LaDonra Be Talkin to the VP

Just Sayin wrote:

I love the way you contradict yourself.
"Thankfully yours is not the only vote in Doraville. There are more good people in Doraville than there are people like you. You must be worried.The good people here are smart enough to see thru the likes of you and whoever you're speaking for."
Are you too damn dumb to figure out these are the same people who DID NOT vote you into office? The number of "smart" people is growing or recognizing what a foul person you and your ilk (Ginny, Holly, etc.) are. WE will continue to work to keep you off council and out of our lives. Just live your little squalid existence in Oakcliff and leave running of the city to those with the education and class to do so (excluding most of the current council!)

Some people cannot take the hint. GO AWAY! Do not run again, PLEASE! Anger and bitterness are not qualifications for city council.

Jane wrote:

<quoted text>
Some people cannot take the hint. GO AWAY! Do not run again, PLEASE! Anger and bitterness are not qualifications for city council.

"Jane" ? or whoever you claim to be now, I am not/will not be going away...Whether I run again or not remains to be seen.
I am not angry or bitter toward anything or anyone. What seems to be your problem? Its obvious by your posts that you are upset with pretty much anything that is not agreeable to your way of thinking. If you want to talk about it, you know who I am and you can find out how to get in touch with me in person. Your call. I can listen to what you have to say, however that does not in any stretch of the imagination mean I will agree with you.

Just Sayin wrote:

I love the way you contradict yourself.
"Thankfully yours is not the only vote in Doraville. There are more good people in Doraville than there are people like you. You must be worried.The good people here are smart enough to see thru the likes of you and whoever you're speaking for."
Are you too damn dumb to figure out these are the same people who DID NOT vote you into office? The number of "smart" people is growing or recognizing what a foul person you and your ilk (Ginny, Holly, etc.) are. WE will continue to work to keep you off council and out of our lives. Just live your little squalid existence in Oakcliff and leave running of the city to those with the education and class to do so (excluding most of the current council!)

Dumb? What are you talking about? I lost by 53 votes..there were more than 53 who did not vote in the run off. Your 'smart' people have nothing to do with this post from you. Speak for yourself and let 'your' people do the same. They are all capable of speaking for what they want to say aren't they? or have you prohibited them from even thinking or speaking for themselves? Ginny and Holly have no part of my conversation or posts so when you are referring to me, leave them out of it. As for education and class to be on city council or anything else, you do not know what you are talking about as with most of your posts on here. Its becoming more obvious who you really are, so keep spreading rumors, lies and inuendos so everyone call tell who you are.

Other than Robert and Trudy clear the deck. No hasbeens or spouses are coming back.

You know, Sharon, I am done with you. Making an effort to get you to see the light is like talking to the wall.

You are not worth expending any more time on. Whether you go away or not, your credibility went out the window that night at the debate so just go crawl back under that rock.

Just Sayin wrote:

You know, Sharon, I am done with you. Making an effort to get you to see the light is like talking to the wall.
You are not worth expending any more time on. Whether you go away or not, your credibility went out the window that night at the debate so just go crawl back under that rock.

That was a priceless moment! I will give all of our current council credit for one thing, not one of them has yet to storm out of a meeting because of Ginny's head shaking and eye rolling. In my book that shows real restraint and self control.

sharon spangler wrote:

<quoted text>
"Jane" ? or whoever you claim to be now, I am not/will not be going away...Whether I run again or not remains to be seen.
I am not angry or bitter toward anything or anyone. What seems to be your problem? Its obvious by your posts that you are upset with pretty much anything that is not agreeable to your way of thinking. If you want to talk about it, you know who I am and you can find out how to get in touch with me in person. Your call. I can listen to what you have to say, however that does not in any stretch of the imagination mean I will agree with you.

I would vote for Pachuta over you, and that's sayin something!

That old prostitute has a lot in common with MoDonya and so does Pamie Sue. Girls of a common feather flock together.

Such a mean hateful spirited bunch of people most of you are. How do you sleep at night? You wouldn't know anything without being spoon fed by your cronies - and Doraville will never be anything more than a spot on the map. God have mercy on you.

Just Sayin wrote:

You know, Sharon, I am done with you. Making an effort to get you to see the light is like talking to the wall.
You are not worth expending any more time on. Whether you go away or not, your credibility went out the window that night at the debate so just go crawl back under that rock.

I am having no problem with 'seeing the light'....you have a real problem with anyone who does not agree with your way of thinking. As for the debate and me walking out of it, it was the right thing to do..the citizen sitting there making the faces rolling her eyes and making noises was to distract from anything I had to say. I was told it was a set up and now when I think of it, it was. You can interpret it however you like. What you think does not matter to me at all. Just make sure you tell the facts and the whole truth and not just how you would like it to be. Everyone is starting to see thru that crap. Sorry to disappoint you AGAIN, but I WILL NOT be crawling back anywhere...Get use to me being around.

