governorships.
After news broke out of the shooting at the Fort Hood Army post in Texas, the nation watched in horror as the toll of dead and injured climbed. The White House was notified immediately and by late afternoon, word went out that the president would speak about the incident prior to a previously scheduled appearance. At about 5 p.m., cable stations went to the president. The situation called for not only his trademark eloquence, but also grace and perspective.
But instead of a somber chief executive offering reassuring words and expressions of sympathy and compassion, viewers saw a wildly disconnected and inappropriately light president making introductory remarks. At the event, a Tribal Nations Conference hosted by the Department of Interior's Bureau of Indian affairs, the president thanked various staffers and offered a "shout-out" to "Dr. Joe Medicine Crow -- that Congressional Medal of Honor winner." Three minutes in, the president spoke about the shooting, in measured and appropriate terms. Who is advising him?
Anyone at home aware of the major news story of the previous hours had to have been stunned. An incident like this requires a scrapping of the early light banter. The president should apologize for the tone of his remarks, explain what has happened, express sympathy for those slain and appeal for calm and patience until all the facts are in. That's the least that should occur.
Indeed, an argument could be made that Obama should have canceled the Indian event, out of respect for people having been murdered at an Army post a few hours before. That would have prevented any sort of jarring emotional switch at the event.
Did the president's team not realize what sort of image they were presenting to the country at this moment? The disconnect between what Americans at home knew had been going on -- and the initial words coming out of their president's mouth was jolting, if not disturbing.
It must have been disappointing for many politically aware Democrats, still reeling from the election two days before. The New Jersey gubernatorial vote had already demonstrated that the president and his political team couldn't produce a winning outcome in a state very friendly to Democrats (and where the president won by 15 points one year ago). And now this? Congressional Democrats must wonder if a White House that has burdened them with a too-heavy policy agenda over the last year has a strong enough political operation to help push that agenda through.
If the president's communications apparatus can't inform -- and protect -- their boss during tense moments when the country needs to see a focused commander-in-chief and a compassionate head of state, it has disastrous consequences for that president's party and supporters.
All the president's men (and women) fell down on the job Thursday. And Democrats across the country have real reason to panic.
http://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/politics/A-Di...
His response tells us a lot about where his priorities and concerns lie. It'll be interesting to see how his apologists here handle this.

“Seconds Count”

Since: Jan 09

Celina/Livingston

ISP: Gainesboro, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#8
Nov 6, 2009
 

Judged:

5

3

2

Did I expect more?...no
michelle

Hilham, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#9
Nov 7, 2009
 
illegal kenyan wrote:
President Obama didn't wait long after Tuesday's devastating elections to give critics another reason to question his leadership, but this time the subject matter was more grim than a pair of governorships.
After news broke out of the shooting at the Fort Hood Army post in Texas, the nation watched in horror as the toll of dead and injured climbed. The White House was notified immediately and by late afternoon, word went out that the president would speak about the incident prior to a previously scheduled appearance. At about 5 p.m., cable stations went to the president. The situation called for not only his trademark eloquence, but also grace and perspective.
But instead of a somber chief executive offering reassuring words and expressions of sympathy and compassion, viewers saw a wildly disconnected and inappropriately light president making introductory remarks. At the event, a Tribal Nations Conference hosted by the Department of Interior's Bureau of Indian affairs, the president thanked various staffers and offered a "shout-out" to "Dr. Joe Medicine Crow -- that Congressional Medal of Honor winner." Three minutes in, the president spoke about the shooting, in measured and appropriate terms. Who is advising him?
Anyone at home aware of the major news story of the previous hours had to have been stunned. An incident like this requires a scrapping of the early light banter. The president should apologize for the tone of his remarks, explain what has happened, express sympathy for those slain and appeal for calm and patience until all the facts are in. That's the least that should occur.
Indeed, an argument could be made that Obama should have canceled the Indian event, out of respect for people having been murdered at an Army post a few hours before. That would have prevented any sort of jarring emotional switch at the event.
Did the president's team not realize what sort of image they were presenting to the country at this moment? The disconnect between what Americans at home knew had been going on -- and the initial words coming out of their president's mouth was jolting, if not disturbing.
It must have been disappointing for many politically aware Democrats, still reeling from the election two days before. The New Jersey gubernatorial vote had already demonstrated that the president and his political team couldn't produce a winning outcome in a state very friendly to Democrats (and where the president won by 15 points one year ago). And now this? Congressional Democrats must wonder if a White House that has burdened them with a too-heavy policy agenda over the last year has a strong enough political operation to help push that agenda through.
If the president's communications apparatus can't inform -- and protect -- their boss during tense moments when the country needs to see a focused commander-in-chief and a compassionate head of state, it has disastrous consequences for that president's party and supporters.
All the president's men (and women) fell down on the job Thursday. And Democrats across the country have real reason to panic.
http://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/politics/A-Di...
love your COPY and PASTE , to many big words in there for you.
waterdog

Monterey, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10
Nov 7, 2009
 

Judged:

5

2

2

I thought from the begining that he was not an American. Still hasen't produced a legal birth certificate. Every day seems to point more toward him being an under cover enemy, so to speak. I guess because he is a Dem. makes it O.K. Well not by me! I have thought he is our enemy from day one. He intends to ruin this country and will if something is not done to stop him. I know what needs to be done with him, but that is against the law.
watchdog

Hilham, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#11
Nov 7, 2009
 

Judged:

4

2

2

Im reporting your post to the FBI right now.
you can explain it to them what you mean and perhaps other slanderous posts you have made in the past.
How

Monterey, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#12
Nov 7, 2009
 

Judged:

2

1

1

This is indeed a sad and tragic event.