Jim wrote:

<quoted text>
I would vote for Pachuta over you, and that's sayin something!

Go for it..if you live in the city of Doraville you can vote for her.. You can even write her in if she doesn't run for office. Obviously you don't know much about me or her.

Marky Mark wrote:

<quoted text>
That was a priceless moment! I will give all of our current council credit for one thing, not one of them has yet to storm out of a meeting because of Ginny's head shaking and eye rolling. In my book that shows real restraint and self control.

No, they don't have as much control as you think..some on council (most) have walked out for other reasons...and Ginny was not the one who was rolling her eyes and shaking her head when I walked out..so you still don't know what you are talking about. Thats the problem with listening to something thats been repeated so many times and twisted to make it what you want to hear.

Shane wrote:

Other than Robert and Trudy clear the deck. No hasbeens or spouses are coming back.

I don't believe that will be your call. Others have a say in who or who doesn't come back. Same for spouses. I also like Trudy and Robert !

What about your fair haired Council Woman who cusses at people and/or other Council members before she walks out of the meeting and sheds her phony tears?

Observer wrote:

What about your fair haired Council Woman who cusses at people and/or other Council members before she walks out of the meeting and sheds her phony tears?

Pamie Sue? Is it the pot smoking from the urban garden?

sharon spangler wrote:

<quoted text>
I don't believe that will be your call. Others have a say in who or who doesn't come back. Same for spouses. I also like Trudy and Robert !

But they can't stand you. You hsve white trash stamped all over you the same as your dufus husband.

Luke wrote:

<quoted text>
But they can't stand you. You hsve white trash stamped all over you the same as your dufus husband.

Who is 'they'? And who are you speaking for? Let 'they' speak for themselves. And lets talk face to face. You are beginning to sound pitiful ! name calling etc. Just shows the more you talk the more you don't know what you are talking about. You need to get over the fact that I run for office and my husband was in office and there is nothing you can do about any of it. And I am proud white trash !! I do sign my name to my posts unlike you..what do you have to be proud of?

sharon spangler wrote:

<quoted text>
I am having no problem with 'seeing the light'....you have a real problem with anyone who does not agree with your way of thinking. As for the debate and me walking out of it, it was the right thing to do..the citizen sitting there making the faces rolling her eyes and making noises was to distract from anything I had to say. I was told it was a set up and now when I think of it, it was. You can interpret it however you like. What you think does not matter to me at all. Just make sure you tell the facts and the whole truth and not just how you would like it to be. Everyone is starting to see thru that crap. Sorry to disappoint you AGAIN, but I WILL NOT be crawling back anywhere...Get use to me being around.

Council members have to put up with eye rolling and head shaking (of course some of them roll their eyes too) at every meeting. It would NOT be the right thing to do for them to walk out. As for being "set up", why did you take the bait? I believe the "facts and the whole truth" is that you have no self control.

sharon spangler wrote:

<quoted text>
No, they don't have as much control as you think..some on council (most) have walked out for other reasons...and Ginny was not the one who was rolling her eyes and shaking her head when I walked out..so you still don't know what you are talking about. Thats the problem with listening to something thats been repeated so many times and twisted to make it what you want to hear.

I know it wasn't Ginny, I was there. I'm just saying that Ginny shakes her head and rolls her eyes at meetings when she's attends them. She should get the hint and keep her blue head still and stop trying to distract the council with her crap.

Jim wrote:

<quoted text>
Council members have to put up with eye rolling and head shaking (of course some of them roll their eyes too) at every meeting. It would NOT be the right thing to do for them to walk out. As for being "set up", why did you take the bait? I believe the "facts and the whole truth" is that you have no self control.

Jim or whoever you are, You know nothing about me. Thats obvious. Council does not have to put up with anything from the audience. They can be removed from the meeting. The mayor can and will have them removed if there are any shenanigans going on in the audience.
As for me 'taking the bait', I sit there for quite a while watching the lady on the front row making the faces, sneering, and act like a total idiot and I had been assured that would not be tolerated by the 2 people responsible for the forum. This had happened before when Tom Hart was answering at a previous candidte forum. When I was asked to participate I said yes, if the audience was not going to be allowed to make noises or gestures. That did not happen.When there was no stop being put to it, I ask the lady if she had a problem with my answers and thats when she had an outburst. I then decided the best thing to do was to leave. Ben Crawford come out and offered to tell the lady she had to leave. I told him NO. I then went back in to the forum and continued with no further incidents..If you had been there you would know what happened. But listen to your buddies and keep telling yourselves that it actually happened however you want it to. You DON'T know the truth and you don't want to hear it either. Another truth you don't want to hear is that most all on council have walked out, or stomped out...and most were crying or in tears, so don't even go there. You do not know what you are talking about.
Just how credible is something being said by someone who won't sign their real name?