We hear of this type of behavior regular, where someone goes on a shooting rampage, usually at a school.

How is it the president's fault?
scum

Cookeville, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#14
Nov 7, 2009
 

Judged:

1

1

1

What should he have done?

Since: Nov 08

Rickman Tn.

ISP: Livingston, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#15
Nov 7, 2009
 

Judged:

3

3

3

I thought it was an odd situation. As events were happening the news guy said "and now the President"....Then I hear Obama doing shout outs to people in the audience and then he talks about how he going to "take care" of the Indians, and then 3 minutes into it he finally starts talking about the Jihadist bastard shooting our soldiers in cold blood.

He said "We shouldn't jump to conclusions" BUT he had no problem jumping to conclusions with the Professor and the cop........

It's well know that I'm not a fan of President Obama BUT surely even the most admiring person must admit it was an odd situation?
trisha

Livingston, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#16
Nov 7, 2009
 

Judged:

6

1

1

I have a son who is in the military thank GOD when he came out of ait he/we feared he might get stationed @ FT.HOOD. I was so very dissapointed when I watched the potus shout out to the old crow when 40,000 parents ,wifes ,children, families had no idea if their family members were hurt. I think it could and should have been handled better.

“Seconds Count”

Since: Jan 09

Celina/Livingston

ISP: Baxter, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#17
Nov 7, 2009
 

Judged:

4

1

1

Human lifes, good Americans lost. No..Obama couldn't have stopped it but, on a list of the to do list..it should have took first priority. Even the slowest of slow should have expected that.

Watchdog, give me a break. It was a comment...someone should call the FBI on you.
obama fan

Old Hickory, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#18
Nov 7, 2009
 

Judged:

3

3

3

you guys are something! please get real! no matter what he does there you-all are with your nasty comments! i have never seen such in my whole life! are you guys for real! obama is a good person and president and you-all cant stand it! get real!

“Seconds Count”

Since: Jan 09

Celina/Livingston

ISP: Baxter, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#19
Nov 7, 2009
 

Judged:

3

2

1

obama fan wrote:
you guys are something! please get real! no matter what he does there you-all are with your nasty comments! i have never seen such in my whole life! are you guys for real! obama is a good person and president and you-all cant stand it! get real!
Ok, you like him and that is fine, some of us do not and that is also fine. How about you let each of us feel as we want...we will anyway.
obama fan

Old Hickory, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#20
Nov 7, 2009
 

Judged:

2

2

1

come on you-all surely can think of one nice thing too say about obama! i can think of one thing nice too say about bush!
SilenceIsGolden

Scottsville, KY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#21
Nov 7, 2009
 

Judged:

3

2

2

I have to admit....I do have one nice thing to say about President Obama. Actually 2 or 3 nice things. Im sure all would have to agree with me. He has a very nice smile. He has a very good way of speaking. He dresses very nice.....If I got paid as much as he does I could dress nice, say poo poo and make it sound like sugar was coating it and smile while doing it. There some very nice things have been said about our President. Oh I almost forgot to mention....He has very white teeth!
Would you like us to alert you when someone adds a comment?
(registration is not required)
Showing posts 1 - 20 of109
< prev page
|
Go to last post| Jump to page:
Type in your comments to post to the forum
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Other Recent Livingston Discussions

Search the Livingston Forum:
Topic Updated Last By Comments
fastest dodge diesel (Apr '09) 52 min hahaha 53
Man To Remain Jailed In Woman's Death (Nov '08) 3 hr very concerned 1344
who drives a gold dodge diesel 4 hr bobby 3
county sheriff's race 4 hr OH NO 74
Nice Posts Thread (Sep '08) 4 hr blue eyed dog 1572
pitbull (Sep '08) 4 hr here we go a... 122
anyone know Harold Ray 5 hr jessica 7

Put a lid on it

Get your topix hats, t-shirts & more!

Shop our store now!

Powered by Krillion

Cars [ See all ]

Livingston Jobs

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
Livingston Dating

more search filters

less search filters

Livingston People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Livingston News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Livingston

Daily Horoscope for December 25

Virgo

So much love and effort. You want the day to be a big success, and it's going to be that way. You'll be very popular if you can bring some spontaneity to the day, such as springing an exciting surprise on everyone or swapping a tired old tradition for something much more interesting. You might also have an unexpected visitor at some point.

Get your Horoscope »